Understand the Construct of Formative Assessment and Its Role between Diagnostic and Summative: High School Entrepreneurship Subjects

Azira Prawinugraha, Universitas Muhammadiyah PROF. DR. HAMKA, Indonesia
Sri Yuliawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah PROF. DR. HAMKA, Indonesia
Sugiarto Sugiarto, Universitas Muhammadiyah PROF. DR. HAMKA, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to understand formative assessment construct for high school entrepreneurship subjects, as well as examining the relationship between diagnostic and summative. Mixed research methods transformative design approach. The first framework is mix methodology: convergent parallel design combine qualitative interactive model analysis (IMA) techniques and quantitative exploratory factor analysis (EFA) techniques. The second framework is quantitative confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. The research location was in a cluster of senior high schools in Bintan district. The IMA sample consists of 5 high school entrepreneurship teachers recruited through purposive sampling, while for the EFA and CFA, 259 students were recruited randomly. IMA analyze the understanding and factors involved by teachers in carrying out formative assessments as an important element of learning progress, EFA explore the initial composition of formative assessment constructs, and CFA act as a lens (affirmation) that evaluates the outer model EFA forms a fit model. The final interpretation explains that the construct of formative assessment in entrepreneurship subjects has the nature of complementarity, an inner model that moves circularly, repeated interactions produce learning progress, and strengthens the basis of the centrality of formative between diagnostic and summative.


Keywords


Formative Assessment, Entrepreneurship Subjects, Transformative Design, Psychometric Construct, High School

References


Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Baron, R. A., Franklin, R. J., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2016). Why Entrepreneurs Often Experience Low, Not High, Levels of Stress: The Joint Effects of Selection and Psychological Capital. Journal of Management, 42(3), 742–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495411

Bhat, B. A. (2020). Formative and Summative Evaluation Techniques for Improvement of Learning Process. European Journal of Business & Social Sciences, 7(5).

Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New Trends in Formative-Summative Evaluations for Adult Education. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In Praise of Educational Research: Formative Assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721

Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397

Boston, C. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(2002).

Brem, A., & Radziwon, A. (2017). Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects – A case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.002

Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Bouda, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

Buck, G. A., Trauth-nare, A., Kaftan, J., & Ave, N. R. (2010). Making Formative Assessment Discernable to Pre-Service Teachers of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20344

Bujor, A., & Avasilcai, S. (2016). The Creative Entrepreneur: A Framework of Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.086

Cagasan, L., Care, E., Robertson, P., & Luo, R. (2020). Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Examine Formative Assessment Practices in the Philippines. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766960

Carreira, M. (2012). Formative Assessment in HL Teaching: Purposes, Procedures, and Practices. Heritage Language Journal, 9(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.9.1.6 Heritage

Chienwattanasook, K., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Impact of entrepreneur education on entrepreneurial self-employment: A study from thailand. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.08

Choi, C. H., & You, Y.-Y. (2017). The Study On the Comparative Analysis of EFA and CFA. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 103–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.103

Chróinín, D. N., & Cosgrave, C. (2014). Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Implementing formative assessment in primary physical education : teacher perspectives and experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.666787

Clark, I. (2010). Formative assessment : ‘There is nothing so practical as a good theory.’ Australian Journal of Education, 54(3), 341–352.

Colombelli, A., Panelli, A., & Serraino, F. (2022). A Learning-by-Doing Approach to Entrepreneurship Education: Evidence from a Short Intensive Online International Program. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010016

Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., & Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring Relations Between Formative and Summative Assessment. Contributions from Science Education Research, 4, 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3

Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessments : The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessments in Education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.

Efendi, M. Y., Patriasih, R., & Setiawati, T. (2018). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Interest in Entrepreneurship in Students of SMK Negeri 9 Bandung. Media Pendidikan, Gizi, Dan Kuliner, 7(2), 51–56.

Fernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2015). Adolescents’homework performance in mathematics and science: Personal factors and teaching practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000032

Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: an integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445

Glazer, N. (2014). Formative Plus Summative Assessment in Large Undergraduate Courses : Why Both ? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2), 276–286.

Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2017). Formative Assessment to Support Students ’ Competences in Inquiry-Based Science Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Volume, 11(2), 6–19.

Guest, G., & Fleming, P. J. (2019). Mixed Methods Research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care (Issue February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch12

Jabeen, F., Faisal, M. N., & Katsioloudes, M. I. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset and the role of universities as strategic drivers of entrepreneurship: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2016-0117

Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC Journal, 45(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546962

Kemendikbud. (2013). Module Entrepreneurship Education.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Pedoman Program Kewirausahaan SMA. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas. http://repositori.kemendikbud.go.id/id/eprint/18602

Kemendikbud. (2020). Pengembangan Produk Kreatif dan Kewirausahaan SMK.

Marsaoli, R., & Kusumasari, B. (2022). Understanding Entrepreneurship Policy Program in Indonesia: An Analysis at Micro and Macro Level. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.8.2.169

Miles, Huberman, & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications Inc.

Pittaway, L., & Edwards, C. (2012). Assessment: Examining practice in entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 54(8), 778–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274882

Prawinugraha, A., Latief, M. J., & Sugiono. (2021). Entrepreneurship Education Based on Local Wisdom of Marine and Fishery Resources. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 3035–3048. https://doi.org//doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.1084

Rasmussen, R. M. (2016). Assessment For Learning in Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education. Emerald Insight, 2, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-229520160000002002

Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of Multivariate Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1268907

Rusdiana. (2017). Entrepreneur Theory And Practice. CV Pustaka Setia. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/6gujt

Sasongko, R. N. (2017). The Effectiveness of Entrepreneurship Education Process Standards in Schools (Evaluative Study in Several Public Senior High Schools in Bengkulu Province). Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Kewirausahaan: Memajukan Kewirausahaan Dalam Upaya Membangun Indonesia, 107–116.

Sledge, L. (2012). Get your education: Family support for African-American college students. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 4(1), 1–26. http://commons.emich.edu/mcnair/vol4/iss1/6

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

Sulistiono, S., Nurendah, Y., & Mulyana, M. (2019). Measuring Interest in Study of High School and Vocational High School Students in Bogor City in the Entrepreneurship Study Program. JAS-PT Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.36339/jaspt.v3i1.208

Tobias, S., & Carlson, J. E. (2010). Brief report: Bartlett’s test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4(3), 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0403_8

Welsh, D. H. B., & Tullar, W. L. (2014). A Model of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship and Assessment. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0038

Westbroek, H. B., van Rens, L., van den Berg, E., & Janssen, F. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i2.77143

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics