EVALUASI KINERJA GURU FISIKA, BIOLOGI DAN KIMIA SMA YANG SUDAH LULUS SERTIFIKASI
Soewarno S, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Zarlaida Fitri, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Abstract
Kata kunci: evaluasi, kinerja guru, validitas, reliabilitas
______________________________________________________________
AN EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTIFIED SCIENCE TEACHERS (PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY) OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Abstract
This study was aimed at (1) developing a valid and reliable performance evaluation instruments for teachers, and (2) evaluating the level of Physics, Biology and Chemistry teachers of senior high schools who have been certified and received theprofession allowance. The population of this study included all certified Physics, Biology and Chemistry teachers of senior high schools who have received profession allowance in Banda Aceh, Aceh Besar, and Pidie. The construct validity of the instrument developed was assessed through factor analysis, and the reliability was estimated by using Cronbach’s Alpha formula. The level of teachers’performance was analyzed by the percentage. The result of the research shows that (1) the instrument developed consists of 33 items, and has an internal consistency reliability coefficient of 0,953, (2) not all certified high school teachers who have received profession allowance and teach Physics, Biology and Chemistry show high performance, and (3) the performance of Chemistry teachers is relatively higher than that of Physics and Biology teachers.
Keywords: evaluation, teachers’ performance, validity, reliability
Full Text:
FULL TEXT PDFReferences
Anderson, Scarvia B, et al .(!975).Encyclopedia of educational evaluation. California: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publisher.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (2003).Penyusunan skala psikologis, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Caroll, Stephen J., Tosi, Henry L.(1977).Organizational behavior, Chicago St: Clair Press.
Djaali&Muljono,Pudji.(2008). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan.Jakarta: Grasindo.
Gable, Robert K. (1986). Instrumen development in affective domain. Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Gibson, L, Incevich,John M.& Donnelly.(1985). Organization. Texas: Busines Publicatiobs, Inc.
Gronlund, Norman E & Robert L. Linn.(1985).Measurement andevaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan PublishingCompany.
Hadi, Sutrisno.(1986).Metodologi research. Jilid 2, Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbit Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Miller, Richard J. (1975). Developing programs for faculty evaluation. San Fransisco: Jessey-Bass Publishers.
Mitchell, Terence R. (1982).People in organizations understanding their behavior. New York: McGraw Hill,Book Company.
MuhammadAs”ad. (1995).Psikologi industri .Yogyakarta: Liberti,.
Muhammad, Farouk dan Djaali. (2005). Metodologi penelitian sosial, Jakarta: Restu Agung
Prowirosentono, Suyadi. (1999). Kebijakan kinerja karyawan.Yogyakarta: BPFE,
Reddy, R. S. (1998).Principles and practices of teacher education. New Delhi: Rajat Publication.
Riyanto, Astin.(2003).Proses belajar mengajar efektif di perguruan tinggi.Bandung: Yapemdo
Santoso, Singgih.(2003).SPSS statistik multivariate. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputido.
Soekartawi. (1995).Meningkatkan efektivitas mengajar, Jakarta:Pustaka Jaya. Sumiyati.(2005). Hubunganantara kreativitas, kecerdasan emosional, danpenguasaan materi dengan kinerja guru kimia SMU di DKI, Sinopsis Disertasi. PPs Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2000).Pengembangan alat ukur psikologis.Yogyakarta: Andi Offet.
Usman, Mohd.Uzer. (2003).Menjadi guru profesional, Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1097
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:
ISSN 2338-6061 (online) || ISSN 2685-7111 (print)
View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics