FAKTOR-FAKTOR KESULITAN GURU PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK INTEGRATIF DI SD KOTA MATARAM

Muhamad Ahyar Rasidi, , Indonesia
Farida Agus Setiawati, Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/jpe.v3i2.6504

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan faktor-faktor kesulitan guru pada pembelajaran tematik integratif di SD Kota Mataram. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survey dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh  guru SD yang ada di Kota Mataram. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara multistage random sampling dan dianalisis dengan analisis faktor eksploratori. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada empat faktor kesulitan guru pada perencanaan pembelajaran yaitu: (1) penjabaran materi yang relevan dengan konten pembelajaran, (2) pemilihan metode dan media berorientasi lingkungan, (3) penyusunan indikator, dan (4) penjabaran materi yang relevan dengan tema. Pada aspek pelaksanaan, terdapat tiga faktor yaitu: (1) penguasaan konsep dalam pembelajaran saintifik yang interaktif, (2) pemanfaatan media dalam menciptakan karya, dan (3) penguasaan keterampilan apersepsi. Pada pengelolaan kelas, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi adalah: (1) penataan kelas yang variatif dan edukatif, (2) pengkordinasian belajar sesuai konteks pembelajaran, dan (3) pengkoordinasian kelas dengan regulasi simpel dan terukur. Ditemukan tiga faktor pada penilaian pembelajaran yaitu: (1) pengembangan perangkat penilaian terstandar, (2) pendeskripsian hasil belajar secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif, dan (3) pemilihan instrumen penilaian sikap, pengetahuan, dan keterampilan.

Kata Kunci: faktor-faktor, kesulitan guru, pembelajaran tematik integratif

 

THE FACTORS THE TEACHERS’ DIFFICULTIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INTEGRATED THEMATIC TEACHING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN MATARAM

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors the teachers’ difficulties in the implementation of an integrated thematic teaching in elementary schools in Mataram. This study is a survey with the quantitative approach. The population in this study was all primary school teachers in the city of Mataram. The sampling was done by multistage random sampling and were analyzed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA).The results show that there are four factors of the teacher’s difficulty in the lesson planning: (1) elaborating the material relevant to the learning content, (2) the selection of methods and environment-oriented media, (3) the development of indicators, and (4) the translation of relevant material by themes. In the aspect of implementation, there are three factors: (1) the acquisition of scientific concepts in an interactive learning, (2) the use ofthe media in creating works, and (3) the acquisition of skill apperception. In the classroom management, the factors  include: (1) structuring varied and educational classes, (2) coordinating learning appropriate to learning context, and (3) coordinating the class with simple and scalable regulation while the learning assessment deals with (1) developing a standardized assessment tool, (2) describing the results of the qualitative and quantitative study, and (3) choosing the attitude, knowledgw, and skill instruments.

Keywords: factor analysis, teacher’s difficulty, integrated thematic teaching

Keywords


faktor-faktor; kesulitan guru; pembelajaran tematik integratif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberta. (2010). Making a difference: Meeting diverse learning needs with differentiated instruction. Edmonton: Alberta Education.

Arends, R. I. (2013). Belajar untuk mengajar. learning to teach. Jakarta Salemba Humanika.

Akbar, S. & Sriwiyana, H. (2012). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial. Yogyakarta: Cipta Media.

Arthur, J., Graigner, T & Wray, D. (2006). Learning to teach in the primary school. New York: Routledge.

Ayoti, C., et al. (2012). Factors influencing preparation and utilization of instruc-tional media in teaching kiswahili in selected public secondary schools in Kenya. Greener Journal Of Education Research, 3, 108-114.

Bagnato, S. J. (2007) . Authentic assessmentfor early childhoodintervention. New York: The Guilford Press.

Bucholz, J. L. & Sheffler J. L. (2009). Creating warm and inclusive classroom environ-ment: planning for all children to feel welcome. Electronic Journal For Inclusive Education, 2, 2-13.

Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. & Metcalf, K. K. (2014). Perilaku mengajar edisi ke-6. Jakarta Selatan: Salemba Humanika.

Chankook, K. & Rosanne W. F. (2006). Issue-specific barriers to addressing environmental issues in the classroom: an exploratory study. Spring, 37, 15-22.

Chumo, C. C. (2014). Effeect of practical in investigation on scientific creativity amongst secondary schools biology students in kericho district, Kenya. Journal Of Education And Practice, 8, 43-51.

Daryanto & Sudjendro, H. (2014). Siap menyongsong kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Djamarah, S. B & Zain, A. (2013). Strategi bel-ajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Diane, T. R. (2007). Integrative learning. Journal Of Enginering Education, 3, 275-277.

Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Evans, J. M. & Cain, S. E. 1990. Sciencing: an involvement approach to elementary science methods 3rd edition. Colombus: merill publishing company.

Felder, R. M & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Jurnal Of Enginering Education, 94(1), 57-72.

Gibbs, G. & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Sage Publications, 5,87-100.

Gurney, P. (2007). Five factors for effective teaching. New Zealand. Journal of Teachers’ Work. 4, 2, 89-98.

Hamalik, O. (2009). Dasar-dasar pengembang-an kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hannah, R. (2013). The effect of classroom environment on student learning. Honor. Paper: 2375.

Jacobs, H. H. (2009). Essential education for a changing world. Alexandria: ASCD.

Killen, R. (2009). Effective teaching strategies. Albany: Cengage Learning.

Kim, D. & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of tex, audio, and grafhic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society. 11 (3), 114-126.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kline, P. (2008). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routlege.

Majid, A. (2009). Perencanaan pembelajaran : mengembangkan standar kompetensi guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: MITRA CENDEKIA.

McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assesment principles and practice for effective standars-based instruction. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Ming-Tak, H And Wai-shing L. (2008): Classroom management: creating a positive learning environment: Aberdeen: Hongkong University Press.

Min, K. C., Rashid, A. M., & Nazri, M. I. (2012). Teacher’s understanding and practice towards thematic approach in teaching integrated living skill (ILS) in Malaysia. International Journal Of Humanities And Social Science: 23, 273-281.

Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2008). Effective teaching teori dan aplikasi. (Terjemahan Soetjipto, H. P., & Soetjipto, S. M). London (Buku Asli Diterbitkan 2008).

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Munadi, Y. (2013). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta Selatan: GP Press Group.

Nasution. (2005). Asas-asas kurikulum. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Nurseto, T. (2011). Membuat media pembelajaran yang menarik. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, Volume 8 Nomor 1, April 2011.

Pasa, A.E., et al. (2008). Design and use of instructional materials for student-centered learning: a case in learning ecological concepts. The Asia Fasific Education Researcher, 17, (109-120).

Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assesment what teachers need to know. London: Allyn & Bacon

Popham, W. J. & Baker, E.L. (2005). Bagaimana mengajar secara sistematis. Diterjemahkan oleh R.H. Dj. Sinurat et al. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sessoms, D. (2008). Interactive instruction: creating interactive learning environments through tomorrow’s teachers. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 86-96.

Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan media pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pedagogia

Susilana, R & Riyana C. (2008). Media pembelajaran: Hakikat, pengembang-an, pemanfaatan dan penilaian. Bandung: Kurtekpend FIP UPI.

Supranto, J. 2004. Analisis multivariat arti dan isi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Trianto, (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu: konsep, strategi dan implementasinya dalam kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Trianto. (2011). Desain pengembangan pembelajaran tematik bagi anak usia dini TK/RA & anak kelas awal SD/MI. Jakarta: Kencana.

Warso, A. W. D. D. (2013). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu dan penilaiannya pada sekolah dasar/madrasah ibtidaiyah sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Graha Galia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v3i2.6504

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Jurnal Prima Edukasia indexed by:

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 2338-4743 |e-ISSN: 2460-9927

Creative Commons LicenseJurnal Prima Edukasia by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Prima Edukasia Journal Stats