UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE THROUGH WEBSITE DISCLOSURE

Amelia Setiawan, Parahyangan Catholic University, Indonesia
Chatherine Melinda,
Gery Lusanjaya,
Damajanti Tanumihardja,

 10.21831/jk.v3i1.16189

Abstract


This study was aimed at identifying university’s disclosure about their management through their websites. Completeness of information in this report should be made to improve transparency of information. This study was conducted through observation on the website and data collection on relevant regulations and literature studies to support this research. This study used 50 universities as samples. The sample selection used was purposive sampling method. The ten domains studied included identity, tridharma, governance, academics, public recognition, actuality, accessibility, stakeholders, internal facilities, and external facilities. The results show that the university website from Java region disclose more adequate than outside Java. While based on accreditation, universities with “A” accreditation disclose more adequate compared to “B” accreditation. Based on the type, State Universities disclose more adequate than private universities. Conclusions of this study, there are many universities that do not fully disclose the information on their website. And this should be a concern for every university and regulator.

Transparansi Pengelolaan PERGURUAN TINGGI melalui Penyajian Informasi pada Situs web

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengamati transparansi perguruan tinggi (PT) mengenai pengelolaan operasinya melalui situs web. Kelengkapan informasi pelaporan ini perlu diperhatikan untuk meningkatkan transparansi informasi. Penelitian deskriptif dilakukan melalui observasi pada situs web dan pengumpulan data atas regulasi yang relevan serta studi literatur untuk mendukung penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan 50 PT sebagai sampel. Pemilihan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling method. Sepuluh domain yang diteliti mencakup identitas, tridharma, tata kelola, akademik, pengakuan publik, aktualitas, aksesibilitas, stakeholders, fasilitas internal, dan fasilitas eksternal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa situs web Perguruan Tinggi yang berasal dari wilayah Jawa mengungkapkan lebih memadai dibandingkan dengan wilayah di luar Jawa. Adapun berdasarkan akreditasi, Perguruan Tinggi yang memiliki akreditasi “A” mengungkapkan lebih memadai dibandingkan dengan yang memiliki akreditasi “B”. Berdasarkan jenisnya Perguruan Tinggi negeri memiliki kelengkapan informasi lebih memadai dibandingkan Perguruan Tinggi swasta. Kesimpulan penelitian ini, masih terdapat banyak Perguruan Tinggi yang tidak mengungkapan secara lengkap informasi pada situs web, dan semestinya menjadi perhatian bagi setiap Perguruan Tinggi dan juga regulator. 


Keywords


pengungkapan, transparansi, situs web Perguruan Tinggi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017, march 3). Pendidikan. Retrieved from Badan Pusat Statistik: https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/1840

BBC. (2016, October 27). BBC. Retrieved from BBC: www.bbc.com

BBC Indonesia. (2016, October 27). ICW: Dugaan suap di pemilihan rektor karena hak kewenangan dana yang besar di PTN. Retrieved from bbc.com: http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-37781177

Beck, C., Dumay, J., & Frost, G. (2017). In Pursuit of a ‘Single Source of Truth’: from Threatened Legitimacy to Integrated Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 191-205.

Culkin, N., Smith, D., & Fletcher, J. (1999). Meeting the information needs of marketing in the twenty-first century. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 6-12.

Dobbins, M., & Khachatryan, S. (2015). Europeanization in the ‘‘Wild East’’? Analyzing higher education governance reform in Georgia and Armenia. Higher Education, 189-207.

Feldioreanu, I.-A., & Seria, r. (2015). Corporate governance disclosure of banks in Romania and Malaysia and the quality of the web sites. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 193-216.

(2015). G20/OECD Principle of Corporate Governance. Turkey.

Gallego-Alvarez, I., Rodrıguez-Domınguez, L., & Garcıa-Sanchez, I.-M. (2011). Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors. Online Information Review, 360-385.

Goodman, S. K. (1993). Information Needs for Management Decison-Making. ARMA Record Management Quarterly, 12-22.

Haat, M. H., Rahman, R. A., & Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies. Managerial Auditing Journa, 744-778.

James, M. L. (2013). SUSTAINABILITY AND INTEGRATED REPORTING: OPPORTUNITIES AND STRATEGIES FOR SMALL AND MIDSIZE COMPANIES. Entrepreneurial Executive, 17-30.

Jarocka, M. (2015). TRANSPARENCY OF UNIVERSITY RANKINGS IN THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF UNIVERSITY. Business, ManageMent and education, 64-75.

Jiang, Y., Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2009). Web-Based Corporate Governance Information Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation. Information Resources Management Journal, 50-68.

Kemp, S. (2017, February 16). Digital in Southeast Asia 2017. Retrieved from wearesocial.com: https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-southeast-asia-2017

Lyytinen, K., & Grover, V. (2017). Management Misinformation Systems: A Time to Revisit? Journal of Association for Information Systems, 206-230.

Magalhaes, A., Veiga, A., Ribeiro, F. M., Sousa, S., & Santiago, R. (2013). Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance. Hiugher education, 95-112.

Maharsi, S. (2000). Pengaruh Perkembangan Tekonologi Informasi terhadap Bidang Akuntansi Manajemen. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Vol. 2, No. 2.

Malhotra, P., & Makkar, R. (2012). A Study of Corporate Web Reporting Practices in India. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, XI(1), 7-19.

Maniora, J. (2017). Is Integrated Reporting Really the Superior Mechanism for the Integration of Ethics into the Core Business Model? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 755-786.

Marais, S. v. (2014). Corporate governance, integrated reporting, and stakeholder management: A case study of Eskom. African Journal of Business Ethics, 31-57.

Mardapi, D., Haryanto, & Hadi, S. (2012). Pengujian Hasil Belajar dan Penilaian Pendidikan Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Kependidikan, 130-143.

Medina, C., & Rufín, R. (2015). Transparency policy and students’ satisfaction and trust. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 309-323.

Menon, M. E. (2003). Student Involvement in University Governance: A Need for Negotiated Educational Aims? Tertiary Education and Management, 233-247.

Mio, C. (2015). Management by objectives and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 325-364.

Needles, B. E., Turel, A., Sengur, E. D., & Turel, A. (2012). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TURKEY: ISSUES AND PRACTICES OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPANIES. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 510-531.

O'Brian, J., & Marakas, G. M. (2011). Management Information System (ed.10). USA.

Octaria, D., Zulkardi, & Somakim. (2013). Pengembangan Website Bahan Ajar Turunan Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Kependidikan, 107-115.

Oehler, A., & Wendt, S. (2017). Good Consumer Information: the Information Paradigm at its (Dead) End? Journal of Consumer Policy, 179-191.

Paat, Y. (2016, October 30). Hukum/beritasatu.com. Retrieved from Beritasatu.com: http://www.beritasatu.com/hukum/395846-icw-temukan-37-kasus-dugaan-korupsi-di-perguruan-tinggi.html

Peters, M. A. (2013). MANAGERIALISM AND THE NEOLIBERAL UNIVERSITY: PROSPECTS FOR NEW FORMS OF “OPEN MANAGEMENT” IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 11-26.

Priyambodo, E., Wiyarsi, A., & Sari, R. L. (2012). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Web Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 99-109.

Raharja, S., Prasojo, L. D., & Nugroho, A. A. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Learning Management Systems dengan Pengembangan Software Moodle di SMA Negeri Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kependidikan, 55-70.

Rey-Garcia, M., Martin-Cavanna, J., & Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2012). Assessing and Advancing Foundation Transparency: Corporate Foundations as a Case Study. The Foundation Review, 77-92.

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2012). Accounting Information System. Pearson Education.

Roohani, S., Furusho, Y., & Koizumi, M. (2009). XBRL: Improving transparency and monitoring functions of corporate governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 355-369.

Rosca, I., Nastase, P., & Mihai, F. (2010). Information Systems Audit for University Governance in Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies. Informatica Economica, 21-33.

Samaha, K., & Abdallah, S. (2012). Further evidence on web-based corporate disclosures in developed versus developing countries: A comparative analysis of nature and determinants in Egypt and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 9(2), 148-180.

Sanabria, F. A. (2012). CSR and CSR Reporting: Reporting as a way to Create Socially Responsible Business. Mercatoria, 123-164.

Satu, B. (2016, October 30). ICW Temukan 37 Kasus Dugaan Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Retrieved from Berita Satu: www.beritasatu.com

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Method for Business. Haddington: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Smith, D., & Culkin, N. (2011). Making Sense of Information: A New Role for The marketing Researcher. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 263-273.

Social, W. A. (2015). Retrieved from We Are Social: www.wearesocial.com

Tinggi, U.-U. R. (2012). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia no 1 tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Accountability.org: Online Disclosures by U.S. Nonprofits. Voluntas, 693-719.

Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009). Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics of Information Technology, 113-122.

Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009). ICT and an NGO: Difficulties in attempting to be extremely transparent. Ethics of Information Technology, 221-231.

Webometric. (2017, July 4). Webometric. Retrieved from Webometric: http://www.webometrics.info/en/Objetives




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v3i1.16189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533

Indexed by:

          

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats