WEBSITE-BASED TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT KNOWLEDGE FOR LEARNING PREPARATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS

Insih Wilujeng; Nugan Tadeko; Wipsar Sunu Brams Dwandaru

doi:10.21831/cp.v39i3.31228

WEBSITE-BASED TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT KNOWLEDGE FOR LEARNING PREPARATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS

Insih Wilujeng, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nugan Tadeko, Universitas Tadolako, Indonesia
Wipsar Sunu Brams Dwandaru, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/cp.v39i3.31228

Abstract

This study produces technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) instruments, which conventionally use print modules. The aims of this study were 1) to develop appropriate website-based TPACK instruments, and 2) to determine the effect of the produced website-based TPACK instruments toward the pedagogy competence of Science teachers in their learning preparation in the classroom. The methodology used was based on the ADDIE stages which stand for analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. The results of this study include 1) instructions for producing TPACK instruments based on the results of synthesis; 2) instructions for making a website format based on the synthesis results; 3) TPACK framework design in website content; 4) TPACK instruments validation results; and 5) website validation results. Moreover, limited and field tests were conducted upon the website-based TPACK instruments to determine their effect toward the pedagogy competence of Science teachers. Quantitatively, the TPACK instruments scored 70 out of 76, while the website scored 60 out of 90. Finally, the limited and field tests results showed that website-based TPACK instruments positively affect the pedagogy competence of Science teachers in their learning preparation in the classroom with an overall Good category and a Very Good category for the usage evaluation from the users.

Keywords

website based-TPACK; science teacher; learning preparation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akhyar, M. (2017). Pengembangan media pembelajaran IPA scientific approach on website (science-on-web) untuk meningkatkan kemandirian dan hasil belajar siswa SMP. [Developing learning media of scientific approach on website (science-on-web) to improve self-regulated learning and students learning outcomes at junior high school]. (Master Thesis, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). http://eprints.uny.ac.id/51467.

Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2003). Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. USA: Sloan Consortium (NJ1).

Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2017). Exploring in- and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6113-6131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01053a.

Bajracharya, J. R. (2019). TPACK-integrated worked examples for technology integration. Journal of Training and Development, 4(2019), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.3126/jtd.v4i0.26837.

Balçın, M. D., & Ergün, A. (2017). Science teacher candidates’ views about technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(4), 570-600. http://dergipark.gov.tr/http-eku-comu-edu-tr/issue/31729/347789.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). On-site pedagogical content knowledge development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1246-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1033777.

Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d.

Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806.

Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., Clair, L. St., & Haris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: measuring the TPACK confidence of in-service science teachers. Tech Trends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0.

Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Education Statistics.

Harper, K. A., & de Waters, J. (2008). A quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2008.06.007.

Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/1080/15391523.2011.10782570.

Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2006, July). Planned improvisations: Technology-supported learning activity design in social studies. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Diego, CA. http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2006/program/search_results_details.php?sessionid=13514149.

Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009, 2 March). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Charleston, SC. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/31298.

Hunter, J. (2015). Technology integration and high possibility classrooms building from TPACK. New York, NY: Routledge.

Indonesian Science Educators Association. (2015). Learning outcome. Semarang: Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia.

Jwaid, A. E., Clark, S., & Ireson, G. (2014). Understanding best practices in control engineering education using the concept of TPACK. In Proceeding of 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. Princeton, NJ; IEEE, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891027.

Karolčík, Š., & Čipková, E. (2017). Attitudes among chemistry teachers towards increasing personal competencies in applying ICT. Chemistry Didactics Ecology Metrology, 22(1-2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdem-2017-0006.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303.

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2016). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656848.

Kosasi, S. (2015). Perancangan e-learning untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar guru dan siswa. [The design of e-learning to increase the motivation of learning of teachers and students]. In Proceeding of the Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (SENAPATI). Bali: Undiksa, pp. 82-88. http://www.jurnal.stmikpontianak.ac.id.

Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2012). Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. [Techniques of preparing test and non-test instrument]. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Martin, B. (2015). Successful implementation of TPACK in teacher preparation programs. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2015.4102.

Maryati, Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., & Sumintono, S. (2019). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge using many-facet Rasch model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 452-462. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.26598.

Mokshein, S. E., Ishak H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The use of Rasch measurement model in English testing. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38il.22750.

National Science Teachers Association. (2012). Pre-service science standards. https://www.nsta.org/preservice/docs/2012NSTAPreserviceScienceStandards.pdf.

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2005.03.006.

Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Novkovic-Cvetkovic, B., & Stanojevic, D. (2017). Educational needs of teacher for introduction and application of innovative models in educational work to improve teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1701049N.

Ouyang, F., & Scharber, C. (2018). Adapting the TPACK framework for online teaching within higher education. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 8(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2018010104.

Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(34), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z.

Peters, O. (1967). Distance education and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline. http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/found/peters67.htm.

Purwaningsih, W. P. (2016). Analisis kemampuan guru dalam menerapkan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran menggunakan kerangka TPACK: Study kasus SMA Negeri 1 Tengaran. [Analysis of the ability of teachers to apply the use of information and communication technology in learning using the TPACK framework: Case study at SMA Negeri 1 Tengaran]. Artikel Ilmiah Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 1-18. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/10769.

Sheffield, R., Dobozy, E., Gibson, D., Mullaney, J., & Campbell, C. (2015). Teacher education students using TPACK in science: A Case Study. Educational Media International, 52(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1075104.

Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.

Sickel, J. L. (2019). The great media debate and TPACK: A multidisciplinary examination of the role of technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1564895.

Syamsuriyanti, S., & Sukirno, S. (2018). Determinant factors of teachers’ professionalism. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.10588.

Tan, L., & Ali, J. (2019). Investigating TPACK as professional knowledge for Australian literacy teachers. The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0235.

Undang-Undang RI 2005 No. 14. Guru dan dosen. [Teacher and lecturer].

Van Driel, J. H., de Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10010.

Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. (2006). Turning visitors into customers: A usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Management Science, 52(3), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0442.

Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2016). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2016.1174730.

White, B., & Geer, R. (2013). Preservice teachers experience with online modules about TPACK. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 124-132.

Widyastono, H. (2016). Pedagogical competence. Surabaya: Genta Group Production.

W3C. (2008). Standards-W3C. https://www.w3.org/standards.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.31228