Pelaksanaan program Edmodo di sekolah dasar
Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pelaksanaan program Edmodo di Sekolah Dasar Percobaan Negeri (SDPN) Sabang dan Sekolah Dasar Kristen (SDK) 5 BPK Penabur kota Bandung. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuali-tatif, desain studi kasus. Subyek penelitian dengan purposive sampling yaitu ambassador, manajer Edmodo Amerika Serikat, guru, siswa, orang tua, kepala SDPN Sabang dan SDK 5 BPK Penabur, pengawas, Kepala Dinas Pendidikan kota Bandung dan staf program sarana dan prasarana. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah wawancara, observasi, dan dokumen. Pengujian keabsahan data adalah teknik triangulasi, member-check, dan audit eksternal oleh dosen pembimbing. Teknik analisis data menggunakan model Creswell. Hasil penelitian mengungkap pelaksanaan program Edmodo yaitu mengkaji dimensi siswa, guru, dan stakeholder yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan program Edmodo. Permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan Edmodo adalah hambatan mindset dan niat, signal, sarana dan prasarana Edmdo, dan limitasi grup.
Abstract
This research aims to describe the implementation of the Edmodo program at Sekolah Dasar Percobaan Negeri (SDPN) Sabang and Sekolah Dasar Kristen (SDK) 5 BPK Penabur Bandung. The research approach was qualitative, case study design. Research subjects with purposive sampling consisted of Ambassador, Edmodo’s United States manager, teachers, students, parents, head of SDPN Sabang and SDK 5 BPK Penabur Bandung, supervisor, head of Bandung Education Office, and staff of infrastructures. The techniques of collecting data were interviews, observation, and documents. The validity testing of data was triangulation, member-checking, and external audits by the lecturer. The analysis data used was qualitative analysis data from Creswell. The results of this research were the implementation of the Edmodo program was to examine the dimensions of students, teachers, and stakeholders involved in the implementation of the Edmodo program. The problem in the implementation was the barrier of mindset and intention, signal, infrastructure, and group limitation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bano, H., Anjum, N., Rahman, F., Sadia, T., & Sarwar, N. (2013). Home-school partnership: A perspective of stakeholders in special education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(7), 96-104. Retrieved from https://journal-archieves36.webs.com/96-104.pdf
Balasubramanian, K., Jaykumar, V., & Fukey, L. N. (2014). A study on “Student preference towards the use of Edmodo as a learning platform to create responsible learning environment”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 144(2014), 416-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.311
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction. United States of America: Pfeiffer A Wiley Imprint.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design fourth edition: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed method approaches. Boston: Pearson.
Danim, S. (2006). Visi baru manajemen sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Darmawan, D. (2014). Inovasi pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Dyches, T. T., Carter, N. J., & Prater, M. A. (2012). A teacher’s guide to communicating with parents. Boston: Pearson Educational, Inc.
Gibson, J. L., Donelly, J. H., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1997). Manajemen edisi kesembilan. (S. Tjiptowardoyo & I. Nurmawan, Trans.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hintz, K., & Genareo, V. (2017). Suggestions for implementing first year experience learning communities in teacher education programs. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 5(1), 2. Retrieved from https://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/lcrpjournal/vol5/iss1/2
Huerta, J. C. (2017). The founding of the learning communities association. Learning Communities: Research & Practice, 5(1), 7. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150388.pdf
Kunandar, K. (2007). Guru profesional implementasi kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) dan sukses dalam seertifikasi guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. J. (2006). The principalship: Vision to action. USA: Wadsworth.
Mulyasa, E. (2015). Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Musfah, J. (2015). Manajemen pendidikan: Teori, kebijakan, dan praktik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Pujiriyanto, P. (2012). Teknologi pengembangan media dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta. UNY Press.
Rahma, A., & Jonyanis, J. (2015). Pengaruh penggunaan smartphone terhadap aktifitas kehidupan siswa (Studi Kasus MAN 1 Rengat Barat). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 2(2), 1-12. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/32729-ID-pengaruh-penggunaan-smartphone-terhadap-aktifitas-kehidupan-siswa-studi-kasus-ma.pdf
Sugiyono, S. (2015). Metode penelitian pedidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryosubroto, S. (2000). Humas dalam dunia pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Mitra Gama Media.
Uno, H. B. & Mohamad, N. (2013). Belajar dengan pendekatan paikem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Usman, H. (2013). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Whitehead, B. M., Bosche, F., & Decker, R. H. (2013). The principal: Leadership for a global society. Los Angles: Sage Publications, Inc.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. (4th ed.). California, Sage Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v8i1.30589
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal indexed by:
ISSN 2461-0550 (online) || ISSN 2337-7895 (print)
Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jamp is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |