Self-directed learning readiness of automotive body repair student to face 4.0 learning system

Atmoko Putra Pratama; Herminarto Sofyan; Aan Yudianto

doi:10.21831/jpv.v12i1.27447

Self-directed learning readiness of automotive body repair student to face 4.0 learning system

Atmoko Putra Pratama, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Herminarto Sofyan, (Scopus ID: 57194626818) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Aan Yudianto, (Scopus ID: 57211951692) Politecnico di Torino, Italy

10.21831/jpv.v12i1.27447

Abstract

This study aims to reveal: 1.) Readiness of independent learning of vocational students in the department of automotive body repair to face 4.0 learning systems; and 2.) Supporting and inhibiting factors of students in implementing a 4.0 learning system. This study uses a descriptive-analytical method with a case study approach. The subject consisted of students and teachers of vocational high school majoring in automotive body repair. Data collection techniques in this study were observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The research was conducted at SMK N 2 Depok Sleman, automotive body repair engineering department. 30 respondents filled out the questionnaire to assess the level of self-directed learning readiness of respondents according to SDLR. The readiness level of self-directed learning is divided into three categories: low, medium, and high. The results of this study are (1) Readiness of students majoring in automotive body repair techniques in the face of learning systems 4.0 is included in the medium category, and (2) The supporting and inhibiting factors found in dealing with learning systems 4.0 come from internal and external of the student learning environment.

Keywords

4.0 Learning System; automotive; body repair; vocational

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agustini, K., Sindu, I. G. P., & Kusuma, K. A. (2019). The effectiveness of content based on dynamic intellectual learning with visual modality in vocational school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.21629

Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press.

Aruan, N. (2015). Gambaran kesiapan self directed learning pada mahasiswa tahap pendidikan klinik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah dan faktor-faktor yang berhubungan [Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/26404

Bukit, M. (2014). Vocational education strategy and innovation: From competence to competition. Alfabeta.

Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069

Darmayanti, T. (1995). Readiness for self-directed learning and achievement of the students of Universitas Terbuka (The Indonesian Open Learning University) [University of Victoria]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5656320

Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. (1991). Expanding your readiness for self-directed learning: A workbook for the Learning Preference Assessment. Organization Design and Development Inc.

Hiryanto, H. (2017). Pedagogi, andragogi dan heutagogi serta implikasinya dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 22(1), 65–70. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dinamika-pendidikan/article/view/19771

Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2013). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Routledge.

Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005

Majid, N. W. A., & Ridwan, T. (2019). Development of the traditional digital games for strengthening childhood’s verbal skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.22802

Muslim, S., Utami, N. R., Ismawati, R., Rahmadyanti, E., Kusumawati, N., & Rus, R. C. (2019). The effect of ARIAS learning model on the learning outcomes about continental food processing in Bogor 3 State Vocational Schools from creativity of students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.22894

Narayan, V., Herrington, J., & Cochrane, T. (2019). Design principles for heutagogical learning: Implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3941

Prosser, C. A., & Allen, C. R. (1925). Vocational education in a democrazy. Century Company.

Purwasih, R., & Rahimmulaily, R. (2019). Analysis of difficulty level of information system students in communicating English in industrial era 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.22761

Pusriawan, P., & Soenarto, S. (2019). Employability skills of vocational school students in Palu City for entering the work world. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.23351

Speech by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel at the VIIIth Petersberg Climate Dialogue. (2017). Bundeskanzler.De. https://www.bundeskanzler.de/bk-en/news/speech-by-federal-chancellor-angela-merkel-at-the-viiith-petersberg-climate-dialogue-418462

Stockdale, S. L., & Brockett, R. G. (2010). Development of the PRO-SDLS: A measure of self-direction in learning based on the personal responsibility orientation model. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610380447

Wardani, R. (2018). 21st century educator: Menyongsing transformasi pendidikan 4.0. Seminar Nasional Dinamika Informatika 2018. https://docplayer.info/94121653-21-st-century-educator-menyongsong-transformasi-pendidikan-4-0.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v12i1.27447