Kemampuan guru SMKN program keahlian teknik bangunan dalam mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013

Sutarto Hadiprayitno

doi:10.21831/jpv.v6i3.11440

Kemampuan guru SMKN program keahlian teknik bangunan dalam mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013

Sutarto Hadiprayitno, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jpv.v6i3.11440

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) tanggapan guru terhadap prinsip-prinsip pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013; (2) kemampuan guru dalam menyusun rencana pembelajaran (RPP); (3) kemampuan guru dalam melaksanakan proses belajar dan mengajar; dan (4) kemampuan guru dalam menilai hasil belajar menurut Kurikulum 2013 pada Program Keahlian Teknik Bangunan SMKN di Kota Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian evaluasi. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah guru SMKN Program Keahlian Teknik Bangunan di Kota Yogyakarta yang berjumlah 70 orang. Sampel penelitian diperoleh secara quota random sampling dan diperoleh sejumlah 36 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan angket dan dokumen RPP. Validitas logis angket diperoleh melalui penilaian ahli. Data angket dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif selanjutnya dicek silang dengan analisis kualitas deskripsi komponen-komponen RPP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) tanggapan guru terhadap prinsip-prinsip pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 termasuk dalam kategori setuju; (2) kemampuan guru menyusun RPP termasuk dalam kategori memadai; (3) kemampuan guru melaksanakan proses belajar-mengajar termasuk dalam kategori memadai; dan (4) kemampuan guru melaksanakan penilaian hasil belajar siswa juga termasuk dalam kategori memadai.

Kata kunci: Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan, kurikulum 2013, dan pembelajaran.

TEACHERS’ ABILTY OF BUILDING TECHNIQUE SPEZIALIZATION PROGRAM OF STATE VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL IN IMPLEMENTING CURRICULUM 2013

Abstract

The aim of this study were to know: (1) teachers’ respons to curriculum 2013 principles; (2) teachers’ ability in developing teaching plan (RPP); (3) teachers’ ability in implementing teaching and learning process; and (4) teachers’ ability in assessing students’ learning outcome based on curriculum 2013 of Building Tecnique Spezialization Program State Vocational High School in Yogyakarta City. This study was an evaluation study. Population of this study was State Vocational High School Teachers of Building Technique Spezialization Program in Yogyakarta City that were 70 teachers. While, sample was determine by quota random sampling and resulted 36 teachers. Collecting data technique were questionnaire and documention of lesson plan. Logical Validity of questionnaire was done by expert judgment. Questionnaire data analyzed using statistical and qualitative descriptive techniques, then those results were cross-checked by quality analysis of RPP components’ description. The study results were: (1) teachers’ respons to curriculum 2013 learning principles was moderate; (2) teachers’ ability in developing teaching plan was adequate; (3) teachers’ ability in implementing teaching plan was adequate; and (4) teachers’ ability in assessing students’ learning outcome was also adequate.

Keywords: Vocational High School, curriculum 2013, and learning

Keywords

Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan; kurikulum 2013; pembelajaran; Vocational High School; curriculum 2013; learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bolognese, A. F. (2002). Employee resistance to organizational change. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from http://www.newfoundations.com/OrgT heory/Bolognese721.html

Daulay, M. (2016). Persepsi guru pendidikan agama islam (pai) terhadap implementasi Kurikulum 2013. In Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Depdikbud (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomer 65 tahun 2013tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Amir Samsudin.

Depdikbud (2014). Peraturan Meneteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomer 103 tahun 2013 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Ani Nurdiani Azizah, Karo Hukum dan Organisasi

Depdikbud (2014). Peraturan Meneteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomer 104 tahun 2014tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Amir Samsudin, Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI.

Depdikbud (2015). Peraturan Meneteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomer 53 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Widodo Ekatjahjana, Dirjen Perundang-undangan Kemenhumham RI.

Faqih, M. (2014). Mendikbud jelaskan kurikulum 2013 di London. Republika. Ad. Retrieved from http://www.republika.co.id/berita/pendi dikan/eduaction/14/01/21/mzrayx- mendikbud-jelaskan-kurikulum-2013- di-london

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five- dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Hartoyo. (2015). Kesiapan guru SMK di kota yogyakarta dalam mengimplementasikan kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Ikatan Alumni (IKA) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: IKAUNY Press.

Jaedun, A., Hariyanto, V. L., & Raharjo, N. E. (2014). Kesiapan guru smk program keahlian teknik bangunan di daerah istimewa yogyakarta dalam mengimplementasikan kurikulum 2013. In Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/p enelitian/nuryadin-eko-raharjo- spdmpd/penelitian-2014-kesiapan-guru- smk-dalam-implementasi-k-2013.pdf

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction. New York: Wiley Pub.

Nasution, S. (2010). Kurikulum dan pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Rasul, M. S., Rauf, R. A. A., & Nor, A. R. M. (2014). future employability skills sets for manufacturing industries. iIternational Education Studies, 7(10).

Roekel, D. Van. (2010). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: an educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.” New York: NEA Pub.

Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10079992045 43

Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i3.11440