PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI UJI KOMPETENSI KEAHLIAN (UKK) ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN DI SMK

Suranto Suranto; Muhyadi Muhyadi; Djemari Mardapi

doi:10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI UJI KOMPETENSI KEAHLIAN (UKK) ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN DI SMK

Suranto Suranto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Muhyadi Muhyadi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Djemari Mardapi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen yang cocok untuk melakukan evaluasi penyelenggaraan kegiatan UKK administrasi perkantoran di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Penelitian pengembangan ini mencakup empat tahapan utama, yaitu tahap pendahuluan, tahap perencanaan dan pengembangan, tahap uji coba evaluasi dan revisi, serta tahap implementasi. Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian ini menggunakan teknik focus group discussion, angket/kuesioner, wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumen. Analisis data dengan responden siswa menggunakan program Lisrel 8.51 dan data dengan responden guru dianalisis menggunakan SPSS 17.00 for Windows. Hasil penelitian ini sebagai berikut: (1) komponen penyelenggaraan UKK mencakup: (a) kolaborasi sekolah dengan asosiasi profesi dan DU/DI; (b) kinerja asesor; (c) sarana prasarana penunjang UKK; (d) sikap siswa terhadap UKK; (e) informasi capaian kompetensi siswa; dan (f) pengakuan legal asosiasi profesi dan DU/DI. (2) hasil pengujian menunjukkan: (a) instrumen dengan responden siswa berdasarkan data uji coba pada tahap implementasi, seluruh instrumen valid, reliabel, dan memenuhi syarat sebagai model yang fit; (b) instrumen dengan responden guru pada tahap implementasi menunjukkan seluruh butir instrumen memiliki nilai validitas > 0,30 dan memenuhi kriteria KMO > 0,50 serta koefisien reliabilitas α > 0,70.

Kata kunci: pengembangan, instrumen evaluasi, uji kompetensi keahlian

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS OF THE OFFICE ADMINISTRATION EXPERTISE COMPETENCY TEST IN VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS

Abstract This study aims to develop an evaluation instruments which is appropriate to evaluate the implementation of the Expertise Competency Test (ECT) for the Office Administration Expertise in vocational high schools (VHSs). This developmental research includes four major stages, namely the preliminary stage, the planning and development stage, the trial stage for evaluation and revision, as well as the implementation stage. For the data collection techniques, this study used focus group discussion, questionnaire, interview, observation, and document study. The data analysis for the students' responds was carried out using Lisrel Program version 8.51., while that for the teachers' responds was carried out using SPSS version 17.00 for Windows. The results of the study are as follows. 1) the components of the ECT activities include: (a) the collaboration of the schools and professional associations and the Business Sector/Industrial Sector (BS/IS); (b) the assessors’ performances; (c) infrastructure facilities supporting the ECT; (d) students’ attitudes towards the ECT; (e) the information about the students’ attainments, and (f) the legal recognition from professional associations and the Business Sector/Industrial Sector or the BS/IS. 2) The study showed that: (a) based on the tryout data in the implementation stage, all items in the instrument with student respondents were valid, reliable, and qualified as a fit model; (b) on the implementation stage, all items in the instrument with teacher respondents had the validity value > 0.3 and, therefore, met the criteria of KMO >0.5 and the coefficient of reliability α > 0.70.

Keywords: development, evaluation instrument, expertise competency test

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References

Cox, J. (2006). The quality of an instructional program. National Education Associa- tion-Alaska. Diambil tanggal 23 Fe- bruari 2009, dari http://www.ak.nea. org./excellence/coxquality

Crawford, D.C. (2006). “Suggestions to As- sess Nonformal Education Prog- rams” dalam ProQuest Education Jour- nals.

Cullingford, C. (2000). Assessment versus eva- luation. London. Cassell.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. (2009). Surat Edaran Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor: 351/C.C5/MN/2007 tentang Uji Kom- petensi Keahlian Kejuruan. Diambil tang- gal 22 Mei 2008 dari http://209.85. 175.104/ditpsmk.net/ 2008.

. (2011). Petunjuk teknis pe- laksanaan ujian kompetensi keahlian SMK tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Jakarta: Ditjen Pendidikan Menengah.

Djojonegoro, W. (1998). Pengembangan SDM melalui SMK. Jakarta: PT Jayakarta Agung Offset.

Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen,

B.R. (2011). Program evaluation alter- native approaches and practical guidelines. Boston: Pearson.

Hair, J.F. et.al. (2010). Multivariate data analysis 7th edition. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall

Ghozali, Imam. (2005). Structural equation modeling, Teori, konsep dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 8,80. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2008). Edu- cational research quantitative, quali- tative, and mixed approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Mardapi, Djemari. (2005). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Offset.

Mizikaci, F. (2007). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. ProQuest Educa- tion Journals. 130 (125-140).

Nurosis. (1986). SPSS/PC+for the imbbc/xt/ at. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Royse, D., Thyer, B. & Padgett, D., (2010). Program evaluation in introduction. Bel- mont: Wadsworth.

Sanders, J.R. & Sullins, C.D. (2006). Eva- luation school programs an educator’s guide. California: Corwin Press.

Shavelson, R.J. (2001). Steps in designing an indicator system (versi elektronik). Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Diambil tanggal 14 April 2013 dari http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n.

Sigalingging, Karmon. (2009). Model evaluasi kreativitas lomba kompetensi siswa SMK. Disertasi Doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127