EFEKTIVITAS STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN “K-W-L TEACHING MODEL” UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI TEKS

Harun Rasyid,
M. Asrori,

 10.21831/pep.v11i1.1418

Abstract


Fenomena secara umum menunjukkan bahwa siswa Sekolah Dasar pada umumnya belum memiliki kemampuan membaca dan memahami teks secara komprehensif. Kemampuan membaca dan memahami teks pada anak-anak Sekolah Dasar merupakan sarana yang sangat mendasar dan penting bagi perkembangan di masa mendatang untuk memburu, menyerap, dan memanfaatkan informasi guna pengembangan ilmu dan teknologi ketika kelak mereka mencapai tingkat pendidikan yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas model pembelajaran ”K-W-L” untuk menambah kapasitas dan kemampuan siswa sekolah dasar dalam memahami teks secara komprehensif. Disain penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah disain eksperimen dengan pendekatan pretest-posttest control group design. Penetapan sampel dilakukan dengan cara stratified proportional area random sampling. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran ”K-W-L” sangat efektif untuk menambah kapasitas dan kemampuan siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam membaca dan memahami teks bacaan pada mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, tetapi kurang efektif untuk mata pelajaran Matematika dan Sains Dasar.

Kata kunci: motivasi, dan partisipasi pembelajaran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R.C. (1997). “The Notion of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise”. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, edited by Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Sapiro, and William E. Montague, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Anderson, R.C. and Pichert, J.W. (1998). “Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective”.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.

Berk, L.E. (1996). “Relationship of Elementary School Children‟s Private Speech to Behavioral Accompaniment to Task, Attention, and Task Performance”.Developmental Psychology, 22, 671-680.

Bjorklund, D.F. & DeMarchena, M.R. (1994). “Developmental Shifts in the Basis of Organizational Memory: The Role of Associative versus Categorical Relatedness in Children‟sFree Recall”.Child Development, 55, 952-962.

Bjorklund, D.F. & Hock, H.S. (1992). “Age Differences in the Temporal Locus of Memory Organization in Children‟s Recall”.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 347-362.Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bransfort, J. (1993). “Schema Activation-Schema Acquisition”. In Learning to Read in American Schools, Edited by Richard C. Anderson, Jean Osborn, and Robert C. Tierney, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Depdiknas R.I. (2001). Rencana Strategis Departemen Pendidikan Nasional 2000-2004. Jakarta: Kalangan Terbatas.

Duffy, G.G. (1993). From Turn Taking to Sense Making: Classroom Factors and Improve Reading Achievement. Occasional Paper No.59 East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.

Durkin, D. (1994). “Is There a Match Between What Elementary Teachers Do and What Basal Reader Manuals Recommended?” The Reading Teacher, 37, 734-744.

Gutrie,M. (1999). “Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic of Elementary School”.Comparative Education, 6, 233-256.

Kuczaj, S.A. (1996). “Evidence for a Language Learning Strategy: On The Relative Ease of Acquisition of Prefixes and Suffixes”.Child Development, 50, 1-13.

Kuczaj, S.A. (1997). Thoughts on The Intentional Basis of Early Object Word Extension: Evidence from Comprehension and Production.” In S.A. Kuczaj and M.D. Barret (Eds.), The Development of Word Meaning, New York: Springer-Verlag.

Kuczyinski, L., et al. (1997). “A Developmental Interpretation ofYoung Children‟s Noncompliance”.Developmental Psychology, 23, 799-806.

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Minium, E.W. (1978). Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Nelson, K. (1995). “Private Speech: Learning Out Loud”.Psychology Today, 20, 34-42.

Ogle, D.M. (1996). “K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text”.The Reading Teacher, 12, 564-570.

Popham, W.J. & Sirotnik, K.A., Educational Statistics: Use and Interpretation,Second Edition, Harper & Row Publisher, New York, 1973.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v11i1.1418

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics