Efektifitas Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

Nikmah Nor Hidayah, Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia
Irfan Wahyu Prananto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to analyze how effective the cycle learning model is towards student mathematics learning achievement by using puzzle mathematics media. This research is an experimental quantitative study carried out in class IV Gondosari Public Elementary School. The design of this research is the static group pretest-posttest desaign. The average mathematics achievement test results were 57.6 for the control class and 67.5 for the experimental class. The prerequisite test shows that the data are normally distributed and homogeneous. The research hypothesis test shows: (1) there is a difference in the average test of learning achievement (knowledge and skills) of mathematics between the experimental class and the control class that is 3,291> 1,997; and (2) puzzle cycle assisted learning cycle cannot meet the classical effectiveness criteria.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb’s experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283–294.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dixon, N. M. (2017). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. Routledge.

Fuadi, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2016). Peningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis melalui pendekatan kontekstual. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(1), 47–54.

Gazali, A., Hidayat, A., & Yuliati, L. (2015). Efektivitas Model Siklus Belajar 5E Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 3(1), 10–16.

Juwadi, I. (2013). Penerapan Media Permainan Puzzle Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Anak Tunagrahita Ringankelas I Di SLB/C TPA JEMBER. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 1(1).

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian pendidikan matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary school science and beyond. ERIC.

Prananto, I. W. (2018). Media Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Macromedia Flash 8 yang Berkualitas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: “Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Pada Siswa Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Global” Kudus, 11 April 2018, 203–207. Kudus: Universitas Muria Kudus.

Salim Nahdi, D. (2015). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Brain Based Learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 1(1).

Samsudi. (2009). Desain Penelitian Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang Press.

Sugiyono, M. P. P. (2007). Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Kualitatif, Dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umar, W. (2012). Membangun kemampuan komunikasi matematis dalam pembelajaran matematika. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 1–9.

Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s learning cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304–319.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v2i2.28101

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v2i2.28101.g13083

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Nikmah Nor Hidayah, Irfan Wahyu Prananto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats