Email this article 
VOCATIONAL AND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS IN INDUSTRY 4.0
Sugito Sugito, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Suyanta Suyanta, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Siswantoyo Siswantoyo, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Marwanti Marwanti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
The teacher certification program has been implemented since 2007, yet the society has not optimally experienced the quality improvement of secondary education in Industry 4.0. This study aims to examine vocational and senior high school teacher professionalism in the age of Industry 4.0 in developing learning. This study employed the survey method with quantitative descriptive analysis. The sample of this study was taken from two provinces in Indonesia, namely Yogyakarta Special Region and West Borneo. The data were collected from 113 vocational and senior high school teachers using random purposive sampling. The instruments used in this research were open-ended and close-ended questionnaires. The results of this study show that there is still a low number of teachers with a Master’s degree; however, teachers participate in various capacity building training programs. Moreover, the most common training programs for the teachers are on classroom action research, scientific journal publications, curriculum development, and updating teaching materials. Furthermore, it is found that the number of journal articles published by vocational and senior high school teachers in the two provinces is still low, and as a result, bottleneck problems may occur in their career promotion.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldahmash, A. H., Alshamrani, S. M., Alshaya, F. S., & Alsarrani, N. A. (2019). Research trends in in-service science teacher professional development from 2012 to 2016. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12211a.
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st-century skills and competencies for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD education working papers No. 41). https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.
Atay, D. (2006). Teachers’ professional development: Partnership in research. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 10(2), 1-15. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/.
Barreiro, P. L., & Justo, P. A. (2001). Population and Sample: Sampling Techniques. Spain: MaMaEuSch. http://www.mathematik.unikl.de/˜mamaeusch.
Barry, R. A. (2010). Teaching effectiveness and why it matters. Portland, OR: Marylhurst University and the Chalkboard Project.
Chen, C.-H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.1.65-75.
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2011). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In B. J. Fraser, T. Kenneth, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.). Second international handbook of science education (vol. 1). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 771-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_51.
Craft, A. (1996). Continuing professional development: Practical guide for teachers and schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archive, 8(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000.
Day, C. (2002). Revising the purposes of continuing professional development. In G. Trorey & C. Cullingford. (Eds.). Professional development and institutional needs. London: Routledge, pp. 49-76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315245966.
Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., Ueno, K. (2006). Are teachers who need sustained, content-focused professional development getting it? An administrator’s dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04273848.
Ganser, T. (2002). The new teacher mentors: Four trends that are changing the look of mentoring programs for new teachers. American School Board Journal, 189(12), 25-27.
Gore, V. G. (2013). 21st-century skills and prospective job challenges. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 7(4), 7-14. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2472784.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007.
Hafiar, H., Damayanti, T., Subekti, P., & Fatma, D. (2015). Peningkatan pendidikan dan pengembangan kompetensi guru SMA Negeri 1 Katapang melalui partisipasi dalam publikasi akademis di media massa. [Improving education and developing the competence of teachers of SMA Negeri 1 Katapang through participation in academic publications in the mass media]. Jurnal Aplikasi Ipteks untuk Masyarakat, 4(2), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.24198/dharmakarya.v4i2.10032.
Herold, B. (2015). Why ED-TECH is not transforming teaching: Student-centered, technology-driven instruction remains elusive for most. Education Week, 34(35), 8-14. http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2015/06/11/index.html.
Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD, 6(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.
Khodijah, N. (2013). Kinerja guru madrasah dan guru pendidikan agama islam pasca sertifikasi di Sumatera Selatan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1263.
Law RI 2003 No. 20. Sistem pendidikan nasional. [National education system].
Mizell, H. (2010). Why professional development matters. Oxford: Learning Forward.
Özden, Y. (2010). Öğrenme ve öğretme. Ankara: Pegem.
Permen PAN 2009 No. 16. Jabatan fungsional guru. [Teacher functional position].
Permenristekdikti RI 2017 No. 55. Standar pendidikan guru. [Teacher education standards].
PP RI 2005 No. 19. Standar pendidikan nasional. [National education standards].
Prestridge, S., Tondeur, J., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2019) Insights from ICT-expert teachers about the design of educational practice: The learning opportunities of social media. Technology. Pedagogy, and Education, 28(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1578685.
Rahyasih, Y., Hartini, N., & Syarifah, L. S. (2020). Continuous professional development for teacher through scientific publications. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019). Atlantis Press, pp. 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.206.
Trorey, G. (2002). Meeting the needs of the individual and the institution. . In G. Trorey, & C. Cullingford. (Eds.). Professional development and institutional needs. London: Routledge, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315245966.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32926
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Social Media:
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.
