Evaluation of the Indonesia Pintar Program at the Junior High School Level in Bandung Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v21i2.81351Keywords:
Evaluasi Program, Program Indonesia PintarAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the Indonesia Smart Program (Program Indonesia Pintar/PIP) at the junior high school (SMP) level in Bandung Regency. The evaluation adopts three key dimensions/indicators proposed by William N. Dunn to assess the implementation of PIP in Bandung Regency: (1) Effectiveness, (2) Efficiency, and (3) Equity. These dimensions were chosen due to recurring issues identified in the implementation of PIP. This research employs a qualitative approach with an instrumental case study design, utilizing multiple sources of information, including observations, interviews, audio-visual materials, documentation, and reports during the research process. The study focuses on PIP beneficiaries among junior high school students in Bandung Regency. The findings reveal the analysis of PIP in Bandung Regency based on effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. First, in terms of Effectiveness, PIP has succeeded in reducing the dropout rate among junior high school students but has not significantly increased the transition rate from basic to secondary education in Bandung Regency. Second, regarding Efficiency, PIP lacks regular and tiered socialization and monitoring by program implementers. Additionally, delays in fund disbursement to PIP beneficiaries are common. Third, in the aspect of Equity, the quota distribution for PIP is not allocated based on the distribution of dropout rates across sub-districts. This indicates persistent inequities and uneven distribution of PIP benefits to intended recipients.
References
Agusman, Y. (2019). Implementasi Program Indonesia Pintar di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Kolakaasi Kabuaten Kolaka. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(2), 105–113.
Astuti, D., Febriyanti, D., & Kariem, M. Q. (2023). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar (Pip) Di Kelurahan Tuan Kentang Tahun 2020. TheJournalish: Social and Govverment , 4(3), 249–256.
BPS Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2023). Angka Partisipasi Murni, 2020-2022. BPS Provinsi Jawa Barat. https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/OTcjMg==/angka-partisipasi-murni.html
BPS Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2024). Proyeksi Penduduk Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jawa Barat Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020 (Ribu Jiwa), 2023-2024. BPS Provinsi Jawa Barat. https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/OTIwIzI=/proyeksi-penduduk-kabupaten-kota-provinsi-jawa-barat-hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed (S. Z. Qudsi (ed.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
Desiliani, M., Tahyuddin, D., & Hakim, I. A. (2018). Faktor Penyebab Anak Putus Sekolah Jenjang Smp Di Kelurahan Talang Betutu Kota Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 5(2), 66–77.
Dewi Ulfah Ningsih, & Hasbiah. (2024). Pengaruh Beasiswa Kartu Indonesia Pintar (KIP) Terhadap Kesenjangan Sosial Melalui Aksesibilitas Pendidikan. At-Thariqah: Jurnal Ekonomi, 4(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.47945/at-thariqah.v4i2.1626
Dienul Haq, M., Suharso, P., & Sukidin. (2023). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar (Pip) Melalui Kartu Indonesia Pintar (Kip) Di Mtsn 5 Jember Tahun 2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 17(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v17i1.31537
Dunn, W. N. (2017). Public Policy Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181226
Firah, A., & Azizi, S. A. (2023). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Orangtua Dan Mutu Pendidikan Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Siswa Pada Sd Alwashliyah 4/36 Belawan. Bisnis-Net Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 6(1), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.46576/bn.v6i1.2863
Haqiqi, N. M. Y. A., & Prabawati, I. (2019). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) di SMP Negeri 1 Dawarbandlong Kabupaten Mojokerto. Publika, 7(8), 1–8.
Jumanah, & Rosita, H. (2022). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 8(2), 72–84.
Karningsih, K. (2021). Implementasi Program Indonesia Pintar Di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Public Service and Governance Journal, 2(02), 41. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v2i02.2276
Kemdikbudristek. (2023). Jumlah Distribusi Kuota dan Anggaran PIP Kabupaten Bandung 2018-2023.
Mahfudz. (2015). Jurnal Edu Civic. Media Publikasi Ilmiah Prodi PPKn, 5(01), 21–29.
Maulana, Y. (2021). 5 Kabupaten di Jabar yang Disorot Pusat soal Kemiskinan Ekstrem. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-5745283/5-kabupaten-di-jabar-yang-disorot-pusat-soal-kemiskinan-ekstrem
Nurokhmah. (2021). Program Indonesia Pintar ( PIP ): Implementasi Kebijakan Kesejahteraan dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Angka Partisipasi Pendidikan. 2(1), 37–48.
Purnama, R., & Izzatusholekha, I. (2023). Analisis Program Indonesia Pintar dalam Mengurangi Putus Sekolah di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP), 5(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmiap.v5i1.600
Rohaeni, N. E., & Saryono, O. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Indonesia Pintar ( PIP ) Melalui Kartu Indonesia Pintar ( KIP ) dalam Upaya Pemerataan Pendidikan. Journal of Education Management and Administration Review, 2(1), 193–204.
Rozikin. (2020). Jurnal TAUJIH Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam EFEKTIVITAS PROGRAM INDONESIA PINTAR ( PIP ) DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DI MI DARUSSA ' ADAH GUMAI KECAMATAN GELUMBANG KABUPATEN Jurnal TAUJIH Jurnal Pendidikan Isla. 02(01), 84–110.
Sari, R. P., Studi, P., Anak, P., Dini, U., Agama, I., & Gondanglegi, I. (2021). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Swasta Kecamatan Blimbing Kota Malang Dengan Model CIPPO Program Indonesia Pintar disingkat PIP merupakan program prioritas pemerintah untuk menunjang dan menuntask. August 2020.
Satudata.bandungkab.go.id. (2023). Jumlah penduduk usia sekolah yang tidak bersekolah. Satudata.Bandungkab.Go.Id. https://satudata.bandungkab.go.id/dataset/jumlah-penduduk-usia-sekolah-yang-tidak-bersekolah
Sholikhah, E. (2019). Pemanfaatan Dana Program Indonesia Pintar (Pip) Oleh Siswa Smpn 2 Gedangsari Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Foundasia, 9(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21831/foundasia.v9i1.26160
Sudaisy, F. (2024). Peran Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) dan Keberlanjutan Pendidikan Peserta Didik di SMA Darul Hikmah Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(4), 2325–2330. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i4.2780
Wolff, B., Mahoney, F., Lohiniva, A. L., & Corkum, M. (2019). Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data. In The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual (pp. 213–228). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190933692.003.0010
Yosevina, Tri Murwaningsih, P. N. (2022). 3 1,2,3. 8(17), 206–212.
Yusup, W. B., Ismanto, B., & Wasitohadi, W. (2019). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar dalam Peningkatan Akses Pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i1.p44-53
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
