Keefektifan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT dan GI Ditinjau dari Ketercapaian Standar Kompetensi, Sikap, Minat Matematika

Abd. Haris, Agus Maman Abadi

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan (1) keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT dan GI dan (2) mendeskripsikan perbandingan keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT dan GI ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompetensi, sikap, dan minat siswa terhadap matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Unter Iwes Sumbawa yang terdiri atas 6 kelas. Dua kelas diambil secara acak sebagai sampel, yaitu kelas VII.3 dan VII.4. Kelas VII.3 belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT, sedangkan kelas VII.4 belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe GI. Data penelitian dianalisis dengan uji One sample t test, uji T2 hoteling’s pada signifikansi 5% dan uji Independent t test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pembelajaran matematika dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT dan GI efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompetensi, sikap, dan minat siswa terhadap matematik dan (2) model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe GI ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompetensi, sikap, dan minat siswa terhadap matematika.

Kata Kunci: pembelajaran kooperatif, TGT, GI, ketercapaian standar kompetensi, sikap, minat.

 

The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning of TGT and GI Types in Terms of Achievement of Competence Standard, Attitude, Interest Mathematics

 

Abstract

This study aims to describe (1) the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TGT and GI type and (2) describe the comparison between the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TGT and GI type in terms of achievement of competence standard, attitude, and interest of student toward mathematics. The research population was a Class VII student of SMP Negeri 1 Unter Iwes Sumbawa which consisted of 6 classes. Two classes, namely Class VII.4 and Class VII.3 as the research sample. Class VII.3 learned through the cooperative learning of TGT type and Class VII.4 learned through the cooperative learning of GI type. The data were analyzed using One sample t test, T2 Hoteling’s at the significance level of 5% and Independent t test. The results of the study show that: (1) mathematics learning with cooperative learning model of TGT and GI type is effective in terms of achievement of competence standard, attitude, and interests of student towards mathematic, and (2) cooperative learning model of TGT type is more effective compared with the cooperative learning model of GI type in terms of achievement of competence standard, attitude, and interest of student toward mathematics.

Keywords: cooperative learning, TGT, GI, achievement of competency standard, attitude, interest.

Keywords


cooperative learning; TGT; GI; achievement of competency standard; attitude; interest

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkarim, R., & Jadiry, A.A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning group division based on multiple intelligences theory and previous achievement on scientific thinking skills development of ninth grade students in oman. European Jurnal Of Social Sciences, 27 (4), 553-569.

Akcay, N.O., & Doymus, K. (2012). The effects of group investigation and cooperative learning techniques applied in teaching force and motion subjects on students’ academic achievements. Jurnal of Educational Sciences Re-search, 2 (1), 109-123.

Arends, R. I. (2008). Learning to teach, belajar untuk mengajar. (Terjemahan Helly Prajitno dan Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arends, R.I & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning “becoming an accomplished teacher”. Madision Avenue: Routladge.

Azwar, S. (2011). Sikap manusia: teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar offset.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22, tentang Standar Isi.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang standar proses.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang standar kompetensi kelulusan.

Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 19 tentang standar nasional pendidikan.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.

Elliott, S.N., et al. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effec-tive learning. (3rd ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Gable, R.K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publising.

Hadi, S. (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Jacobsen, D.A, Kauchak D., & Eggen P. (2009). Methods for teaching, metode-metode pengajaran meningkatkan belajar siswa TK-SMA. (Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid & Khoirul Anam). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Leder, G. (1992). Attitudes to mathematics. Mathematics education research journal, A (3), 34-56.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2008). Efective teaching toeri dan aplikasi. (Terjemahan Helly Prajitno dan Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Niss, M. (2002). Mathematical Competencies and the Learning of Mathematics: The Danish Kom Project. Diakses tanggal 10 April 2013 dari http://www7.nationalacademies.org/mseb/Mathematical_Competencies_and_the_Learning_of_Mathematics.pdf

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assesment of students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Noer, S.R. (2009). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jakarta: PT Rineka cipta.

Slavin, R.E. (2006). Education psychology “Theory and practice”Eighth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education International.

Shumway, R.J. (1980). Research in mathematics education. Virginia: The National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

Sudijono, A. (2008). Pengantar statistika pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soedjadi. (2000). Kiat pendidikan matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grasindo Persada.

Van de Walle, J. A. (2008). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah. (Terjemahan Suyono). Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Zakaria E., Chin, LC., & Daud, Md.Y. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning on students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Selangor: Journal of Social Sciences 6 (2), 272-275.

Zan, R., & Martino, P.D. (2002). Attitude Toword Mathematics: Overcoming The Positive/Negative Dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiats, 3,157-168.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i2.8930

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:


Creative Commons License Pythagoras is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras.

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 1978-4538 | e-ISSN: 2527-421X

Visitor Number:

View Pythagoras Stats