Developing Assessment As Learning on Basic Physics Virtual Practicum As An Asessment Instrument of Process And Cognitive Skills on Online-Learning

Eko Widodo, (Scopus ID: 57209774758) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Didik Setyawarno,
Dadan Rosana,

Abstract


This research aimed to i) create and analyze an assessment as learning on basic physics virtual practicum to measure the process and cognitive skills on online-learning, ii) analyze the implementation of the assessment as learning on basic physics virtual practicum to measure the process and cognitive skills on online-learning, and iii) analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of assessment as learning on basic physics virtual practicum to measure the process and cognitive skills on online-learning. This research used Research and Development (R and D) model with 4-D stages consisted of define, design, develop, and disseminate. The result of the research was a product of an assessment as learning, consisting of peer and self-assessment on virtual practicum of basic physic II on online learning. The product was valid based on an analysis of the Aiken formula and empirical study of the Rasch model. The result of the independent t-test sample towards the implementation of the product of assessment as learning, both peer and self-assessment was 0.160, which was higher than 0.5. The result showed that no significant differences occurred in the implementation of assessment as learning, both peer and self-assessment on the practicum of basic physics.


Keywords


assessment as learning, virtual practicum, online-learning, process skill, cognitive

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrizon, R., Ratnawulan, & Fauzi, A. (2012). Peningkatan Perilaku Berkarakter Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas Ix Mtsn Model Padang Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa-Fisika Menggunakan Model Problem Based Instruction. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 1, 1– 16.

Anderson, Lorin W & Krathwohl. 2001. A taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing a Revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objetives. USA, New York: Longman.

Abungu, Okere & Wachanga. 2014. Journal of Educational and Social Research : The Effect of Science Process Skills Teaching Approach on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Chemistry in Nyando District, Kenya. Kenya : Management Egerton University.

Ajeng Suryani, Parsaoran Siahaan, dan Achmad Samsudin. (2015). Proseding Seminar Nasional : Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa PERGURUAN TINGGI pada Materi Gerak. Bandung : UPI.

Ary Donald, Jacobs, Lucy Cheser, & Razavieh, Asghar. (1982). Introduction to Researt in Education (terjemahan).Surabaya : Usana Offset Printing.

Bybee R, Mccrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An Assessment of Scientific Literacy. Journa; of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 866-867.

Bolat, Yeliz & Karakus, Memet. 2017. Design Implementation and Authentic Assessment of a Unit According to Concept-Based Interdisciplinary Approach. International Electronic Journal of Elemtary Education Volume 10, Issue 1.

Candra Sayekti, I., Sarwanto, & Suparmi. (2012). Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing Melalui Metode Eksperimen Dan Demonstrasi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan AAnalisis dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Inkuiri, 1(2), 142–153.

Chiappetta, Eugene L & Koballa, Thomas R. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. New York : Allyn & Bacon.

Dadan Rosana. 2015. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sains. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Diani, R. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter dengan Model Problem Based Instruction. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v 4i2.96

Fensham, P. J. 2018. Science Education Policy-Making: Eleven Emerging Issues. Paris: UNESCO, Section for Science,Technical and Vocational Education. Diakses dari unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700e.pdf.

Holbrook, J. dan Rannikmae, M. 2007. “The nature of science Education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.

Houtz, B. (2010). Teaching science today. Corinne Burton.

Human Development Report. 2015. Briefing note for countries on the 2015 Human Development Report for Indonesia. Diakses pada tanggal 3 Maret 2016 di http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/IDN.pdf.

Komikesari, H. (2016). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(1), 15–22.

Kurniawan, D. T. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Website Interaktif pada Konsep Fluida Statis untuk Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 01 (1) (2018) 49-54

Murniasih, L., Subagia, I. W., Sudria, I. B. N., Pascasarjana, P., & Ganesha, U. P. (2013). Pengelolaan pembelajaran ipa : studi kasus pada perguruan tinggi di daerah terdepan , terluar , dan tertinggal. Program Studi Pendidikan IPA , Program Pascasarjana.

Osborne, J. 2007. “Science education for twenty first century”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(3), 173-184.

Paidi. (2011). Diktat perkuliahan metodologi penelitian pendidikan biologi. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.

Raina Vovianti, N. (2011). Kontribusi Pengelolaan Laboratorium dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Terhadap Efektivitas Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Edisi Khus(1), 158– 166.

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya. Parama Publishing.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir. Parama Publishing.

Rezba, R. J. (2002). Learning and Assesing Science Process Skill. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Rosana, D. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran sains (1st ed., Vol. 1). UNY Press.

Rosana, D., & Setyawarno, D. (2016). Statistik terapan untuk penelitian pendidikan. UNY Press.

Rusman. (2013). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sahlan, M & Rusilowati. 2012. Literasi Sains Sebagai Kerangka Asesmen Pembelajaran Sains Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IPA IV UNESA Surabaya

Setyawarno, D. (2020). Analisis skor. FMIPA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein A. 2006. Chemical literacy: what it means to scientists and school teachers?. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1557-1561.

Sheeba, M. N. (2013). An Anatomy of Science Process Skills In The Light Of The Challenges to Realize Science Instruction Leading To Global Excellence in Education. Educationia Confab.

Subana, Moersetyo Rahadi, Sudrajat. (2000). Statistik pendidikan. Bandung : Pustaka Setia. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan; pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Titik Harsiati, 2018, Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca pada program PISA. Jurnal LITERA Volume 17 nomor 1, Maret 2018.

Yagger, R.E., (1996). Science/Technology/Society as Reform inScience Education. USA: State University of New York Press, Albany

Zulaeha, Darmadi, I. W., & Werdhiana. (n.d.). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Predict , Observe and Explain terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Balaesang. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 1–8.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v6i1.48321

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jser/index

Accepted and published papers will be freely accessed in this website and the following abstracting & indexing databases:


   

=============================================================================================================

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.