Exploring Preservice Science Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Wave–Particle Duality through Prompt-Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v12i1.96211Keywords:
Prompt-based learning, wave–particle duality, preservice science teachers, Conceptual Understanding, quantum physics educationAbstract
This study aims to explore preservice science teachers’ conceptual understanding of wave–particle duality and to examine the role of prompt-based learning in supporting conceptual change. A qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design was employed involving 32 preservice science teachers enrolled in a physics education course. Data were collected through pre- and post-instruction open-ended conceptual tasks and written responses to structured prompts during instruction. Quantitative analysis was used to identify trends in conceptual understanding, while qualitative thematic analysis examined the nature and development of participants’ explanations. The results indicate that prior to instruction, most participants demonstrated classical or hybrid reasoning regarding wave–particle duality. After engaging in prompt-based learning, there was a significant increase in quantum-consistent conceptual understanding, accompanied by a shift from ontological to epistemic, model-based reasoning. The findings also reveal that explanation, reflective, and prediction–evaluation prompts played a key role in fostering conceptual coherence and metacognitive awareness, although some hybrid reasoning persisted. These results highlight the potential of prompt-based learning as an effective instructional approach for supporting preservice science teachers’ understanding of abstract quantum concepts.
References
Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 931–971. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617760
Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2019). Refined characterization of student perspectives on quantum physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPER.15.010118
Chi, M. T. H. (2015). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.1003100
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Didis, N. (2015). Preservice physics teachers’ mental models of quantum concepts. Science Education, 99(3), 555–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151
D’Mello, S. K., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2018). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 53, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.003
Handayani, R., & Widodo, A. (2020). Metacognitive scaffolding in science learning. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30211
Hsieh, J. S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Prompting strategies in science teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103042
Kang, H., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Thompson, J. (2021). Designing learning opportunities for scientific sensemaking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21635
Kind, V. (2019). Development of preservice teachers’ subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1547370
Kind, V., & Chan, K. K. H. (2019). Resolving the amalgam: Connecting pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 103(5), 1105–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21513
Kohnle, A., & Passante, G. (2017). Investigating student understanding of quantum mechanics. European Journal of Physics, 38(2), 025701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa57d0
Kohnle, A., Baily, C., Campbell, A., Korolkova, N., & Paetkau, M. (2018). A new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum. European Journal of Physics, 39(1), 015703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa958c
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPER.13.010109
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., van Joolingen, W. R., & Pol, H. J. (2019). Supporting conceptual understanding in quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1528628
Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2016). Plausibility judgments in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2017). Why we should teach the Bohr model. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPER.13.010103
McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2020). Developing and validating assessments of quantum understanding. American Journal of Physics, 88(5), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0000854
Nurhayati, S., Widodo, A., & Riandi, R. (2022). Inquiry-based learning and conceptual change in science education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34321
Putri, N. A., & Kuswanto, H. (2021). Conceptual understanding in quantum physics topics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.29245
Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating evidence and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1688259
Sinatra, G. M., Nadelson, L. S., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Science learning and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1709252
Singh, C., & Marshman, E. (2015). Review of student difficulties in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPER.11.020117
Utami, S., Widodo, A., & Riandi, R. (2023). Preservice teachers’ conceptual difficulties in quantum physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 19(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v19i1.40123
Vosniadou, S. (2019). Conceptual change research: A review. Learning and Instruction, 64, 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101246
Widyasari, A., & Haryanto. (2022). Analysis of students’ initial scientific literacy of science in elementary school teacher education student. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.41667
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2018). Educational innovations in physics. Physics Today, 71(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3801
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Modeling-based teaching. Science Education, 102(5), 1031–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21459
Yuliana, I., & Suyanto, E. (2020). Analysis of conceptual understanding in quantum physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.23456
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA (JIPI). However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
