Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA offers an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address different topics of science education with implications for improving and enhancing science education practices and theories. The topics involves biology, chemistry, physics, as well as some applications pedagogy and teacher development. The journal provides an invigorating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding. It also provides practice and policy based implications, as well as theoritical and methodological paradigm in the relevant contexts of science education either for high school and higher education. 
Published biannualy, the journal employs a rigorous peer review process. We do not accept manuscripts which are not easily understandable in English or do not address our major focus.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Biology Education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Chemistry Education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Physics Education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Science Education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least single reviewer. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. Language used in this journal is English or Indonesia.

 

Publication Frequency

The journal is published twice a year, April and October

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Yogyakarta State University). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed of Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Yogyakarta State University as publisher of Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Graduate School Program of Yogyakarta State University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA has a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software "Turnitin" to check the authenticity article

 

Citedness of Journal Articles in Scopus

Last update: December 3rd, 2021

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is cited by articles on SCOPUS database at least 184 times since published on April 2015.

Citation Detail:

No

Cited as

Cited

1

Cahyanto, M. A. S., Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). An analysis of gender difference on students’ misconceptions in learning the material classification and its changes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 157-167.

1

2

Supandi, M., & Senam, S. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan game ritual tumpe. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(2), 139-146.

1

3

Iriani, R., Herlina, A., Irhasyuarna, Y., & Sanjaya, R. E. (2019). Modul pembelajaran problem-based learning berbasis lahan basah untuk mempersiapkan calon pendidik berwawasan lingkungan lahan basah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(1), 54-68.

1

4

Aulia, L. N., Susilo, S., & Subali, B. (2019). Upaya peningkatan kemandirian belajar siswa dengan model problem-based learning berbantuan media Edmodo. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(1), 69-78.

1

5

Annisak, S. K., Indriyanti, N. Y., & Mulyani, B. (2019). Constructive controversy dan inkuiri terbimbing sesuai representasi tetrahedral pembelajaran kimia ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(1), 10-22.

1

6

Nugroho, R. A., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2018). Pengaruh servant leadership learning dengan concept mapping terhadap pemahaman konsep dan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 114-127.

1

7

Fitriyah, F., Sumpono, I., & Subali, B. (2018). Desain alat praktikum pembiasan cahaya untuk membantu meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 169-180.

1

8

Fujiyanti, M., Susilowati, E., & Saputro, S. (2018). Studi komparasi learning cycle 5E dan learning together dikombinasi dengan drill and practice terhadap prestasi belajar kimia ditinjau dari keterampilan proses siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 104-113.

1

9

Firdaus, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Pengembangan LKPD inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 26-40.

1

10

Elvanisi, A., Hidayat, S., & Fadillah, E. N. (2018). Analisis keterampilan proses sains siswa sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 245-252.

1

11

Utaminingsih, R., Rahayu, A., & Andini, D. W. (2018). Pengembangan RPP IPA sekolah dasar berbasis problem-based learning untuk siswa learning disabilities. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 191-202.

1

12

Maryani, I., & Amalia, L. (2018). The development of science comic to improve student’s understanding in elementary school. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 75-82.

1

13

Firdaus, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Pengembangan LKPD inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 26-40.

1

14

Putri, R. F., & Jumadi, J. (2017). Kemampuan guru fisika dalam menerapkan model-model pembelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 serta kendala-kendala yang dihadapi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 201-211.

1

15

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 252-261.

1

16

Astatin, G. R., & Nurcahyo, H. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran biologi berbasis adobe flash untuk meningkatkan penguasaan kompetensi pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 165-176.

1

17

Muskitta, M., & Djukri, D. (2016). Pengaruh model PBT terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMAN 2 Magelang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 58-65.

1

18

Mu'arif, H. A., & Surjono, H. D. (2016). Pengembangan e-learning berbasis pendekatan ilmiah pada mata pelajaran IPA di SMP Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan3(2), 195-206.

1

19

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 202-212.

1

20

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 202-212.

1

21

Wibowo, A., & Laksono, E. W. (2015). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Inkuiri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 102-114.

1

22

Lubis, I. R., & Ikhsan, J. (2015). Pengembangan media pembelajaran kimia berbasis android untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan prestasi kognitif peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 191-201.

1

23

Erina, R., & Kuswanto, H. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran instad terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar kognitif fisika di SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 202-211.

2

24

Setiawati, I. K., & Senam, S. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran ipa berbasis sets untuk meningkatkan scientific literacy dan foundational knowledge. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 178-190.

1

25

Pamungkas, A., Subali, B., & Linuwih, S. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran IPA berbasis kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 118-127.

1

26

Diani, R., & Hartati, N. S. (2018). Flipbook berbasis literasi Islam: Pengembangan media pembelajaran fisika dengan 3D pageflip professional. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 234-244.

1

27

Aulia, L. N., Susilo, S., & Subali, B. (2019). Upaya peningkatan kemandirian belajar siswa dengan model problem-based learning berbantuan media Edmodo. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(1), 69-78.

1

28

Urwani, A. N., Ramli, M., & Ariyanto, J. (2018). Analisis keterampilan komunikasi pada pembelajaran biologi sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 181-190.

1

29

Ningrum, M.N., Dewi, N.R., Parmin, P (2018). Pengembangan modul pop-up berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada tema tata surya untuk kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 1-10.

2

30

Nurhidayatulah, N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Miskonsepsi materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(1), 41-51.

2

31

Nugroho, A. A. (2017). The implementation of collaborative-based guided discovery reviewed from students’ analytical thinking skills and social skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 128-136.

2

32

Santofani, A., & Rosana, D. (2016). Pengembangan tes kreativitas pada pembelajaran fisika dengan pendekatan inkuiri pada materi teori kinetik gas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 134-144.

2

33

Kusumaningrum, S., & Djukri, D. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran model project based learning (PjBL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dan kreativitas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 241-251.

2

34

Syaban, M. F., & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Pengembangan SSP zat dan energi berbasis keunggulan lokal untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dan kepedulian lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 66-75.

2

35

Ni'mah, F. (2019). Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia: Where are we?. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA5(1), 23-30.

3

36

Nawawi, S., & Wijayanti, T. F. (2018). Pengembangan asesmen biologi berbasis keterampilan berpikir kritis terintegrasi nilai Islam. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 136-148.

3

37

Taqiyyah, S. A., Subali, B., & Handayani, L. (2017). Implementasi bahan ajar sains berbahasa inggris berbasis metakognitif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 224-234.

3

38

Ramadani, M., Supahar, S., & Rosana, D. (2017). Validity of evaluation instrument on the implementation of performance assessment to measure science process skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 180-188.

3

39

Dewi, N. D. L., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian IPA untuk memetakan critical thinking dan practical skill peserta didik SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 213-222.

3

40

Perkasa, M., & Aznam, N. (2016). Pengembangan SSP kimia berbasis pendidikan berkelanjutan untuk meningkatkan literasi kimia dan kesadaran terhadap lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 46-57.

3

41

Rostikawati, D. A., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Rekonstruksi bahan ajar dengan konteks socio-scientific issues pada materi zat aditif makanan untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 156-164.

3

42

Yarid, H., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika problem based learning melalui kegiatan fieldtrip pada materi energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 24-34.

3

43

Sugiarto, A., & Djukri, D. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis SETS sebagai upaya meningkatkan kreativitas dalam pemecahan masalah pencemaran lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(1), 1-11.

3

44

Uswatun, D. A., & Rohaeti, E. (2015). Perangkat pembelajaran IPA berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan critical thinking skills dan scientific attitude siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 138-152.

3

45

Iskandar, D., & Senam, S. (2015). Studi kemampuan guru kimia sma lulusan UNY dalam mengembangkan soal UAS berbasis HOTS. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(1), 65-72.

3

46

Diani, R., & Hartati, N. S. (2018). Flipbook berbasis literasi Islam: Pengembangan media pembelajaran fisika dengan 3D pageflip professional. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA4(2), 234-244.

4

47

Ulva, S. M. (2017). Developing PBL kit by utilizing blog in order to improve scientific process and problem solving skills in physics learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(1), 89-100.

4

48

Nawawi, S. (2017). Developing of module challenge based learning in environmental material to empower the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 212-223.

4

49

Muskitta, M., & Djukri, D. (2016). Pengaruh model PBT terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMAN 2 Magelang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 58-65.

4

50

Syarifah, S., & Sumardi, Y. (2015). Pengembangan model pembelajaran malcolm’s modeling untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 237-247.

4

51

Sukmasari, V. P., & Rosana, D. (2017). Pengembangan penilaian proyek pembelajaran IPA berbasis discovery learning untuk mengukur keterampilan pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(1), 101-110.

5

52

Sadiqin, I. K., Santoso, U. T., & Sholahuddin, A. (2017). Pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran problem solving pada topik perubahan benda-benda di sekitar kita. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(1), 52-62.

6

53

Widyawati, A., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2015). Pengembangan media komik IPA untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan karakter peserta didik SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(1), 24-35.

6

54

Hartini, H., & Sukardjo, S. (2015). Pengembangan higher order thinking multiple choice test untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir kritis ipa kelas VII SMP/MTs. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(1), 86-101.

7

55

Lubis, I. R., & Ikhsan, J. (2015). Pengembangan media pembelajaran kimia berbasis android untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan prestasi kognitif peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 191-201.

7

56

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 252-261.

8

57

Erina, R., & Kuswanto, H. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran instad terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar kognitif fisika di SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 202-211.

8

58

Sari, D. S., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2015). Pengembangan multimedia berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA1(2), 153-166.

9

59

Pamungkas, A., Subali, B., & Linuwih, S. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran IPA berbasis kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA3(2), 118-127.

10

60

Lestari, D. I., & Projosantoso, A. K. (2016). Pengembangan media komik IPA model PBL untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir analitis dan sikap ilmiah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(2), 145-155.

11

61

Yektyastuti, R., & Ikhsan, J. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis android pada materi kelarutan untuk meningkatkan performa akademik siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA2(1), 88-99.

13

Source: scopus.com

 

Withdrawal of Manuscripts

Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, and works invested by the publisher.

If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying Rp500.000,- per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.

The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying Rp1.000.000,- per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.