Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA offers an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address different topics of science education with implications for improving and enhancing science education practices and theories. The topics involves biology, chemistry, physics, as well as some applications pedagogy and teacher development. The journal provides an invigorating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding. It also provides practice and policy based implications in the relevant contexts of science education.
Published biannualy, the journal employs a rigorous peer review process. We do not accept manuscripts which are not easily understandable in English or do not address our major focus.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least single reviewer. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. Language used in this journal is English or Indonesia.

 

Publication Frequency

The journal is published twice a year, April and October

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Yogyakarta State University). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed of Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Yogyakarta State University as publisher of Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Graduate School Program of Yogyakarta State University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA has a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software "Turnitin" to check the authenticity article

 

Citedness of Journal Articles in Scopus

Last update: 21 February 2018

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA is cited by articles on SCOPUS database at least 13 times since published on April 2015.

Citation Detail:

Muskitta, M., & Djukri, D. (2016). Pengaruh model PBT terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMAN 2 Magelang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 58-65. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8809

Cited by:

  1. Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with local potential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Dewi, N., & Prasetyo, Z. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian IPA untuk memetakan critical thinking dan practical skill peserta didik SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 213-222. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.11963

Cited by: 

  1. Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with local potential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Hartini, H., & Sukardjo, S. (2015). Pengembangan higher order thinking multiple choice test untukmengukurketerampilanberpikirkritisipakelasVII SMP/MTs. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 86-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4535

Cited by:

  1. Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with localpotential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Syarifah, S., & Sumardi, Y. (2015). Pengembangan model pembelajaran malcolm’s modeling untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 237 - 247. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7510

Cited by:

  1. Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with localpotential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Uswatun, D., & Rohaeti, E. (2015). Perangkat pembelajaran IPA berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan critical thinking skills dan scientific attitude siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 138 - 152. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7498

Cited by:

  1. Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with localpotential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Lubis, I., & Ikhsan, J. (2015). Pengembangan media pembelajaran kimia berbasis android untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan prestasi kognitif peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 191 - 201. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7504

Cited by:

  1. Puspita, I., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2017).Collaborationof chemistry instructional games and group investigation (Gi) model to improve learning outcome in high school students (p. 50004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983906

Erina, R., & Kuswanto, H. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran instad terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar kognitif fisika di SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 202 - 211. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7507

Cited by: 

  1. Sulistijo, S. H., Sukarmin, S., & Sunarno, W. (2017). Physics learning using inquiry-student team achievement division (ISTAD) and guided inquiry models viewed by students achievement motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9601

  2. Dwianto, A., Wilujeng, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). The development of science domain based learning media which is integrated with local potention to improve science process skill and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7205

  3. Setiawan, D., & Wilujeng, I. (2016). The development of scientific-approach-based learning instruments integrated with red onion farming potency in Brebes Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V5I1.5785

  4. Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 252-261. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.6278
 
Cited by:
  1. Sulistijo, S. H., Sukarmin, S., & Sunarno, W. (2017). Physics learning using inquiry-student team achievement division (ISTAD) and guided inquiry models viewed by students achievement motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9601

Rostikawati, D., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Rekonstruksi bahan ajar dengan konteks socio-scientific issues pada materi zat aditif makanan untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 156-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8814
 
Cited by:
  1. Rubini, B., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2018). Building character through science learning with scientific literacy based. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 12030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012030

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). Efektivitas virtual lab berbasis STEM dalam meningkatkan literasi sains siswa dengan perbedaan gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 190-201. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8570
 
Cited by:
  1. Rubini, B., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2018). Building character through science learning with scientific literacy based. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 12030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012030

Source: scopus.com