Effect of personalized instructional strategy on student achievement in mathematics
Downloads
The study examined how math students' academic performance was affected by the individualized learning strategy. The quasi-experimental non-randomized pretest, posttest, and control group design was used in this investigation. The population included every SS 2 student enrolled in Ogun's Central Senatorial District in Ogun State, Nigeria. From four local government areas in the Ogun-east senatorial district, two treatment classes (with 62 students) and two control classes (with 68 students) were chosen at random. Samples were drawn using a basic random sampling technique. Using a pre-test-post-test quasi-experimental research design, the study was guided by two research questions and two null research hypotheses. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated using the Guttmann split-half, which has a coefficient of 0.86. At the 0.05 level of significance, the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (independent sample t-test). The results demonstrated a significant difference in the mean accomplishment scores between senior secondary school pupils taught utilizing the lecture method approach and those exposed to the personalized learning strategy. Additionally, the findings demonstrated that when mathematics was taught using the virtual learning approach, there was no appreciable difference in the performance of male and female students. Therefore, the results offer fresh perspectives on how tailored learning approaches might close achievement gaps and guide changes to educational policies.
Abdullahi, A. C., Jibrin, A. G., Dauda, M. O. & Danjuma I. M. (2021). Effect of 7es learning strategy on retention secondary school students in Biology in Bauchi Metropolis, Bauchi State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Education, Humanities and Management Sciences 3(1), 125 – 136.
Abiodun, T. O. (2024). Effects of problem-based learning strategy on secondary school mathematics students’ academic achievement in Ogun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Science Technology and Mathematics Education. 10(2), 246-251. https://www.ajstme.com.ng
Abiodun, T.O. & Asanre, A.A. (2025). Effects of computer assisted instruction (CAI) on senior secondary school students’ learning outcome in mathematics. African Journal of Science Technology and Mathematics Education. 11(1) 171-177. https://www.ajstme.com.ng
Abiodun, T.O., Asanre, A.A. & Chinaka, T.W. (2025). Impact of the elicit, engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate and extend (7E) learning model on Senior Secondary school students’ mathematics achievement. ASEAN Jornal of Science and Engineering Education. 5(2), 117-126. http://ejournal.upi/index.php/AJSEE/
Abiodun, T.O., Asanre, A.A., Ogundeji, M.A., Odupe, T.A & Rasaki, M.G (2022): Influence of teachers’ characteristics on students’ achievement in mathematics in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Science, Technology and Education (JSTE); www.nsukjste.com/6(3), 16-22.
Akın, A. (2022). The effectiveness of web-based mathematics instruction on K–16 students' mathematics learning: A meta-analytic research. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8015–8040. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-10931-x
Akinsola, M. K. & Awofala, A. O. A. (2009). Effect of personalization of instruction on pupils’ achievement and self-efficacy in numeracy word problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(3), 389-404. Doi: 10.1080/00207390802643169
Asanre, A. A., & Abiodun T. O. (2025). Effect of laboratory teaching strategy on academic performance of primary school students in mathematics. Journal of Educational Sciences. 9(1),409-416. Doi: 10.31258/jes.9.1.p.409-418
Awofala, A. O.A. (2014). Examining personalisation of instruction, attitudes toward and achievement in numeracy word problems among Nigerian senior secondary school pupils. International Journal of Education in Numeracy, Science and Technology, 2(4), 273-288. Doi: 10.18404/ijemst.91464
Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L. & Adell, J. (2018). Personalisation in educational technology: the absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17. Doi: 10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
Bates, E. T., & Wiest, L. R. (2004). Impact of personalization of mathematical word problems on student performance. The Mathematics Educator, 14(2), 17-26. Doi: 10.63301/tme.v14i2.1876
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future oriented learning and teaching - a New Zealand perspective. New Zealand: Ministry of Education
Chien, Y. T., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17(1), 1–18. Doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.10.003
Fabregat Gesa, R., Gómez Ardila, S. E., Zervas, P., & Sampson, D. G. (2014). Context-aware adaptive and personalized mobile learning delivery supported by UoLmP. Journal of King Saud University, 26(1), 47–61. Doi: 10. 1016j.ksuci.2013.10.008
Falcão, T. P., Peres, de Morais, F. M. D. A., D. C. S., & da Silva Oliveira, G. (2017). Participatory methodologies to promote student engagement in the development of educational digital games. Computers & Education, 116, 161–175. Doi: 10.1016/jcompedu.2017-09.006
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013). National policy on education: Roadmap for Nigerian educational sector. Published by NERDC, Yaba, Lagos.
Groff, J. S. (2017). Personalized learning: The state of the field & future directions. Center for Curriculum Redesign, 47(1), 1–44.
Halverson, R. (2019). Taking a learning sciences perspective to understand personalized learning in schools. In Presentation at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94(1), 102–119. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013
Hyde, J. S. (2016). Sex and cognition: Gender and cognitive functions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 38(1), 53-56. Doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.007
James, O. C., Uchenna, O. T., & Anthony, A. (2025). Effect of personalized learning strategy on senior secondary school students' achievement in mathematics. Education Journal, 14(5), 240–256. DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20251405.14
Kollosche, D., Steflitsch, D. & Daweis-weidlinger, K. M. (2024). Gender, mathematics and mathematics education. In book: Breaking images, 2024, pp 575-594. Doi: 10.11647/obp.0407.19
Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology-supported personalised learning in low‐and middle‐income countries: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935–1964. Doi: 10.1111/bjet.13116
McLeskey, J. L., Rosenberg, M. S., & Westling, D. L. (2017). Inclusion: Effective practices for all students. Pearson
Nandigam, D., Tirumala, S. S. & Baghaei, N. (2014). Personalized learning: Current status and potential. In: 2014 IEEE conference on e-learning, e-management and e-services (IC3e). IEEE; 2014. pp. 111–6. Doi: 10.1109/ic3e.2014.7081251
Nitkin, D., Ready, D. D., & Bowers, A. J. (2022). Using technology to personalize middle school math instruction: Evidence from a blended learning program in five public schools. Frontiers in Education, 7(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.646471
Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. (2012). Levels of students’ conception of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 61–83. Doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9338-x
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896–915. doi:10.1037/a0019545
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2016). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. Doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Romiro, G. B. (2021). The effects of personalized instruction on the academic achievement of pupils in Physics. International Journal of Art and Sciences. AMA International University – Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain. pp, 1-9
Setambah, M. A. B., Appalanaidu, S. R., Zaini, S. H., et al. (2025). Differentiated instruction: A systematic literature review on implementation guidelines in mathematics education. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences,12(3), 101-108. DOI: 10.21833/ijaas.2025.03.011
Setambah, M. A. B., Saad, M. I. M., Ghazali, N. H. C. M., & Adnan, M. (2024). A comprehensive synthesis of differentiated instruction approaches in mathematics. LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 3-12. DOI: 10.31129/LUMAT.12.4.2371
Shemshack, A. & Spector, J. M. (2021). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environment, 7(1):1–20. https://.doi/org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
Shemshack, A., Kinshuk & Spector, J. M. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of personalized learning components. Journal of Computer in Education, 8(4):485–503.
Simpson, J. C. (2020). Successes and challenges of technology-enhanced personalized learning. EDU LEARN20 Proceedings, 8505–8509. Doi: 10.2115/edulearn.2020.2091
Tadlaoui, M. A. & Khaldi, M. (2020). Concepts and interactions of personalization, collaboration, and adaptation in digital learning. In book: Personalization and collaboration in adaptive E-learning. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2020. pp. 1–33. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1492-4.ch001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind the society: The development of higher psychological process. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235–252. Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757
Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2022). Integrating instructional designs of personalized learning through the lens of universal design for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1639-1656. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12725
Copyright (c) 2026 Taiwo Abiodun, Akorede Asanre, Abimbola, Lawrence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.


