Uncovering Learning Obstacles in Elementary Students Fraction Understanding: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis for Didactical Design
Abstract
Learning fractions in elementary school remains difficult for students because the concept is abstract and requires strong conceptual understanding. Although prior studies have examined epistemological, didactical, or ontogenic learning obstacles separately, few have triangulated multiple data sources to capture how these three dimensions interact, particularly within a Didactical Design Research (DDR) framework at the lower-grade elementary level, this gap in integrated, multi-source analysis is what the present study addresses. This study identifies and analyzes the three types of learning obstacle experienced by third-grade students in learning fractions at UPT SDN 060817 Medan and examines how these obstacles interact as a basis for designing DDR-based instruction. A qualitative descriptive approach was used with 15 third-grade students and one classroom teacher as subjects. Data was collected through a mathematical concept-understanding test, classroom observation, semi-structured interviews, and instructional-artifact analysis, then triangulated. Results show that only 33.33% of students reached mastery, with a class average of 53.2. Fifteen learning obstacles were identified: five epistemological, five didactical, and five ontogenic, and these interact with one another rather than occurring independently. Identifying these three obstacle categories carries direct practical significance for guiding teachers in designing more contextual, concrete-media- and technology-supported fraction instruction. The findings provide an empirical foundation for a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) integrating concrete media, PhET Simulation, Problem-Based Learning, and local Medan contextualization.
References
Afridayanti, D., Rakhmawati, Y., & Afridayanti, D. (2022). Improving the Understanding of Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Through Cooperative Model of Rotating Trio Exchange ( RTE ) Type for Students Elementary School. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 2(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v2i2.33
Aini, I. Q., Alim, R. F., & Firmansyah, Y. (2025). Implementation of Jean Piaget’s cognitive Development theory in Science Learning in Elementary Schools and its Relevance to SDGs 4. Journal on Smart Learning Technologies., 1(2).
Alzanatul Umam M., Zulkarnaen, R. (2022). Kemampuan Konsep Matematis. Penerbit UNMA.
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Arsyad, A., Rahman, M., & Putri, D. (2024). The Efficiency of Using Visual Learning Media in Improving The Understanding of Science Concepts in Elementary School Students. Journal of Science Education, 12(45–58).
Atiaturrahmaniah, Kudsiah, M., & Ulfa, E. M. (2021). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Materi Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV SDN Sukaraja. Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.29408/didika.v7i2.4657
Brousseau. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Dasilvawati, P. (2022). Desain Didaktis Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Berbasis Teori Van Hiele Dengan Media Geogebra. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Faustyna. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Komunikasi (Teori dan Praktek). umsu press.
Fitriana, A., & Maarif, S. (2022). Analysis of Learning Obstacle to Numeracy Ability Based on Mathematical Resilience of Elementary Students. (Jiml) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i2.11202
Hariyani, M., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Mengembangkan Desain Didaktis Berdasarkan Hambatan Belajar dan Learning Trajectory Siswa pada Konsep Dasar Pecahan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 6(2), 416–425.
Ina V.S , Mulis , Michael. O, Martin , Pierre Foy, Dana .L, Kelly, B. F. (2019). Lynch School of Education and Human Development Boston College. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Kemdikbudristek. (2023). PISA 2022 dan Pemulihan Pembelajaran Di Indonesia. Laporan PISA Kemdikbudristek. https://lpmpdki.kemdikbud.go.id/pisa-2022-dan pemulihan-pembelajaran-di-Indonesia
Munir. (2023). Kajian Pedagogik Pendidikan Ilmu Komputer. Penerbit Indonesia Emas Group.
Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. D. (2025). Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
Nurfajriani, W. V., Ilhami, M. W., Mahendra, A., Afgani, M. W., & Sirodj, R. A. (2024). Triangulasi Data dalam Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(17), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13929272
Oviyanti, F., Maryamah, M., Sartika, A., Sanjaya, C. R., & Supriyadi, S. (2024). Analysis of Student Learning Difficulties in Islamic Education Subject at Elementary School. EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology, 7(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v7i3.851
Perkins, K., McKagan, S., & Moore, E. (2024). Transforming Science Education in Elementary Schools: The Power of PhET Simulations in Enhancing Student Learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105
PISA. (2022). The State Of Learning And Equity In Education. OECD Publishing Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pitadjeng. (2021). Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Menyenangkan. Graha Ilmu.
Rakhmawati, Y., Retnawati, H., Sugiman, S., Kassymova, G. K., & Kudyarova, G. (2023). Exploring pre-service teacher’s knowledge of content and teaching (KCT) and computational thinking: The case of addition and subtraction. 151–159. https://doi.org/10.31643/2023.18
Rahayu, Y., Pujiastuti, H. (2023). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis. Penerbit UNPAS.
Rahman, S. M. R. (2025). From Concrete to Abstract: Piaget’s theory for Cognitive Development. BRAC University Research Journal., 1–15.
Ritawati, Bernadeta; Liliana, Sepriana; Tupulu, N. (2024). Materi Pecahan. PT Nasya Expanding Management.
Septiadi, R., Wahidah, N. (2022). Pemahaman Konsep. Penerbit UNPAS.
Setyaningrum, Ermawati, R. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Dalam Memahami Konsep Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri Sidomulyo. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v8i1.8270
Sidik, G. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2021). Learning Obstacle of Addition Operation Whole Number in Elementary Schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1), 12070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012070
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan Filosofis Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR). Gapura Press.
Van Hoof, J., Janssen, R., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2022). Incorrect Ways of Thinking About the Size of Fractions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1481–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10338-7
Wally dkk, N. (2024). Analisis Hambatan Belajar Matematika Bagi Siswa Sd Pada Materi Pecahan. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 190–195. https://doi.org/10.33387/jpgm.v4i3.8246
Yayuk, E. (2021). Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press.
Yunita, Y., & Irawan, T. A. (2025). Effectiveness of Interactive Media in Enhancing Students’ Science Concept Understanding. Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 8(4), 6687–6697.
Zhang, S., Yu, S., Xiao, J., Liu, Y., & Jiang, T. (2022). The Effects of Concrete-Representational-Abstract Sequence Instruction on Fractions for Chinese Elementary Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1481–1498). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10215-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 tiarasyahvira, abdulmujib, Jamiu Temitope Sulaimon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

