Developing assessment instruments of debate practice in Indonesian Language learning

Septiana Farida; Farida Agus Setiawati

doi:10.21831/reid.v7i2.43338

Developing assessment instruments of debate practice in Indonesian Language learning

Septiana Farida, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Farida Agus Setiawati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/reid.v7i2.43338

Abstract

This study aims to develop an instrument for assessing debate practice in Indonesian Class X senior high school (Sekolah Menengah Atas or SMA/Madrasah Aliyah or MA) learning. The theoretical construct of the instrument was found after reviewing several theories, including speaking skills that apply to debate practice, especially those based on the Australian Debating Federation. The non-test instrument development procedure used is the Mardapi model, which includes non-cognitive. Ten material experts reviewed the draft instrument (two lecturers and eight Indonesian Language Teachers Class X in the SMA/MA in Yogyakarta Special Region) then it was calculated using the Aiken formula to prove the validity of the contents of the instrument. The draft instrument was also tested by two raters/evaluators to assess the debate practice. The results of this trial were used to calculate inter-rater reliability using Cohen Kappa. The assessment instrument was declared reliable from the calculation of the inter-rater reliability value of the Kappa formula, which was obtained at 0.678. The final item number of the instrument after the exploratory factor analysis is 33 items with adjustments to the composition of the dimensions of the statement items.

Keywords

assessment; instrument; debate; practice; Indonesian language

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2018). Kisi-kisi USBN dan UN. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. https://bsnp-indonesia.org/2018/11/bsnp-rilis-kisi-kisi-usbn-dan-un-2019/

Brown, Z. W. (2015). The use of in-class debates as a teaching strategy in increasing students’ critical thinking and collaborative learning skills in higher education. Educationalfutures [Online], 7(1). https://educationstudies.org.uk/?p=3685

Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752453

D'Cruz, R. (2003). The Australia-Asia debating guide (2nd ed.). The Australian Debating Federation. https://www.dav.com.au/resources/aadg.php

Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309

Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression & structural equation models. Statistical Publishing Associates.

Ghorbani, S., Mirshah Jafari, S. E., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0002

Isnaniar. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan berbicara siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 4 Kota Bengkulu tahun ajaran 2012-2013 dengan pendekatan komunikatif [Universitas Bengkulu]. http://repository.unib.ac.id/id/eprint/8515

Latif, M. A. (n.d.). A comprehensive guide to debate adjudication. International Islamic University Malaysia. http://phased-uph.weebly.com/uploads/3/2/1/6/32162939/comprehensive_adjudication_guide.pdf

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama Publishing.

Midun, H. (2017). Membangun budaya mutu dan unggul di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 9(1), 50–59. http://unikastpaulus.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jpkm/article/view/117

Morelent, Y. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berbicara siswa melalui kegiatan bercerita berbasis karakter di Sekolah Menengah Atas: Studi kuasi eksperimen pada siswa kelas X SMA Banuhampu Kabupaten Agam [Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/7716/

Murti, B. (2011). Validitas dan reliabilitas pengukuran. In Matrikulasi Program Studi Doktoral, Fakultas Kedokteran, UNS, 1-19. https://dokumen.tips/documents/validitas-reliabilitas-pengukuran-prof-bhisma-murti-55cd8744673e9.html?page=19

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2001). Penilaian dalam pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. BPFE-UGM.

O’Connor, A., Carpenter, B., & Coughlan, B. (2018). An exploration of key issues in the debate between classic and constructivist grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 17(1). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2018/12/27/an-exploration-of-key-issues-in-the-debate-between-classic-and-constructivist-grounded-theory/

Poerwanti, E., Widodo, E., Masduki, Pantiwati, Y., Poerwanti, E., Widodo, E., Masduki, Pantiwati, Y., & Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Asesmen pembelajaran SD. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Quinn, S. (2005). Debating. Simon Quinn. https://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/quinn_DEBATING.pdf

Salim, A. (2015). Debate as a learning-teaching method: A survey of literature. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 2(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v2i1.1665

Sari, K. D. I., Wendra, I. W., & Wisudariani, N. M. R. (2016). Pelaksanaan evaluasi pembelajaran keterampilan berbicara (bercerita) dengan materi cerpen pada siswa kelas IX D SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 5(3). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBS/article/view/8688

Simarmata, M. Y., & Sulastri, S. (2018). Pengaruh keterampilan berbicara menggunakan metode debat dalam mata kuliah Berbicara Dialektik pada mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 7(1), 49-62. https://journal.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/bahasa/article/view/826

Viswesh, V., Yang, H., & Gupta, V. (2018). Evaluation of a modified debate exercise adapted to the pedagogy of team-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(4), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6278

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v7i2.43338