Feasibility of Structured Assignment Sheet to Train The Ability to Draft a Frame of Mind in Solving Chemical Problems in Reaction Rate Materials

Authors

  • N. R. Janah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • S. Suyono Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v6i2.49440

Keywords:

Structured Assignment Sheet, The Ability to Draft a Frame of Mind, Reaction Rate

Abstract

The study aimed to produce a feasible structured assignment sheet as a learning device. The structured assignment sheet was feasible to be used to train the ability to draft a frame of mind in solving chemical problems in reaction rate material. This developed learning device is named SAS-ADFM. The feasibility of SAS-ADFM included criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. SAS-ADFM was developed using the Research and Development (R and D) method. SAS-ADFM was tested on 15 students of class XI who had obtained reaction rate material at SMAN 3 Surabaya. The instruments were the sheets of validation, student response questionnaire, and frame of mind drafting ability test. The validity of SAS-ADFM based on the assessment of three validators met the criteria of validity with a value of Mo ≥ 4 and R ≥ 75%. Meanwhile, the practicality of SAS-ADFM based on the analysis of the assessment of the student response questionnaire produced a very practical category with a percentage of 99%. Finally, the effectiveness of SAS-ADFM based on the analysis of the assessment of the ability to draft a frame of mind produced an N-gain score of 0.5 with a medium category. Hence, the developed SAS-ADFM was feasible to be used as a learning device.

References

Afandi, Junanto, T., & Afriani, R. (2016). Implementasi Digital-Age Literacy dalam Pendidikan Abad 21 di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS), 113–120.

Andrian, Y., & Rusman. (2019). Implementasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1).

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Irvine, S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Cengage Learning.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

Borich, G. (1994). Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. In Mac Millan Publishing Company.

BSNP. (2014). Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Kimia untuk Peserta Didik SMA/MA. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional methods: A Six Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Helena, Y. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Menggunakan Metode Guided-Discovery pada Siswa Kelas X-4 Man 2 Padangsidimpuan Semester Ganjil Tahun 2017. Jurnal Paidagogeo, 2(5), 47–59.

Kundi, S. (2013). Pengaruh Penggunaan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa Terstruktur terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Pol-ut Kabupaten Takalar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(3).

Nieveen, N. (2010). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at Shanghai (PR China): The East China Normal University.

Otania, M., Abudarin, & Berkat Asi, N. (2019). Pengaruh Pemberian Latihan Soal Terstruktur Setelah Pembelajaran Langsung terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ikatan Kovalen pada Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 4 Palangka Raya Tahun. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 10(1), 95–103. https://chem-upr.education/ojs.

Pebriana, Kamid, & Hariyadi, B. (2019). Proses Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa Tipe Climber dalam Pemecahan Masalah Biologi di SMA. Edu-Sains, 8(2).

Permendikbud. (2016). Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2016. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Permendikbud. (2018). Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 UU Nomor 37 Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Riduwan. (2016). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rinaldi, S. F., & Mujianto, B. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian dan Statistik. Bahan Ajar Teknologi Laboratorium Medis (TLM). Kementrian Kesehatan Rebuplik Indonesia.

Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4C Abad 21 dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, VIII(02), 112–122.

Setiawan, D. (2017). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Penilaian Autentik Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Agama Islam. Al- ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 01(02).

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suriasumantri, J. (2009). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-23

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): J. Sc. Edu. Research

Section

Articles

License

Journal of Science Education Research allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  1. Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  2. Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal