Literary comprehension competence among senior high school students in Purwokerto

Memet Sudaryanto; Aldi Nur Fadilah

doi:10.21831/pep.v29i1.83343

Literary comprehension competence among senior high school students in Purwokerto

Memet Sudaryanto, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Aldi Nur Fadilah, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v29i1.83343

Abstract

Literature learning should be designed according to students' characteristics. However, there is still no available competency map that specifically measures students' understanding of literary competencies in schools. This study aims to measure and describe students' competencies in prose, poetry, and drama in Purwokerto. Quantitatively, this study employs a test method based on theoretical construction by developing 30 multiple-choice items that assess students' ability to understand intrinsic and extrinsic elements in prose, poetry, and drama. The study population comprised 5.187 10th-grade students in Purwokerto. A sample of 1.034 students was randomly selected from three public schools in Purwokerto using the PickerWheel application. Instrument validation was conducted using the Aiken Index, yielding a result above 0.75 with five experts. Ekspert merupakan guru dan dosen Bahasa Indonesia yang memenuhi kualifikasi dan kompetensi sebagai ahli di bidang sastra. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and the Test Information Function (TIF) to evaluate the items' ability to explain students' competencies. Through the Rasch Model, this study identified a range of item difficulty levels on a logit scale from -2.55 to 3.17, indicating that the difficulty level of the items falls within a normal range. Based on the analysis of student literature competencies at senior high schools in Purwokerto, the results indicate that the highest student ability score is 100, the lowest score is 0, with a median of 51.11, a standard deviation of 13.89, and the 75th percentile at 59.87.

Keywords

assessment; literature; poem; Purwokerto; Rasch

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Aji, W. N. (2016). Model pembelajaran Dick and Carrey dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra Indonesia. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 1(2), 119–126.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. In Longman New York.

Ansari, K. (2020). Arah pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra indonesia pada era revolusi industri 4.0. Pustaka Diksi.

Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272.

Blohm, S., Versace, S., Methner, S., Wagner, V., Schlesewsky, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2022). Reading poetry and prose: Eye movements and acoustic evidence. Discourse Processes, 59(3), 159–183.

Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hasting, J. T. (n.d.). Evaluation to Improve Learning. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Chaudhuri, S., Pickering, A., Dooley, M., & Bhattacharya, J. (2024). Beyond the words: Exploring individual differences in the evaluation of poetic creativity. Plos One, 19(10), e0307298.

Fayers, P. (2004). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qure.0000021503.45367.f2

Gasong, D. (2019). Apresiasi Sastra Indonesia.

Griffin, P. (1991). Literacy Assessment: Merging Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.

Hakim, H. R., & Utami, S. F. (2024). Analisis Struktural Cerpen “Assyarru Bis-Syarri” Karya Abdul Fattah Shobri & Ali Umar. Enggang: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 4(2), 172–182.

Hambleton, R. K., Hariharan, S., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. SAGE, 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075521

Hambleton, R., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637

Hermawan, D. (2019). Pemanfaatan hasil analisis novel seruni karya almas sufeeya sebagai bahan ajar sastra di sma. METAMORFOSIS| Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 11–20.

Ifianti, T., & Fitriani, E. (2022). Drama dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris: Tantangan Dan Harapan. ALFABETA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 10–18.

Kidwell, T. (2017). Understanding Culture: A Literature Review Comparing Three Cultural Pedagogies. Register Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v10i2.221-233

Lianawati, W. S. (2019). Menyelami keindahan sastra Indonesia. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Mansyur, U. (2016). Inovasi pembelajaran bahasa indonesia melalui pendekatan proses. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 9(2), 256786.

Marantika, J. E. R. (2014). Drama dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra. Tahuri, 11(2), 92–102.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. In Nuha Medika. Nuha Media.

Moussa, M. A., & Amer, A. N. E. S. (2024). The Academic Motivation Scale: Evaluation Evidence of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Faculty of Education Students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 11(4), 283–294.

Mustadi, A., Amelia, R., Budiarti, W. N., Anggraini, D., Amalia, E., & Susandi, A. (2021). Strategi pembelajaran keterampilan berbahasa dan bersastra yang efektif di Sekolah Dasar. UNY Press.

MW, der Linden, W. J. Van, & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2965612

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students. Human Movement Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.02.001

Oakleaf, M. (2009). Writing information literacy assessment plans: A guide to best practice. Communications in Information Literacy. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2010.3.2.73

Priyandani, Y., Suliani, N. N. W., & Mustofa, A. (2015). PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS TEKS CERITA PENDEK PADA KELAS VII SMPN 13 BANDAR LAMPUNG. Jurnal Kata: Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 3(4).

Purba, A. (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Sastra. USUpress.

Rachmah, S., & Huda, M. (2021). Realisasi Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan pada Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 11(3), 338–345.

Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item Response Theory and Clinical Measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553

Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated Learning Scale (The comparison of Aiken index and Expanded Gregory Index). REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029

Retnawati, H. (2017). Learning Trajectory of Item Response Theory Course using Multiple Softwares. Olympiads in Informatics 11, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2017.10

Sari, R. F., & Lubis, F. (2017). Kemampuan Menulis Naskah Drama Siswa Kelas VIII MTs Nurul Khairiyah Sei Tuan Tahun Pembelajaran 2016/2017. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 6(2), 195972.

Siswanto, W. (2008). Pengantar teori sastra. Grasindo.

Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2012). An introduction to student involved assessment for learning. Pearson Assessment Training Institute.

Sunaryo, H., Zuriah, N., & Kusniarti, T. (2017). Model adaptasi nilai kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran sastra berkarakter. SOSIOHUMANIKA, 10(1), 107–116.

Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch Campuran dalam Mengevaluasi Pengukuran Harga Diri. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/PEP.V17I1.1367

Woods, A., & Baker, R. (1985). Item response theory. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200202

Wuryani, W. (2013). Pesona karya sastra dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan budaya indonesia. Semantik, 2(2), 87–101.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v29i1.83343