Understanding and quality of minimum competency assessment (AKM) questions made by Integrated Science teachers in junior high schools
Fatkul Yudhistira Manik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Ratna Dwi Trisnawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Emiliana Emiliana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Sri Yuliawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Abstract
The main problem with implementing the minimum competency assessment (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum or AKM) is the teacher's lack of understanding of AKM. The assessment questions made by the teacher are still limited to testing memory. The level of variation and difficulty of the questions presented is also still low (LOTS), contrary to the government's expectation to improve the quality of learning outcomes which are oriented toward students' higher-order thinking stages (HOTS). This research employed a mixed method. An overview of the teacher's understanding was obtained through questionnaires and interviews, while the description of the quality of the AKM of Integrated Science items made by the teacher was analyzed using the item quality rubric based on Bloom's taxonomy. The data source was obtained from 25 Integrated Science teachers for class VIII of junior high school in Bekasi City. The data were collected through three stages. The first stage employed the Google Form survey to see the demographic map of informants and teachers' initial understanding of AKM. In the second stage, five informants were selected from the results of the survey, representing the data source's characteristics. Then, in the third stage, literature analysis was done to develop rubric criteria for assessing the quality of AKM items. This rubric was used by the research team to assess the quality of AKM items made by an Integrated Science teacher at a junior high school in Bekasi City. Questions that meet the criteria for good questions were collected and entered into the AKM question bank.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asosiasi Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. (2021). Webinar series 2021 “Penguatan Budaya Riset dan Asesmen Dalam Pendidikan.” Pemahaman Dan Kualitas Butir Soal AKM Buatan Guru SMP Di Kota Bekasi.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives’. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. McKay.
Dr. Sugiono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.
Driana, Ernawati. (2020). Exploring Assessments Of Higher-Order Thinking Skills Among Chemistry Teachers At Indonesian Vocational Senior Secondary Schools. Jurnal Edusains, 12(2).
Hendri dan Kumi. (2020). persiapkan asesmen kompetensi minimum akm menuju sekolah berkualitas. Http://Ditpsd.Kemdikbud.Go.Id. http://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel/detail/persiapkan-asesmen-kompetensi-minimum-akm-menuju-sekolah-berkualitas
Humairoh, Hakim, Pranowo. (2020). Problematika Ujian Nasional, Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum dan Survei Karakter Dalam Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar. Journal.Uny.Ac.Id.
Miles,M.B, Huberman,A.M, Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A. Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. Oecd, 1–10. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86
Pendidikan, M. (2019). Merdeka Belajar. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–21.
Setiadi, Ernawati. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis LOTS dan HOTS Buatan Guru Kelas VI. Journal.Uhamka.Ac.Id.
Vi, G. K., & Hartini, P. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis LOTS dan HOTS Buatan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i2.48670
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:
ISSN 2338-6061 (online) || ISSN 2685-7111 (print)
View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics