An evaluation of mathematics learning program at primary education using Countenance Stake Evaluation model

Bayuk Nusantara Karaeng Jannang Tompong; Jailani Jailani

doi:10.21831/pep.v23i2.16473

An evaluation of mathematics learning program at primary education using Countenance Stake Evaluation model

Bayuk Nusantara Karaeng Jannang Tompong, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jailani Jailani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v23i2.16473

Abstract

The quality of mathematics learning in Bantaeng Regency, South Sulawesi were in a low category based on the research findings from the Institute of Educational Quality Assurance of South Sulawesi in 2011. It affects students to be unwilling to be involved in the process of mathematics learning. This study aims to evaluate the process of learning mathematics in the elementary educational level at Bantaeng Regency. The model of evaluation used in this study is the Stake Countenance Model consisting of three steps of evaluation, namely antecedent, transaction, and outcomes. The subjects of this study were 12 teachers at state elementary schools in Bantaeng Regency assessed by three raters. There were 363 midterm score tests from 12 schools. The instruments used in this study were observation sheet, lesson plan sheet, assessment documentation sheet, and interview guideline. This study used a quantitative research approach supported by qualitative data. The result of the study shows that (1) the lesson plan of mathematics subject is in a good category (93.45%), (2) the learning process is in the good enough category (67.07%), (3) the document of students assessment is in the good enough category (71.34%), and (4) most students in each school do not pass the school standard.

Keywords

evaluation; mathematics learning; Countenance Stake model

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andriani, S. (2015). Evaluasi CSE-UCLA pada studi proses pembelajaran matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.46

Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas & validitas (IV). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2017). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bahri, H. A., & Alimuddin, A. (2016). The profile of teacher’s understanding on student’s mathematics ability based on teacher’s teaching experience at SMPN 1 Gantarangkeke. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 4(2), 119–128. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JDM/article/view/2892/pdf_31

Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889

Burton, D. T., & Kappenberg, J. W. (2013). Mathematics, the common core, and RTI: An integrated approach to teaching in today′s classrooms. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

Dole, F. E., & Wibowo, U. B. (2013). Kemampuan guru mengimplementasikan KTSP pada SD di kecamatan Detukeli Kabupaten Ende. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 1(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v1i2.2632

Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of educational programs. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Fung, D., Kutnick, P., Mok, I., Leung, F., Lee, B. P.-Y., Mai, Y. Y., & Tyler, M. T. (2017). Relationships between teachers’ background, their subject knowledge and pedagogic efficacy, and pupil achievement in primary school mathematics in Hong Kong: An indicative study. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.003

Gwet, K. L. (2012). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters (3rd ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics.

Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2017). The use and design of rubrics to support assessment for learning. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 99–111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_7

Kasih, P. A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2016). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa sekolah dasar melalui pembelajaran berbasis penilaian. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1776

Kaufman, R. A., & Thomas, S. (1980). Evaluation without fear. Newberry, FL: New Viewpoints.

Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran IPA SMP menggunakan model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552

Mardapi, D. (2009). Evaluasi penerapan ujian akhir sekolah dasar berbasis standar nasional. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v13i2.1411

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Maryani, I., & Fatmawati, L. (2015). Pendekatan scientific dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar: Teori dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Effects of teacher preparation courses: Do graduates use what they learned to plan mathematics lessons? American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 524–567. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695217

Ngware, M. W., Ciera, J., Musyoka, P. K., & Oketch, M. (2015). Quality of teaching mathematics and learning achievement gains: Evidence from primary schools in Kenya. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9594-2

Niwaz, A., Shah, S. Z. H., & Rajper, A. K. (2016). Lesson planning in teaching of mathematics: Teachers’ perceptions and current practices. The Sindh University Journal of Education, 45(1), 45–66.

Noviana, N., & Kartowagiran, B. (2015). Evaluasi implementasi penilaian otentik pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Kurikulum 2013 di SMA. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 157–166. Retrieved from http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jep/article/download/1271/1146

Ottmar, E. R., Decker, L. E., Cameron, C. E., Curby, T. W., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2014). Classroom instructional quality, exposure to mathematics instruction and mathematics achievement in fifth grade. Learning Environments Research, 17, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9146-6

Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014

Regulation of Minister of National Education No. 22 of 2006 on Content Standard. , (2006).

Regulation of the Minister of National Education No. 19 of 2005, on National Standard of Education. , (2005).

Regulation of the Minister of National Education No. 20 of 2007 on the educational assessment standard. , (2007).

Regulation the Minister of National Education of Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 2007 on Process Standard for Primary and Secondary Educational Units. , (2007).

Rosnani, R., Sugiyono, S., & Tampubolon, B. (2015). Peningkatan hasil belajar pada pembelajaran matematika menggunakan alat peraga realita di kelas 1 sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/8529/pdf

Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1985). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Salmayzuri, S., Ruslan, R., & Pristiwaluyo, T. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran matematika di SMA Negeri Watansoppeng. Riset Assesmen: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/assesment/article/view/1778

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Setiawan, I. (2016). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika pada materi pecahan siswa kelas III SD Negeri Bendungan III dengan alat peraga. Basic Education: Jurnal Elektronik Mahasiswa Prodi PGSD, 5(3), 214–226. Retrieved from http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pgsd/article/view/873

Singh, Y. K. (2008). Teaching practice: Lesson planning. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

Stake, R. E. (1996). For all program evaluations there’s a criterion problem. Evaluation - The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2(1), 99–103.

van de Walle, J. A. (2008). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah: Pengembangan pengajaran jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Wahyuni, N. D., & Jailani, J. (2017). Pengaruh pendekatan matematika realistik terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa SD. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v5i2.7785

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16473