Development and validity of mathematical learning assessment instruments based on multiple intelligence

Helmiah Suryani, SMAN 8 SAMARINDA KALIMANTAN TIMUR, Indonesia
Badrun Kartowagiran, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jailani Jailani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/pep.v21i1.15286

Abstract


This study was aimed to develop and produce an assessment instrument of mathematical learning results based on multiple intelligence. The methods in this study used Borg & Gall-Research and Development approach (Research & Development). The subject of research was 289 students. The results of research: (1) Result of Aiken Analysis showed 58 valid items were between 0,714 to 0,952. (2) Result of the Exploratory on factor analysis indicated the instrument consist of three factors i.e. mathematical logical intelligence-spatial intelligence-and linguistic intelligence. KMO value was 0.661 df 0.780 sig. 0.000 with valid category. This research succeeded to developing the assessment instrument of mathematical learning results based on multiple intelligence of second grade in elementary school with characteristics of logical intelligence of mathematics, spatial intelligence, and linguistic intelligence.

Keywords


multiple intelligence; logical intelligence mathematics; spatial intelligence; and linguistic intelligence; assessment; mathematics

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References


Ellis, A. B. (2011) Generalizing promoting actions: how classroom collaborations an support students' mathematical generalizations. Journal for research in Mathematics Education (JRME), 42(4).

Armstrong, T. (2003). Sekolah para juara: menerapkan multiple intelligences di dunia. Bandung: Kaifa.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. London: Longman Publishing.

Campbell, L. & Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (2002). Teaching & learning through multiple Intelligences (metode terbaru melesatkan kecerdasan). Bandung: Inisiasi Press.

Chatib, M. (2009). Sekolahnya manusia. Bandung: Kaifa.

Duskri, Kumaidi, & Suryanto. (2014) Pengembangan tes diagnostik kesulitan Belajar matematika SD. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1).

Douglas, O., Smith, K., & Reese, N. (2008). The effects of the multiple intelligences teaching strategy on the academic achievement of eighth grade math students. Journal of Intructional Psychology, 35(2), 182.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Kartowagiran, B. (2012) Penulisan butir soal. Yogyakarta: UNY

Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan (2016).

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assessment of student (6th ed.). New York: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1).

Stiggins, R.J., & Chappuis, J. (2011). An Introduction to student –involved assessment for learning. California: Pearson.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.15286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics