Bias Item Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen dan Modifikasinya sebagai Tes Kreativitas

Bambang Subali

doi:10.21831/pep.v14i2.1084

Bias Item Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen dan Modifikasinya sebagai Tes Kreativitas

Bambang Subali,

10.21831/pep.v14i2.1084

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui bias item tes keterampilan proses sains pola divergen dan modifikasinya sebagai tes kreativitas biologi SMA untuk assessment for learning. Penelitian menggunakan intrumen keterampilan proses sains pola divergen untuk biologi SMA (Bambang Subali, 2009). Dua dari enam instrumen pengukur keterampilan proses sains tersebut dimodifikasi menjadi instrumen pengukur kreativitas keterampilan proses sains dan diujikan pada 1095 peserta didik. Penskoran dalam skala politomus dan dianalisis menurut Partial Credit Model 1-PL dengan program QUEST. Analisis bias didasarkan faktor gender, lokasi, dan jenjang kelas. Hasil pengukuran menunjukkan, dengan kriteria mean INFIT MNSQ 1,0 ± 0,0 tes fit dengan model. Berdasarkan kriteria batas INFIT MNSQ 0,77 - 1,30 seluruh item fit dengan model. Hasil penyelidikan bias ternyata sebagian item bias, baik dari segi gender, lokasi, atau jenjang kelas.

Kata kunci: alat ukur keterampilan proses sains pola divergen, alat ukur kreativitas keterampilan proses sains, bias item, PCM-1PL

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abrams, L.M. (2007). Implications of high-stakes testing for the use of formative classroom assessment. In: McMillan, J.H. (2007). Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Adams, R.J. & Kho, Seik-Tom. (1996). Acer quest version 2.1. Camberwell, Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

Atherton, (2005) Learning and Teaching : convergent and divergent learning, diambil pada tanggal 03 Desember 2006 dari http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/ converge. html.

Badrun Kartowagiran. (2005). Perbandingan berbagai metode untuk mendeteksi bias butir. Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas gadjah Mada. Tidak dipublikasikan.

Bambang Subali. 2009. Pengukuran Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi SMA di Provinsi DIY dan Jawa Tengah. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNY

Bambang Subali & Etty Surastuti. (1991). Jurnal Kependidikan No. 2, Th XXI, Agustus 1991 (hlm. 6 -7).

Behringer, M.P. (1985). Women’s role and status in the sciences: An historical perspecetive. In: Kazhle, J.B . (ed.). Women in science: A report from the field. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.).

Boscardin, Ch.K., Agirre-Munos, Z., Chinen, M., Leon, S. & Shon, Hye Sook. (2004). Consequenses and validity of performance assessment for English leaners: Assessing opportunity to learn (OTL) in grade 6 language arts. CSE Report 635. California: The Regents of the University of California.

Bowell, T. & Kemp, G. (2002). Critical thinking: A concise guide. London: Routledge.

Brown, R.S. & Villarreal, J.C. (2007). Correcting for person misfit in aggregated score reporting. International Journal of Testing, 7 (1): 1-25, (Online), 28 Oktober 2007.

Brum & McKane. (1989). Study guide biology: Exploring life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Bryce, T.G.K., McCall, J., MacGregor, J., Robertson, I.J., dan Weston,

R.A.J. 1990. Techniques for assessing process skills in practical science: Teacher’s guide. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.

Carin, A.A. dan Sund, R.B. (1989). Teaching science through discovery.

Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.

Collete, A.T. & Chiappetta, EL. (1994). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Scholls. 3-rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Conny R. Semiawan (1997). Perpektif pendidikan anak berbakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Cromie, W.J. (2007). Creativity tied to mental illness: Irrelevance can make you mad. http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/reativity.html, diambil tanggal 29 Januari 2009.

Dettmer, P. (2006). New Blooms in Established Fields: four domains of learning and doing [Versi elektronik]. Roeper Review, 28, 2, 70-78.

Djohar. (1989). Dimensi pendidikan sains menyongsong tahun 2000. Pidato pengukuhan sebagai guru besar dalam bidang pendidikan sains pada FPMIPA IKIP YOGYAKARTA. Diucapkan pada rapat se nat terbuka IKIP YOGYAKARTA 11 -03-1989.

Drake, S.M. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: Aligning curriculum, content, assessment and instruction. 2-nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Ebel, R.L. & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ferrando, M., Prieto, M.D., Ferrandiz, C. & Sanchesz, C. 2005. Intelligence and Creativity. Electronic Journal of Reseacrch in Education, ISSN: 1696- 2095, 7, 3(3): 21-50, online, diambil pada tanggal 29 Januari 2009.

Garry, R. (1970). The nature and conditions of learning. 3-rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hambleton, R & Rodgers, J. 1995. Item Bias Review. Practical assessment, research & evaluation (Online), http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp? v=4&n=6. This paper has been viewed 72,341 times since 11/13/1999, diambil pada tanggal 20 Maret 2009.

Hibbard, K.M. (t.t.). Performance assessment in the science classroom.

Jehlen, A. (2007). Testing how the sausage is made [Versi elektronik].

NEA Today, 25, 7, 29-34.

Keeves & Alagumalai. (1999). New Approach to measurement. In: Masters, G.N. & Keeves, J.P. (eds.). Advances in Measurement in Educational Research and Assessment. Amasterdam: Pergamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science.

Kelly, K. E. (2007). A brief measure of creativity among college students [Versi elektronik]. College Student Journal, 38, 4, 594-596.

Kelly, M. (2010). Test bias. (Online), (http://712educators.about.com/ od/assessments/g/testbias.html. Diambil pada tanggal 20 Maret 2010.

Kim, Kyung Hee. 2005. Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta- analysis. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, (16), (2-3): 57-66. (Online), diambil pada tanggal 28 Oktober 2007.

Kind, P. M. & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science [Versi elektronik]. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1-37.

Koch, J. & Blunk, S.M. (1996). Breaking the “mold” –STS allow celebrating individual differences. In: Yager, R.E. (ed.) Science/ Technology/ Society as Reform in Sciences Education. New York: State University of New York Press.

Masters, G.N. (1999). Partial credit model. In: Masters, G.N. & Keeves,

J.P. (eds.). Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment.

Amasterdam: Pergamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science.

Matyas, M.L. (1985). Obstacles and constrains on women in science: Preparation and participation in the scientific community. In: Kazhle, J.B. (ed.). Women in science: A report from the field. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

Matyas,M.L. (1985). Factors affecting female achievement and interest in science and scientific carriers. In: Kazhle, J.B. (ed.). Women in science: A report from the field. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

McShane, J.Br. & Yager, R.E. (1996). Advantages of STS for minority students. In: Yager, R.E. (1996). Science/ Technology/ Society as ref orm in sciences education. New York: State University of New York Press (hlm. 131).

Mehrens, W.A. (1989). Preparing Students to Take Standardized Achievement Tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 1(11). (Online), http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=1 &n=11 . This paper has been viewed 43,492 times since 11/13/1999, diambil tanggal 20 Maret 2009.

Pollman, J., Uprichard, E., Malone, U., & Coop, R. (1973). Multivariate Analysis of The Relationship Between Creativity and Intelllegence. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Reserach Association, New Orleans, Lousiana, February 25-March 1, 1973.

Puckett, M.B. & Black, J.K. (1994). Authentic assessment of the young child: Celebrating development and learning. New York: Merrill, and imprint of Macmillan College Pupbishing Company.

Rezba, R.J., Sparague, C.S., Fiel, R.L., Funk, H.J., Okey, J.R., & Jaus, H.H. (1995). Learning and assessing science process skills. 3rd ed. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Rudner, L.M. (1994). Questions to Ask When Evaluating Tests. Practical assessment, research & evaluation , 4(2). (Online), (http://PAREonline.net/ getvn. asp?v=4&n=2 . This paper has been viewed 74,335 times since 11/13/1999, diakses 20 Maret 2009).

Schaeffer, R. (2007). Gender Bias in College Admissions Tests. FairTest: The National Center for Fair and Open Testing. Dikirim tanggal 20 Agustus 2007. Diambil tanggal 20 Agustus 2008. dari

Schnohr, C.W., Kreiner, S., Due, E.P., Currie , C., Boyce, W., & Diderichsen, F. (2007). Differential item functioning of a family affluence scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02. [Versi Elektronik]. Springer Science+Business Media B.V . Nov. 2007.

Skiba, R.J., Simmons, A.B., Ritter, SH., Gibe, A.C., Rausch, M.K., Cuadrado, J., Choong-Geun Chung. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Excepcional children, Spring 2008; 74, 3; 264-288.

Tellez, K. (2003). Three themes on standards in teacher education: Legislative expediency, the role of external review, and the bias in the assessment of pedagogical knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly; winter 2003; 30: 1: 9-18.

Torrance, E.P. (1979). Three stage model for teaching for creative thinking. Dalam: Lawson, A.E. The Psychology of Teaching For Thinking and Creativity. Columbus: ERIC.

Towle, A. (1989). Modern biology. Austin: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Wright, B.D. & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating scale analsis. Chicago: Mesa Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v14i2.1084