Enhancing Students' Argumentation and Reflective Judgment in Biology learning through LMS based on Socio-Scientific Issues

Edysyah Putra, Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
Dinda Vebrina, Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to develop a biology learning device based on socio-scientific issues (SSI) assisted by a Learning Management System (LMS). It employs the ADDIE development model, which consists of the stages of Analysis, including needs analysis, initial and final analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The research subjects consisted of one material expert, one media expert, and 36 high school students. Data were collected using assessment instruments and questionnaires to obtain reviews and recommendations from experts on the developed biology learning device. Based on data analysis from the assessment results of two validators, the average score (PRS) of biology learning devices in the aspect of biological study information is 80 (high), the aspect of learning organization is 82 (high), the aspect of web/LMS operational presentation is 82 (high), and the aspect of biological study language is 84 (high), thus making the overall average of 82.29 (high). From the PRS results obtained, it can be concluded that the LMS biology learning device based on SSI to improve the argumentation and reflective judgment skills of high school students meets the validity aspect and can be implemented in high school students' biology learning.


Keywords


Biology Learning Tools, SSI, LMS, Argumentation, Reflective Judgment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achwan, R., Ganie-Rochman, M., Alamsyah, AR, & Triana, L. (2020). University reform and the development of social sciences in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 78(December 2019), 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102269

Ahmad Dhomiri, Junedi Junedi, & Mukh Nursikin. (2023). Basic Concepts and Roles and Functions of Curriculum in Education. Khatulistiwa: Journal of Education and Social Humanities, 3(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i1.972

Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A. (2015). Video games, cognitive exercises, and the enhancement of cognitive abilities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 4, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.002

Anwar, NP, & Ali, MA (2020). The effect of socio-scientific issue (SSI) based discussion: A student-centred approach to the teaching of argumentation. SOTL in the South, 4(2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v4i2.76

Ardoin, N.M., Bowers, A.W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241(July), 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Astarina, AD, Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2019). The effect of POGIL learning in the context of socioscientific issues on the quality of high school students' argumentation skills on chemical bonding material. Journal of Science Education Innovation, 5(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20890

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A.K., & Myers, S.A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students' cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889

Callahan, B. E. (2009). Enhancing the nature of scientific understanding, reflective judgment, and argumentation through socioscientific issues. 179. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1886

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2015). The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction on reflective judgment performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.12.002

Fadli Pribadi, M., & Fatima, A. (2022). Efforts to Empower the Community in the Effort to Keep the River Clean Through Collective Activities and Spreading Catfish and Tilac Seeds in Gunung Handeuleum Village. AMK: UIKA Community Service, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.32832/amk.v1i1.1722

Fayrus, & Slamet, A. (2022). Development Research Model (R n D).

Gan, B., Menkhoff, T., & Smith, R. (2015). Enhancing students' learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.048

Ghazal, S., Al-Samarraie, H., & Aldowah, H. (2018). “i am Still Learning”: Modeling LMS Critical Success Factors for Promoting Students' Experience and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment. IEEE Access, 6, 77179–77201.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879677

Grammer, J., Coffman, J. L., & Ornstein, P. (2013). The effect of teachers' memory-relevant language on children's strategy use and knowledge. Child Development, 84(6), 1989–2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12100

Gültepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2021). The Effects of Scientific Argumentation on High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13

Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The effects of using socio-scientific issues and technology in problem-based learning: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640

Jacobs, B., & Usher, A. (2018). Proximity as a Window into the Zone of Proximal Development. Information Literacy and Computer Education Journal, 9(1), 2856–2863. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0376

Jonassen, D.H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8

Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015

King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions Through Adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2

Kinslow, A.T., Sadler, T.D., & Nguyen, H.T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418

Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(81)90032-0

Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative Pedagogies in Higher Education to Become Effective Teachers of 21st Century Skills: Unpacking the Learning and Innovation Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p37

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9(December 2023), 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Lestari, ASB, Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., Chandra, TD, & Indrawatiningsih, N. (2021). Exploring the Argumentation Skills of Prospective Teachers based on Commognitive Approach using Moodle LMS. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1370–1376. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-46

Lewis, P. J. (2016). Brain Friendly Teaching—Reducing Learner's Cognitive Load. Academic Radiology, 23(7), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.018

Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., Sahlberg, P., Ward, K., Bentsen, P., Curry, C., & Cowper, R. (2022). Getting Out of the Classroom and Into Nature: A Systematic Review of Nature-Specific Outdoor Learning on School Children's Learning and Development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058

Martini, Widodo, W., Qosyim, A., Mahdiannur, MA, & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Improving undergraduate science education students' argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 428–438.

https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I3.30050

Mönch, C., & Markic, S. (2022). Science Teachers' Pedagogical Scientific Language Knowledge—A Systematic Review. Educational Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070497

Neratania, A. (2024). Developing Physics Teaching Materials Based on Differentiated Merdeka Curriculum Using an Ethnoscience-Integrated Contextual Approach. 10(2), 160–174.

Noorhosseini, SA, Allahyari, MS, Damalas, CA, & Moghaddam, SS (2017). Public environmental awareness of water pollution from urban growth: The case of Zarjub and Goharrud rivers in Rasht, Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600(2017), 2019–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.128

Omran, J., Firwana, B., Al-Dadah, A., & Alpert, M. (2015). Relation of Obesity To Ventricular Repolarization: a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(10), A337. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(15)60337-0

Paulins, V. A., & Moeller, G. J. (2017). Implementing and evaluating a student success initiative (SSI) to support enhanced and active learning in a merchandising mathematics course. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2016.1246618

Puspitarini, YD, & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a

Roksa, J., Trolian, T. L., Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2017). Facilitating academic performance in college: understanding the role of clear and organized instruction. Higher Education, 74(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0048-2

Setyaningsih, A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Parmin, P. (2019). The effect of process oriented-guided inquiry learning in the context of socio-scientific issues in acid-base learning on the argumentation skills of grade XI high school students. Journal of Science Education Innovation, 5(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.20693

Subiantoro, AW, Ariyanti, NA, & Sulistyo. (2013). Learning ecosystem material with socio-scientific issues and its influence on students' reflective judgment. Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2508

Subiantoro, AW, Handziko, RC, & Wibowo, Y. (2021). A narrative inquiry of socio-scientific issues-based e-learning development in biology to promote student health literacy. Biosphere, 14(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.21009/biospherejpb.20373

Sudjana. (2007). Learning media. Sinar Baru Algasindo.

Tsai, C.Y. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students' scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers and Education, 116, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009

Viehmann, C., Fernández Cárdenas, J.M., & Reynaga Peña, C.G. (2024). The Use of Socioscientific Issues in Science Lessons: A Scoping Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145827

Yang, Y. (2023). Assessing alignment between curriculum standards and teachers' instructional practices in China's school music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221099852

Yılmaz, A. (2021). The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers' critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 163–199. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.35.8.2

Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B.E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v11i1.78125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA indexed by:



Creative Commons License
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved. p-ISSN: 2406-9205 | e-ISSN: 2477-4820

View My Stats