Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation

Riwayani Riwayani; Riki Perdana; Ratna Sari; Jumadi Jumadi; Heru Kuswanto

doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548

Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation

Riwayani Riwayani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Riki Perdana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ratna Sari, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jumadi Jumadi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Heru Kuswanto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548

Abstract

Terdapat banyak model pembelajaran yang diterapkan untuk menganalisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa. Namun, belum banyak model yang diintegrasikan dengan pembelajaran berbasis simulasi online untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa. Padahal, saat ini ada banyak website simulasi online yang diterbitkan oleh lembaga pendidikan atau universitas di tingkat internasional dan jarang digunakan dalam penelitian. Penelitian ini mengintegrasikan model pembelajaran inovatif dengan pembelajaran berbasis online simulation untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa. Website simulasi yang digunakan adalah Edu-media simulation. Dalam website ini ada banyak simulasi fisika yang disediakan, tetapi belum banyak penelitian yang menerapkan simulasi ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan kuasi eksperimen yang terdiri dari satu kelas eksperimen dengan sampel 25 siswa kelas XI MIA 3 di SMA N 1 Prambanan Yogyakarta. Argumentasi ilmiah siswa diukur melalui instrumen tes uraian. Data argumentasi ilmiah siswa dianalisis menggunakan paired sample t-test dan pola argumentasi Toulmin (TAP). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PBL berbantuan edu-media simulation dapat meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa baik secara kuantitatif maupun kualitatif. Ini ditunjukkan dengan nilai t value -11.051 < -1.711 bahwa terdapat perbedaan nilai rata-rata argumentasi pada pre-test (17) dan post-test (47). Dalam hal ini, siswa sudah mampu membuat klaim yang tegas dengan menyajikan bukti dan alasan yang mendukung klaim.

Analyzing students’ scientific argumentation skill in optic: Problem-based learning assisted edu-media simulation

Abstract

There are many learning models applied to analyze the ability of students' scientific argumentation. However, not many models have been integrated with online simulation-based learning to improve students' scientific argumentation skills. In fact, there are currently many online simulation websites published by educational institutions or international universities and rarely used in research. This research integrates innovative learning models with online simulation-based learning to improve students' scientific argumentation skills. The simulation website used is Edu-media simulation. In this website there are many physics simulations provided, but not many studies have applied this simulation. This research was conducted with a quasi-experimental consisting of one experimental class with a sample of 25 XI MIA 3 graders in Prambanan High School 1 Yogyakarta. Students' scientific arguments are measured through a description test instrument. Students' scientific argumentation data were analyzed using paired sample t-test and Toulmin argumentation patterns (TAP). The results showed that PBL assisted by edu-media simulation can improve students' scientific argumentation ability both quantitatively and qualitatively. This is indicated by the value of t value -11.051 <-1.711 that there are differences in the average value of argumentation in the pre-test (17) and post-test (47). In this case, students have been able to make assertive claims by presenting evidence and reasons that support the claim.

Keywords

Edu-media simulation; PBL; Argumentasi Ilmiah; Simulasi online; Pembelajaran berbasis masalah; Argumentasi Ilmiah

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Ault, M., Craig-Hare, J., Frey, B., Ellis, J. D., & Bulgren, J. (2015). The effectiveness of reason racer, a game designed to engage middle school students in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.967542

Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing pre- service science teachers’ understanding of scientific argumentation: What do they know about argumentation after four years of college science? Science Education International, 26(2), 217–239.

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 667–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9148-z

Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402

Chien, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Supporting socio-scientific argumentation in the classroom through automatic group formation based on students’ real-time responses. In Science Education in East Asia (pp. 549–563). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_22

Clark, D., Sampson, V., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., … Laurinen, L. (2010). Online learning environments, scientific argumentation, and 21st Century skills. In E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Environments (pp. 1–39). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-729-9.ch001

Duff, E., Miller, L., & Bruce, J. (2016). Online virtual simulation and diagnostic reasoning: A scoping review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(9), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.001

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015). Malaysian students’ scientific argumentation: Do groups perform better than individuals? International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147

Hsu, P.-S., Van Dyke, M., Smith, T. J., & Looi, C.-K. (2018). Argue like a scientist with technology: the effect of within-gender versus cross-gender team argumentation on science knowledge and argumentation skills among middle-level students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 733–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9574-1

Katsh-Singer, R., Mcneill, K. L., & Loper, S. (2016). Scientific argumentation for all? Comparing teacher beliefs about argumentation in high, mid, and low socioeconomic status schools. Science Education, 100(3), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21214

Loyens, S. M. M., Jones, S. H., Mikkers, J., & van Gog, T. (2015). Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 38, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.03.002

Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314558490

Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1427568

Mubarok, O. S., Muslim, M., & Danawan, A. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan saintifik terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMA pada materi pengukuran. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 3(0), 381–388. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/9862

Muliardi, M. W. R., Supeno, S., & Bektiarso, S. (2018). Lembar kerja siswa scientific explanation untuk melatihkan kemampuan penjelasan ilmiah siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran fisika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika (Vol. 3, pp. 33–38). Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/7366

Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Rezaei, M. (2018). A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education, 120, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.010

Putri, R. E. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP Kelas VII melalui bahan ajar IPA terpadu dengan tema HALO pada topik kalor. SEMESTA: Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 1(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.24036/semesta/vol1-iss1/10

Rahman, A., Diantoro, M., & Yuliati, L. (2018). Kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada hukum Newton di sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(7), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPTPP.V3I7.11337

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-Century skills requires 21st-Century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2011). A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9

Sudarmo, N. A., Lesmono, A. D., & Harijanto, A. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah siswa SMA pada konsep termodinamika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v7i2.7928

Tee, M. Y., & Karney, D. (2010). Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9095-3

Tsai, C.-Y. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009

von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20213

Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2016). Kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah dan pemecahan masalah fisika siswa SMA pada materi gaya dan gerak. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang. Retrieved from http://pasca.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Adetya-Dewi-13-28.pdf

Wibawa, R. A. P., Prayitno, B. A., & Marjono, M. (2017). Penerapan problem based learning pada materi pencemaran lingkungan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa kelas X MIPA. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 14, p. 361). Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/18808

Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986

Yun, S. M., & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in students’ participation and small group norms in scientific argumentation. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9432-z

Zhu, M., Lee, H.-S., Wang, T., Liu, O. L., Belur, V., & Pallant, A. (2017). Investigating the impact of automated feedback on students’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1648–1668. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1347303

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548