Improving Responsibility and Mathematical Critical Thinking of Grade IV A Students of SDN Kentungan Through Contextual Learning Model

Alip Tripambudi, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
Christiyanti Aprinastuti, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
M.M. Suyatini, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia

Abstract


The background of this research was the low responsibility and low mathematical critical thinking of fourth-grade students of SDN Kentungan in. This study aimed to: 1) describe efforts to improve the students' responsibility and critical thinking through the application of a contextual learning model; 2) improve the responsibility of fourth-grade students through the application of contextual learning models; 3) improve the critical thinking of fourth-grade students through the application of contextual learning models. The type of this research was Classroom Action Research (CAR). The subjects of this study were 24 grade IVA students of SDN Kentungan in the 2020/2021 Academic Year. The object of this research was to improve the students’ responsibility and critical thinking. The instruments used in this study were questionnaires and observation sheets. The data analysis technique was descriptive quantitative. The results showed that: 1) Efforts to increase students' responsibility and critical thinking have been successfully carried out by using the contextual learning model through the following steps; a) Relating, b) Experiencing, c) Cooperating, d) Applying, e) Transfering. 2) The application of a contextual learning model improved the students’ responsibility. It could be seen from the increase in the average score for the initial conditions of 53,3% (less responsible). In the first cycle, it increased to 60.3% (Sufficiently Responsible). Then, in the second cycle, it increased to 73.5% (responsible). 3) The application of a contextual learning model improved the students' critical thinking. It could be seen from the increase in the initial condition average score of 56.2% (less critical). In the first cycle, it increased to 60.1% (quite critical), and in the second cycle, it increased to 71.85% (critical).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fitri, Agus Zaenul. (2012). Pendidikan Karakter berbasis Nilai dan Etika di Sekolah. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Hamdayama,J. (2014). Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif Dan Berkarakter.Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Johnson, Elaine B. (2006). Contextual Teaching and Learning: menjadikan kegiatan belajar mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Kunandar. (2014). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013): Suatu Pendekatan Praktis Disertai Dengan Contoh. Ed. Rev. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kurniasih, I. dan Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 konsep dan penerapannya. Surabaya: Kata Pena.

Kuswana, Wowo Sunaryo. (2012). Taksonomi Kognitif Perkembangan Ragam Berpikir. Bandung: Rosda.

Maulida. (2014). Pengaruh subject specific pedagogy tematik integratif terhadap karakter kedisiplinan, tanggungjawab, dan peduli lingkungan siswa kelas I sekolah dasar negeri 01 Singkawang Tengah Kalimantan Barat. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Mujis, D. d. (2008). Effective Teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Muslich, M. (2007). Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara.

Narwanti, Sri. (2011). Pendidikan karakter. Yogyakarta: Familia.

Nurhadi. (2003). Pendekatan Konstekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Priansa. (2017). Pengembangan Strategi & Model Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sanjaya. (2011). Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan, Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Setiawan. (2014). Pendekatan ctl dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar pada mata pelajaran matematika. Diakses http://jurnal.stkippersada.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jpimat/article/view/406. Diunduh pada 15 Februari 2021.

Shoimin, Ari (2014). 68 model pembelajaran inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Suprijono. Agus (2009). Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Susanto. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rusman. (2016). Model-Model Pemblejaran (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: PT Raja Gafindo Persada.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Zubaedi. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter: Konsep Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Lembaga Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v4i2.41066

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v4i2.41066.g17136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Alip Tripambudi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats