Penerapan penilaian autentik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Authors

  • Dasmalinda Dasmalinda PROGRAM MAGISTER PPKN FIS UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG
  • Hasrul Hasrul PROGRAM MAGISTER PPKN FIS UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i1.29000

Keywords:

penilaian autentik, kurikulum 2013,

Abstract

Dalam pelaksanaan penilaian autentik seorang guru masih banyak mengalami kendala terutama dalam penyusunan instrumen dan pengklasifikasian domainnya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan penilaian autentik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran PPKn. Jenis penelitian ini adalah metode campuran (Mixed Methods ) dengan pendekatan Sequential Exploratory Design. Informan dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh guru PPKn SMKN 1 solok yang berjumlah 5 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan reduksi data, penyajian data dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian mengambarkan bahwa, umumnya guru SMKN 1 Solok belum menggunakan instrumen penilaian autentik untuk mengukur hasil belajar dan sikap peserta didik. Harapan penelitian ini dalam pelaksanaan penilaian autentik guru mampu melaksanakan sesuai dengan kurikulum 2013.

-----

In the implementation of authentic assessment, a teacher still experiences many obstacles, especially in the preparation of instruments and the classification of their domains. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of authentic assessment based on the 2013 curriculum in learning PPKn. This type of research uses a mixed-method with the sequential exploratory design approach. The informants in this study were all five students of SMKN 1 Solok, with five people. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques using data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results of the study illustrate that, generally, SMK 1 Solok teachers have not used authentic assessment instruments to measure student learning outcomes and attitudes. The expectation of this research in the implementation of authentic teacher assessment can carry out under the 2013 curriculum.

References

Abdullah. (2016). Implementasi penilaian autentik kurikulum 2013 pada pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 2 Palangka Raya. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 2(2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v2i2.470

Adisusilo, S. (2012). Pembelajaran nilai-karakter: Kontruktivisme dan VCT sebagai inovasi pendekatan pembelajaran afektif. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Aiman, U. (2016). Evaluasi pelaksanaan penilaian autentik kurikulum 2013; studi kasus di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri Tempel Sleman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah, 1(1), 115–122.

Allen, K. N., & Friedman, B. (2010). Affective learning: A taxonomy for teaching social work values. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(2), 1–12.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwol, D. R. (Ed.). (2010). Kerangka landasan pembelajaran, pengajaran dan asesmen. Pustaka Pelajar.

Beane, J. A. (1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality. National Middle School Association.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mahmud. (2014). Kendala guru melakukan penilaian pada proses pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar Gugus Delima Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pesona Dasar, 2(3), 33–44.

Mansyur, Harun, R., & Suratno. (2015). Asesmen pembelajaran di sekolah: Panduan bagi guru dan calon guru. Pustaka Pelajar.

Markle, R., & O'Banion, T. (2014). Assessing affective factors to improve retention and completion. Learning Abstracts, 17(11), 1–16.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Normnan E. Gronlund. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching (10 ed.). Prentice Hall.

Pierre, E., & Oughton, J. (2007). The affective domain: Undiscovered country. College Quarterly, 10(4), 1–7. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ813766%5Cnhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ813766.pdf

Popham, W. J. (1999). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. ERIC.

Ruslan, Fauziah, T., & Alawiyah, T. (2016). Kendala Guru dalam Menerapkan Penilaian Autentik di SD Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 147–157. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/188254-ID-kendala-guru-dalam-menerapkan-penilaian.pdf

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sya'idah, U., Amaliyah, A., & Ismail, Y. (2016). Kemampuan guru PAI dalam merencanakan dan melaksanakan penilaian autentik. Jurnal Online Studi Al-Qur'an, 12(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.21009/jsq.012.2.01

Wuryani, W., & Irham, M. (2014). Penilaian dalam perspektif kurikulum 2013. Insania, 19(1), 181–199.

Zuhera, Y., Habibah, S., & Mislinawati. (2017). Kendala Guru dalam Memberikan Penilaian Terhadap Sikap Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri 14 Banda Aceh. Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 73–87.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-03

How to Cite

Dasmalinda, D., & Hasrul, H. (2020). Penerapan penilaian autentik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 17(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i1.29000

Issue

Vol 17, No 1 (2020)

Section

Article

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraanas a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author's institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA License.