Potensi Guru Matematika SMP Mengembangkan LKS Terintegrasi Evaluasi Digitalnya untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Matematis Siswa

Authors

  • Emi Pujiastuti Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Sugiman Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Endang Sugiharti Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Nanang Sungkowo SMP Negeri 5 Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v20i1.90280

Keywords:

digitalisasi, pembelajaran matematika, kreativitas matematis

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi pendidikan mendorong perlunya inovasi dalam pembelajaran matematika, salah satunya melalui digitalisasi Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) yang terintegrasi dengan evaluasinya untuk mendukung Kompetensi Kreativitas Matematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan memperoleh gambaran kemampuan guru matematika SMP di wilayah eks-Karesidenan Semarang dalam melakukan digitalisasi LKS tersebut, sekaligus menilai kompetensi kreativitas matematis siswa selama implementasinya. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Sampel terdiri atas 20 guru matematika, enam di antaranya diwawancarai untuk pendalaman kualitatif. Analisis kuantitatif dilakukan menggunakan uji-t berbantuan SPSS, sedangkan analisis kualitatif melalui reduksi data, penyajian data, interpretasi, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil menunjukkan rata-rata kemampuan guru sebesar 87,98 dan penerimaan positif terhadap digitalisasi LKS sebagai inovasi pembelajaran. Kompetensi kreativitas matematis siswa dari dua SMP menunjukkan nilai rata-rata 85,44 dan 83,00 setelah implementasi. Kendala utama mencakup keterbatasan jaringan Wi-Fi dan kebutuhan kuota internet. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa digitalisasi LKS efektif mendukung kreativitas matematis siswa serta layak diterapkan lebih luas, dengan dukungan pelatihan guru dan penguatan infrastruktur teknologi.

References

Ayvaz-Tuncel, Z., & çobanoglu, F. (2018). In-service teacher training: Problems of the teachers as learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11411a

Barraza-García, Z. M., Romo-Vázquez, A., & Roa-Fuentes, S. (2020). A theoretical model for the development of mathematical talent through mathematical creativity. Education Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040118

Chonillo-sislema, L. O. (2023). LA HERRAMIENTA INTERACTIVA LIVEWORKSHEET COMO RECURSO DIDÁCTICO EN EL PROCESO DE ENSEÑANZA-. 06(versión 1).

Creswell, J. W. W. (2018). Research Design – Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Edi). Sage Publication. Inc.

Enochsson, A. B. (2018). Reflective discussions in teacher training: A comparison between online and offline discussions of course literature in a class of pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9602-5

Er, Z., Artut, P. Di̇., & Bal, A. P. (2023). Developing The Mathematical Thinking Scale for Gifted Students. 13(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.1

Gupta, S., Abbas, A. F., & Srivastava, R. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Bibliometric Analysis from Inception. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 10(3), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v10n3.598

K. Dange, J., & Siddaraju, J. (2020). Role of Teacher Training Program in Enhancing Quality Education. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 5(6), 137. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20200506.14

Khastini, R. O., Rohmah, W. S., & Sahida, A. N. (2023). The Effectiveness of the e-Student Worksheets to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills on Digestive System Concepts. International Journal of Biology Education Towards Sustainable Development, 3(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijbetsd.v3i1.160

Levenson, E. S., & Molad, O. (2022). Analyzing collective mathematical creativity among post high-school students working in small groups. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 54(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01321-7

Mann, E. L. (2006). The Essence of Mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Indiana, 30(2), 236–260.

Meier, M. A., Burgstaller, J. A., Benedek, M., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. (2021). Mathematical creativity in adults: Its measurement and its relation to intelligence, mathematical competence and general creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010010

Pujiastuti, E., & Mashuri. (2016). Development of Training Model for Making of Teaching Aids Based on Scientific Approach and Its Application. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(11), 79–88.

Pujiastuti, E., & Suyitno, A. (2016). Peningkatan Keterampilan Peer Teaching yang Berkarakter Melalui Implementasi Perangkat Perkuliahan Daspros Pembelajaran Matematika 2 Bercirikan Konservasi. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i1.4977

Rahman, A., & Muktadir, M. G. (2021). SPSS: An Imperative Quantitative Data Analysis Tool for Social Science Research. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 05(10), 300–302. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2021.51012

Rahyuningsih, S., Nurhusain, M., & Indrawati, N. (2022). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Study involving Indonesian Students. Uniciencia, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.36-1.20

Sharma, S., Garg, S., & Mittal, S. (2015). Impact analysis of ICT teaching aids used for training and development of employees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 239–248.

Sriwongchai, A., Jantharajit, N., & Chookhampaeng, S. (2015). Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Model for Improving Creative Thinking in Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11), 77–87.

Supriyadi, S., Astuti, N., Utami Ningtias, I. W., & Izzatika, A. (2021). The Use of Student Worksheets Based on a Science Approach in Internalizing the Attitudes and Character of Elementary School Students. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2323

Tubb, A. L., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., Patston, T., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The development of mathematical creativity across high school: Increasing, decreasing, or both? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(January), 100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100634

Wulandari, O., Pujiati, P., & Subakti, A. (2021). Development student worksheets based question, read, reflect, recite, review (PQ4R) to improve creatives thinking skills. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i2.36726

Yu, Y. J., Park, Y. S., Keller, A., Noh, J. W., & Cha, J. (2021). A mixed-methods systematic review of the impacts of coronavirus on society and culture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020491

Zwart, D. P., Van Luit, J. E. H., Noroozi, O., & Goei, S. L. (2017). The effects of digital learning material on students’ mathematics learning in vocational education. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1313581

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Pujiastuti, E., Sugiman, Sugiharti, E., & Sungkowo, N. (2025). Potensi Guru Matematika SMP Mengembangkan LKS Terintegrasi Evaluasi Digitalnya untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Matematis Siswa. PYTHAGORAS Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v20i1.90280

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check