MOZAIK: Kajian Ilmu Sejarah states openly who supports the journal, and does not let any supporter influence editorial decisions. This follows Principles 10 (Ownership and management) and 14 (Business practices and revenue sources) of the COPE/DOAJ/OASPA/WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, and the COPE Core Practice on journal management.

—  The publisher and any other supporter have no role in deciding which manuscripts are reviewed, accepted, or published.

—  Supporters cannot see manuscripts or reviews, choose reviewers, or ask for changes to content.

—  Editors who have a conflict of interest with a supporter step aside from the manuscript. See Conflict of Interest.

—  Manuscripts by authors from UNY go through the same double-blind peer review as all other manuscripts. See the Peer Review Process.

The journal may accept support, such as grants for open access, conferences, or special issues, only on these conditions:

1.  The supporter and the nature of the support are named on this page before the support starts.

2.  Every supported article or issue goes through the journal’s normal peer review, and the editors keep full control of content and decisions.

3.  Supported content carries a clear statement of the support.

4.  Support that comes with conditions on content, authors, or outcomes is declined.

Research funding is different from sponsorship of the journal. Authors name every funder of their research, the grant number, and the funder’s role in a Funding statement, and declare any conflict of interest. See Publication Ethics and Conflict of Interest.

Questions about sponsorship or support can be sent to [MOZAIK email]. See also Revenue and Business Model  ·  Advertising Policy  ·  Direct Marketing Policy.