Komparasi keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT pada materi bangun datar

Andriani Suzana, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Ghozali Cilacap, Indonesia

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT; membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa SMP kelas VII dalam belajar bangun datar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT pada masing-masing variabel, digunakan uji one sample t-test. Selanjutnya, untuk membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT, data dianalisis menggunakan uji T2 Hotteling’s. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan sikap matematika siswa, namun tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis; tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa.  

Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL setting NHT, pendekatan CTL setting TGT, prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, sikap matematika siswa

 

The Comparison of the Effectiveness of CTL Approach of NHT Type and CTL Approach of TGT Type in Learning Planes

 

Abstract

This research aims to: describe the effectiveness of teaching mathematics by using the CTL approach of NHT type and the CTL approach of TGT type; compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude of 7th grade junior high school students in learning planes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. To determine the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type on each variable, one sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type, the data were analyzed using a multivariate test of T2 Hotteling’s. If there were differences in effectiveness, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results showed that: the teaching of mathematics using the CTL approach of NHT type and using the CTL approach of TGT type are effective in terms of mathematics learning achievement and mathematics attitude, but is not effective in terms of mathematical communication ability; there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach of NHT type and teaching using the CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude.

Keywords: CTL approach of NHT type, CTL approach of TGT type, mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, mathematics attitudes of students.

Keywords


pendekatan CTL setting NHT; pendekatan CTL setting TGT; prestasi belajar; kemampuan komunikasi matematis; sikap matematika siswa

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Amirin, I. (2012). Efektivitas pembelajaran matematika denganpendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) dikolaborasikan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipenumbered head together (NHT) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan keaktifan siswa kelas VIII SMP negeri. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/10867/

Azwar, S. (2010). Tes prestasi: Fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. http://doi.org/1998

Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: preparing students for the new economy. The Highlight Zone: Research © Work, (5), 1–9. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452376.pdf

Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods : research-based practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Publication.

Depdiknas. (2011). Laporan hasil dan statistik nilai ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Jakarta.

Depdiknas. (2012). Laporan hasil dan statistik nilai ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2011/2012. Jakarta.

Depdiknas. (2013). Laporan hasil dan statistik nilai ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Jakarta.

Glass, G. V, & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. New Jersey: Allyn and Bacon.

Hirschfeld-Cotton, K. (2008). Mathematical communication, conceptual understanding, and students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Nebraska. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=mathmidactionresearch

Huberty, C. J., Olejnik, S., & Huberty, C. J. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. London: SAGE Publications.

Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology Gameplaying for Maths LearningBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00593.x

Kose, S., Sahin, A., Ergun, A., & Gezer, K. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning experience on eight grade students achievement and attitude toward science. Education, 131(1), 169–180.

Marsigit. (2013a). Metode Pembelajaran yang cocok untuk Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta . Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3854314/Metode_Pembelajaran_yang_cocok_untuk_Kurikulum_2013

Marsigit. (2013b). Tantangan dan harapan Kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Yogyakarta: Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3727714/Tantangan_dan_Harapan_Kurikulum_2013

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan No.58 tentang kurikulum 2013 sekolah menengah pertama/madrasah tsanawiyah, Undang-undang (2014).

Muinah, M. (2011). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe team game tournament (TGT) dan numbered head together (NHT) pada prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Gantiwarno. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/40255/

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (volume I). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852548.pdf

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. London: Allyn and Bacon.

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice- Pearson Etext Access Card. Pearson College Div.

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. London: Routledge.

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). NCTM principles and standards for school mathematics,. Association Drive, Reston, VA: Library of Congres Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/store/Products/NCTM-Principles-and-Standards-for-School-Mathematics,-Full-Edition-(PDF)/

Trisnawati, T., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2015). Perbandingan keefektifan quantum teaching dan TGT pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari prestasi dan motivasi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 296. http://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7348

Widdiharto, R. (2004). Model-model pembelajaran matematika SMP. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Pusat Pengembangan Penataran Guru (PPG) Matematika.

Zakaria, E., Chin, L. C., & Daud, M. Y. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning on students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 272–275. Retrieved from http://thescipub.com/PDF/jssp.2010.272.275.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.12727

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved. p-ISSN 2356-2684 | e-ISSN 2477-1503

View My Stats