The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office whether it is suitable with our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. Every submitted manuscript which passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers. Plagiarism scanning will be conducted with the help of Turnitin.

The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). The manuscript will be sent to the reviewer anonymously. Reviewers' comment is also sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses

The decision made for the article is the result of the Editorial Team agreement based on the suggestions proposed by the reviewers.

Review Criteria

(1)   Relevance The topic should be in line with the aims and scope of the journal

(2)   Contribution (originality, novelty, and innovation)

(3)   Organization and Clarity

• Layout and format
• The title clearly describes the article
• The abstract should be clear, informative, descriptive, and provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach or solution, and point out major findings and conclusions
• Keywords consist of words or phrases which are important, specific or representative to the article.
• The introduction should provide a clear background, a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, the proposed approach or solution, the new value of research and end with the purpose of the study.
• The method includes research chronological, including research design, research procedures, instruments, and analysis techniques used in solving problems.
• Results and Discussion should be an objective description of the results and should be in relation to the purposes of research.
• Tables and  Images properly show the data and are easy to interpret and understand
• Language