Triple Helix Partnership Model Between Universities, Industry, and Government for Implementing an Outcome-Based Curriculum in the Era of Disruption at PTSP UNY: An Internal University Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpts.v7i1.83406Keywords:
Triple Helix Model, outcome-based curriculum, era of disruptionAbstract
Background: This study aims to describe: (1) the ideal triple helix model (THM) partnership for implementing an outcome-based curriculum (OBC) in the era of disruption from the university's perspective; (2) the level of THM implementation according to the university's perspective; (3) the THM ecosystem implemented by the university; (4) the level of university role implementation within the THM framework.
Method: This study employed both quantitative and qualitative descriptive research methods. Data collection techniques included a survey and a focus group discussion (FGD). The research subjects consisted of four active lecturers from PTSP FT UNY who provided survey responses, and seven PTSP lecturers participated in the FGD. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques, while qualitative data were examined through an interactive analytical model.
Results: (1) The balanced triple helix Model (BTM) was identified as the ideal framework for implementing OBC, rated highly suitable with a score of 3.50, as it ensures a balanced role among all parties. (2) The THM implementation was mostly realized (score 2.80), involving industry, professional associations, and certification bodies. (3) The THM ecosystem was mostly established (score 2.84), with additional support from unlimited research and partnership funding. (4) The university’s role within THM was fully realized (score 3.02) through seminars, soft skill training, and certification programs.
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, BTM is the ideal model for implementing OBC in the era of disruption. Furthermore, the implementation of the triple helix partnership model, ecosystem, and university roles is largely accomplished.
References
Arif, K. M. (2021). Strategi Membangun SDM yang Kompetitif, Berkarakter dan Unggul Menghadapi Era Disrupsi. Tahdzib Al-Akhlaq: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1–11.
Arikunto, S. (2016). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Diana, & Hakim, L. (2020). Strategi Kolaborasi Antara Perguruan Tinggi, Industri dan Pemerintah: Tinjauan Konseptual Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Inovasi Pendidikan dan Kreatifitas Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi (KNEMA), 1–14.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Fitriana, W. (2017). The Role of Triple Helix Actors for Agro-Tourism Development in West Sumatera. MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 33(2), 219–227.
Fitriani, F., Hudaya, C., & Hasri, D. A. (2023). Strategi pengembangan usaha tenun ikat Bima melalui penerapan Model Triple Helix. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(1), 810–819.
Flynn, J., Dance, S., & Schaefer, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its potential impact on employment demographics in the UK. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 6, 239–244.
Hermansyah, R., Utama, S. J., & Tamrin, M. H. (2019). Kemitraan Triple Helix Dalam Program Pemagangan Ke Jepang Di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Aplikasi Administrasi: Media Analisa Masalah Administrasi, 22(2), 1–10.
Kholis, A., Anggriyani, Lubis, S., & Nasirwan. (2021). Model Triple Helix dalam Kegiatan Corporate Social Responsibility. Medan: Economic & Business Publishing.
Kushari, B. L. S. (2022). a Learning Outcome Assessment Information System to Facilitate Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Implementation. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 28(2), 238–250.
Lasmawan, W. (2019). Era disrupsi & implikasinya bagi reposisi makna & praktek pendidikan (kaji petik dalam perspektif elektik sosial analisis). Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(1), 54-65.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The Transformation Of University-industry-government Relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5(4), 1–23.
Panisha, R. (2022). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Luaran di Era Disrupsi (Outcomes-Based Curriculum In Disruption Era - OBCiDE) Berdasarkan Stakeholders Internal di Program Studi S1 Teknik Sipil FT UNY. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 4(2), 168–176.
Priatna, T. (2019). Disrupsi pengembangan sumber daya manusia dunia pendidikan di era revoulusi industri 4.0. Bandung: Pusat Penelitian dan Penerbitan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Prihadi, W. R. (2019). Model Teacherpreneur pada Pembelajaran Vokasi Menghadapi Era Disrupsi dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 1(1), 50–58.
Prihantoro, C. R. (2020). Vocational high school readiness for applying curriculum outcome based education (OBE) in Industrial 4.0 era. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 251–267.
Putri, A. K. S. H. (2014). Strategi Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Berbasis Industri Kreatif Melalui Interaksi Triple Helix (Studi Kasus pada Interaksi Triple Helix dalam Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah Alas Kaki di Kabupaten Sidoarjo). Universitas Brawijaya.
Saleh, S. (2017). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Pustaka Ramadhan.
Salsabila, U. H., Ilmi, M. U., Aisyah, S., Nurfadila, & Saputra, R. (2020). Peran teknologi pendidikan dalam meningkatkan kualitas SDM. Jurnal on Education, 3(1), 104–112.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-Based Education Critical Issues and Answer. Arlington: The American Association of School Administrators.
Spoettl, G., & Vidmantas, T. (2020). Education & Training for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 83-93.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujanto, A. (2016). Pengembangan Kemitraan Lembaga Kursus dan Pelatihan (LKP) dengan Dunia Usaha dan Dunia Industri (DUDI) untuk Penjaminan Mutu LKP. Jurnal Ilmiah Infokam, 12(1), 59–65.
Suryaman, M. (2020). Orientasi pengembangan kurikulum medeka belajar. Seminar Daring Nasional: Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar, 13-28.
Sutarto. (2019). Filosofi dan Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi dalam Era Disrupsi. Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi Pada fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Warnandes, S., Hariyanto, L., & Indriatno Putra Pratama, G. N. (2022). Relevansi Kompetensi Lulusan S1 Pendidikan Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta dengan Kebutuhan Dunia Industri Jasa Konstruksi Bidang Perencana. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 4(1), 54–61.
Yumelking, M. (2023). Implementasi Pembelajaran Outcome Based Education (OBE). In Aktualisasi dan Problematika dalam Pembelajaran (hal. 57–62). Tulungagung: Akademia Pustaka.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ravena Rusma Ardita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. All works license under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
