Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (JPTK) is a scientific journal published by Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta and Masyarakat Peneliti Pendidikan Indonesia (MPPI). It is intended to support scientific information exchange.

JPTK specializes in topics related to curriculum, learning, evaluation, management, and policies on technological and vocational education including: electrical engineering education, electronics engineering education, mechanical engineering education, civil engineering education, automotive engineering education, fashion design education, hospitality engineering education, culinary engineering education, tourism engineering education, agribusiness engineering education, informatics engineering education, mechatronic engineering education and other technical education development. The articles submitted should be focused on the particular topics above.

The articles submitted should be focused on the particular topics above.

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The article submitted to Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (JPTK) will be reviewed by at least one reviewer and one peer-reviewer. The decision made for the article is the result of the Editorial Board’s agreement based on the suggestions proposed by the reviewer(s) and peer-reviewer(s). Plagiarism scanning will be conducted with the help of Google Scholar and an Anti-Plagiarism Software.

 

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (JPTK) is published twice a year in May and October

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journal, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta and Masyarakat Peneliti Pendidikan Indonesia). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in this journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society. 


Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta and Masyarakat Peneliti Pendidikan Indonesia as the publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the  Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.


Publication decisions

The editors of the journal are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers


Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.



Confidentiality


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.



Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.


Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.


Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.


Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.


Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.


Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.


Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.


Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Checklist for preparing your paper for publication

  1. Is your manuscript written in JPTK format?  At this stage, it is essential that you follow every detail of the JPTK format. Please try to follow the format as closely as possible.
  2. is your title adequate and is your abstract correctly written? The title of paper is max 12 words, without Acronym or abbreviation. The Abstract (MAX 150 WORDS) should be informative and completely self-explanatory (no citation in abstract), provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach or solution, and point out major findings and conclusions.
  3. Authors are suggested to present their articles in the sections structure: Introduction - The Proposed Method/Algorithm/Procedure specifically designed (optional) - Research Method - Results and Discussion – Conclusion. Authors may present complex proofs of theorems or non-obvious proofs of correctness of algorithms after introduction section (obvious theorems & straightforward proofs of existing theorems are NOT needed).
  4. Introduction section: explain the context of the study and state the precise objective. An Introduction should contain the following three part : Background: Authors have to make clear what the context is. Ideally, authors should give an idea of the state-of-the art of the field the report is about. The Problem: If there was no problem, there would be no reason for writing a manuscript, and definitely no reason for reading it. So, please tell readers why they should proceed reading. Experience shows that for this part a few lines are often sufficient. The Proposed Solution: Now and only now! - authors may outline the contribution of the manuscript. Here authors have to make sure readers point out what are the novel aspects of authors work. Authors should place the paper in proper context by citing relevant papers. At least, 5 references (recently journal articles) are used in this section.
  1. Method section: the presentation of the experimental methods should be clear and complete in every detail facilitating reproducibility by other scientists.
  2. Results and discussion section: The presentation of results should be simple and straightforward in style. This section report the most important findings, including results of statistical analyses as appropriate and comparisons to other research results. Results given in figures should not be repeated in tables. This is where the author(s) should explain in words what he/she/they discovered in the research. It should be clearly laid out and in a logical sequence. This section should be supported suitable references.
  3. Conclusion section: Summarize sentences the primary outcomes of the study in a paragraph. Are the claims in this section supported by the results, do they seem reasonable? Have the authors indicated how the results relate to expectations and to earlier research? Does the article support or contradict previous theories? Does the conclusion explain how the research has moved the body of scientific knowledge forward?
  4. Language. If an article is poorly written due to grammatical errors, while it may make it more difficult to understand the science.
  5. Please be sure that the manuscript is up to date. It is expected that 10 to 20%  of references are to recent papers.
  6. Is the manuscript clearly written?  Is the article exciting? Does the content flow well from one section to another? Please try to keep your manuscript on the proper level.  It should be easy to understand by well qualified professionals, but at the same time please avoid describing well known facts (use proper references instead). Often manuscripts receive negative reviews because reviewers are not able to understand the manuscript and this is authors' (not reviewers') fault.  Notice, that if reviewers have difficulties, then other readers will face the same problem and there is no reason to publish the manuscript.
  7. Do you have enough references?  We will usually expect a minimum of 10 to 25 references primarily to journal papers, depending on the length of the paper. Citations of textbooks should be used very rarely and citations to web pages should be avoided. All cited papers should be referenced within the text of the manuscript.
  8. Figures and Tables. Relation of Tables or Figures and Text: Because tables and figures supplement the text, all tables and figures should be referenced in the text. Authors also must explain what the reader should look for when using the table or figure. Focus only on the important point the reader should draw from them, and leave the details for the readers to examine on their own.



Figures:
a.    All figures appearing in article must be numbered in the order that they appear in the text.
b.    Each figure must have a caption fully explaining the content

c.    Figure captions are presented as a paragraph starting with the figure number i.e. Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.
d.    Figure captions appear below the figure
e.    Each figure must be fully cited if taken from another article
f.    all figures must be referred to in the body of the article

Tables:
a.    Material that is tabular in nature must appear in a numbered captioned table.
b.    All tables appearing in article must be numbered in the order that they appear in the text.
c.    Each table must have a caption fully explaining the content with the table number  i.e. Table 1, Table 2, etc.
d.    Each column must have a clear and concise heading
e.    Tables are to be presented with single horizontal line under: the table caption, the column headings and at the end of the table.
f.    All tables must be referred to in the body of the article
g.    Each table must be fully cited if taken from another article

  1. Each citation should be written in the order of appearance in the text. Citations and references must sequential
  2. Please be aware that for the final submission of regular paper you will be asked to tailor your paper so the last page is not half empty.

 

 

Journal Subscription

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE

1. Please read our subscription rate for reffered period of time below:

Products

Subscribe

Java, Bali

Sumatra, Kalimantan,, Sulawesi, NTB, NTT, Papua

Overseas

Printed 1 year

2 issues

IDR 300.000

IDR 350.000

USD 35

 

*The price above includes the shipment cost

2. Complete the subscription form to order an individual subscription to the print of the Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. The Journal is published twice a year, and subscriptions run on a calendar year.

3. Please transfer your payment to:

Account number: BNI  0115953169

Account name: Saila Makwatul Amrina

4. Send your subscription form and the proof of the payment through email at journal_jptk@uny.ac.id. Once we receive your payment, it can take 1-3 business days to process your subscription.


 

Retraction

The papers published in Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (JPTK) will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.