Developing formative authentic assessment instruments based on learning trajectory for elementary school

Authors

  • Anesa Surya Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University
  • Aman Aman Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.6540

Keywords:

instruments of authentic assessment, formative assessment, thematic-integrative, learning trajectory

Abstract

This research aims to (1) develop research formative authentic assessment instruments based on learning trajectory that is eligible for the fourth grade students of elementary schools; and (2) develop formative authentic assessment instruments based on learning trajectory that is effective for the fourth grade students of elementary schools. This developmental study refers to the model developed by Borg & Gall. The developmental design was grouped into four development procedures, consisting of: (a) Exploration, (b) development of the draft/prototype, (c) product testing and revisions, and (d) final validation. The experimental subjects are some pilot project elementary schools which used Curriculum 2013 in Ngawi Regency. The data were collected using interview guides, documentation, assessment sheets of the product instrument of authentic assessment, observation sheets of the students, achievement test, questionnaire responses of teachers and students. The data of the instrument reliability were analyzed in terms of item discrimination and item difficulty, and the agreement index was employed for the reliability of the instrument. The research finding reveals that the research instrument in terms of attitude assessment, assessment of knowledge and skills according to subject-matter experts and experts in evaluation is categorized as "˜very good'. The results of the item discrimination analysis show that nonnegative and item difficulties  range from easy to hard. The formative authentic assessment instruments are categorized as "˜reliable' by the agreement index of ≥ 0.75.

Author Biographies

Anesa Surya, Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University

Anesa Surya was born in Ngawi on April 20, 1990. She completed her bachelor's degree in 2012 in the Faculty of Teacher Education and Educational Sciences of Sebelas Maret University, majoring in Elementary School Teacher Education study program. She completed her master degree in 2015 in the Graduate School of Yogyakarta State University in the same major. She currently works as a lecturer in the department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Aman Aman, Yogyakarta State University

Aman was born in Brebes on October 15, 1974. He completed his bachelor's degree in 1999 in Yogyakarta State University, majoring in History Education study program. He completed his master degree in 2002 in the Graduate School of Jakarta State University. He got his doctorate in 2011 in the Graduate School of Yogyakarta State University, majoring in Educational Research and Evaluation. He currently works as a lecturer in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Graduate School of Yogyakarta State University.

References

Arifin, Z. (2011). Evaluasi pembelajaran [Learning evaluation]. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur pengembangan [Developmental Procedure]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Clements, D.H. & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The Learning Trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fogarty, R. (2009). How to integrate the curricula. Palatine, IL: Skylight.

Frisbie, D.A. (2005). Measurement 101: Some fundamentals revisited educational measurement: Issues and practice. Fall, 24(38), 21-28.

Glatthorn, A., & Jailall, M. (2009). The principal as curriculum leader shaping what is taught and tested (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Gronlund, N.E., Linn, R.L., & Miller, M.D. (2009). Measurement and teaching (10th ed.). Upper Sadle River, NJ: Merril.

Guliker, J.T.M., Bastiaens, T.J., & Kirschner, P.A. (2004). A five dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Edu-cational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21 [Scientific and contextual approaches in the 21st century learning]. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Johnson, D. & Johnson R. (2002). Meaningful assessment: A management and cooperative process. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2010). Educational and measurement: Classroom application and practice (9rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Willey & Sons.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) [Authentic assessment (Assessment of learning participants' learning results based on Curriculum 2013)]. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Kusuma, D., Triatna, C., & Permana, J. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter [Character education]. Yogyakarta: Diandra.

Liu, M.C. & Wang, J.Y. (2010). Investigating knowledge integration in web-based thematic learning using. Journal of International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS), 13, 25-39.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes [Test and non-test instrument arrangement techniques]. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia.

Miller, P.W. (2008). Measurement and teaching. Munster, IN: Patrick W. Miller and Associates.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 untuk sekolah dasar (SD)/ madrasah ibtidaiyah (MI) [Curriculum 2013 for elementary schools/ madrasah ibtidaiyah]. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Mulyana, T. (2012). Pengembangan bahan ajar melalui desain penelitian [The development of lesson material through research design]. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 2, 21-28.

Newman, F.M., King, M.B., & Charmichael, D.L. (2007). Authentic instructional and assessment. Des Moines, IA: Grimes State of Office Building.

O'Neil, J. (1992). Outting performance assessment to the test. Educational Leadership, 49, 14-19.

Riduwan. (2013). Skala-skala pengukuran variabel [Variable measuring scales]. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Rusman. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran [Learning models]. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Schunk, H.D. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student classroom assessment. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Subali, B. (2012). Prinsip assessmen dan evaluasi pembelajaran [Principle of assessment and learning evaluation]. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Sukmadinata, N.S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan [Educational research method]. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Team of Curriculum of Professional Basic Subjects and Learning Development. (2011). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran [Curriculum and learning]. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Team of Educational Research Center. (2010). Analisis soal secara manual [Problem analysis manually]. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendiknas.

Van den Akker, J. (2006). Educational design research. Macmilan: Routledge.

Webb, P. & Pearson, P. (2012). Create unit and lesson planning through a thematic/integrated to teaching games for understanding (TGFU). The Journal Physical Education, 45, 17-22.

Wittek, L. (2013). The activity of writting for learning in a nursing program: Trajectories of meaning making. Sociology Journal, 14, 73-94.

Wright, R.J. (2008). Educational assessment test measurement in the age of accountability. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Zakaria, T.R. (2010). Pedoman penilaian sikap [Attitude assessment guidance]. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendiknas.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Surya, A., & Aman, A. (2016). Developing formative authentic assessment instruments based on learning trajectory for elementary school. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.6540

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): June

Section

Articles

License

The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education). However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.

The copyright transfer agreement form can be downloaded here: [REiD Copyright Transfer Agreement Form] 


The copyright form should be signed originally and sent to the Editorial Office through email to reid.ppsuny@uny.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License
REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education) by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.