Keefektifan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi, metode, dan sikap matematis

Ahmad Nasrullah; Marsigit Marsigit

doi:10.21831/pg.v11i2.11180

Keefektifan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi, metode, dan sikap matematis

Ahmad Nasrullah, , Indonesia
Marsigit Marsigit, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v11i2.11180

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, dan sikap matematis siswa SMA. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain Nonequivalent (Pretest and Posttest) group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sakra Lombok Timur yang terdiri dari tujuh kelas. Dari tujuh kelas tersebut, dipilih secara acak dua kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagai berikut. 1). Pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, dan sikap matematis siswa SMA. 2). Ada perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketiga variabel dependen secara simultan. 3). Pendekatan problem solving lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan pendekatan problem posingditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar dan kemampuan metode matematis. 4). Tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan kedua pendekatan pembelajaran ditinjau dari sikap matematis siswa SMA.

Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, problem solving, ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, sikap matematis siswa.

The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving in terms of basic competence attainment, mathematical method, and mathematical attitude

Abstract

This study aims to describe and compare the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approaches in terms of mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method, and mathematical attitude of senior high school students. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the nonequivalent pretest and posttest group design. The population was the X grade students of State Senior High School 1 of Sakra Lombok Timur that consisted of seven classes. The sample was two classes selected randomly from all Year X classes. The results of the study are as follows. 1) Problem posing and problem solving approaches are effective in terms of the mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method and mathematical attitude of Senior Hogh School students. 2) There is a different effect of problem posing and problem solving approaches on all dependent variables simultaneously. 3) Problem solving approach is more effective than problem posing in terms of the basic competence attainment and mathematical method. 4) There is no different effect of problem posing and problem solving approaches in terms of student mathematical attitude.

Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method, mathematical attitude.

Keywords

pendekatan problem posing; problem solving; ketercapaian kompetensi dasar; metode matematis; sikap matematis siswa

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Christou, C. et al. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes. ZDM 2005 Volume 37 (3).

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (third edition). (Terjemahan Ahmad Fawaid & Khoirul Anam). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ebel, R. I. & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essencial of educational measurement. (4th ed) New Jersey: Prentice-Hell, Inc.

Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concept in teaching primary mathematics. California: SAGE Publication.

Johnson, E. B. (2007). Contextual teaching and learning. (Terjemahan Ibnu Setiawan). Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.

Johnson, R.A. & Wichern, D.W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Katagiri, S. (2007). Mathematical thinking and how to teach it. Diambil tanggal 10 November 2012, dari http://home.kku.ac.th/crme/APEC/PDF%202004

Kemendiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang RI nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Kemendiknas. (2005). Peranturan Pemerintah no 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Kemendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 22, Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.

Khalid, M. (2007). Incorporating mathematical thinking in addition and subtraction of fraction: Real issues and challenges. Diambil tanggal 10 November 2012 dari http://www.crme.kku.ac.th/APEC/PDF%202007/Madihah%20 Khalid.pdf

Lavy, I. & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. Makalah disajikan pada Proceedings of the 31th Conference of The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, di Oranim Academic College of Education

Marsigit. (2007). Mathematical thinking across multilateral culture. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Marsigit. (Desember 2009). Pembudayaan matematika di sekolah untuk mencapai keunggulan bangsa. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Marsigit. (Juli 2011). Developing the attitude and creativity in mathematics education. Makalah disajikan dalam The International and The Fourth National Conference on Mathematics, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Paul Suparno. (1997). Filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Paul Suparno, Rohandi, Sukadi, Kartono. (2002). Reformasi pendidikan, sebuah rekomendasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Silver, E.A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematics problem solving and problem posing. Diambil pada tanggal 2 Agustus 2012, dari http:/www.emis.de

Stacey, K. (2007). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important?. Center for Research on International in Educational Development. University of Tsukuba.

Steven, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed). New York & London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Suryosubroto. (2009). Proses belajar mengajar di sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Wina Sanjaya. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Yuniati, S. (2010). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematik siswa sekolah menengah pertama dengan pembelajaran problem posing. Tesis Magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.11180