E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY LEVEL ANALYSIS (STUDY ON 35 GOVERNMENT WEBSITES IN CENTRAL JAVA)

Hendrawan Bintang Surya; Rino Ardhian Nugroho

doi:10.21831/natapraja.v10i1.49072

E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY LEVEL ANALYSIS (STUDY ON 35 GOVERNMENT WEBSITES IN CENTRAL JAVA)

Hendrawan Bintang Surya, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Rino Ardhian Nugroho, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/natapraja.v10i1.49072

Abstract

This study examines maturity level of E-Government in 35 websites government in Province Central Java. The reason for choosing the location of Central Java Province is the province has a high ICT Development Index (IP-TIK) but not in line with the high Indonesian e-government rating either. So that measuring the maturity of websites in all 35 cities in Central Java Province is important so that these regions make improvements This study uses a government maturity model, there are 5 variabels: Simple Information, Two-way Communication, Service and Financial Transaction, Integration and Political Participation. This study method uses a quantitative approach. Then, This study uses descriptive statistical analysis techniques. The result of this study is 35 websites government in Province Central Java has a level of immature maturity model. With details that of the five variables, 2 of them have a very low level of maturity and 1 of them has a medium maturity level.

Keywords

E-Government, maturity level, website

Full Text:

PDF

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Perkembangan Indeks Pembangunan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (IP-TIK). 102, 1–8. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2017/12/15/1310/indeks-pembangunan-teknologi-informasi-dan-komunikasi--ip-tik--indonesia-tahun-2016-sebesar-4-34-pada-skala-0---10-.html

Bank, W. (2002). The E-Government Hanbook for Developing Nations Advisory Board. November, 41.

Bungin, B. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Chernovita, H. P., & Setiyawati, N. (2018). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Aspirasi Masyarakat Kota Salatiga Sebagai Instrumen Pendekatan Open Government. 3, 1–14.

Diana, D., & Veronika, N. D. M. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Website Provinsi Bengkulu Menggunakan Metode Webqual 4.0. Pseudocode, 5 (1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.33369/pseudocode.5.1.10-17

Djaali, & Muljono, P. (2000). Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Fietkiewicz, K. J., Mainka, A., & Stock, W. G. (2017). An empirical investigation of Smart Cities’ governmental websites. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.016.08.003

Haryani, P. (2016). Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan E-Government Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Dengan Metode E-GOVQUAL Modifikasi. Simposium Nasional RAPI XV, 379–386.

Indoensia, D. e-G. K. K. dan I. R. (2012). Dimensi Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia. https://pegi.layanan.go.id/tentang-pegi/dimensi-pemeringkatan-e-government-indonesia/

Indoensia, D. e-G. K. K. dan I. R. (2017). Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI). https://pegi.layanan.go.id/2017/01/infografis-pemeringkatan-e-government-indonesia/infografis-pegi-2012-2014/

Indrajid, R. (2009). Electronic Government. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18 (2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1

Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.

Suaedi, F., & Wardiyanto, B. (2010). Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara : Reformasi Birokrasi Dan E-Governance (1st ed.). Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). CV. Alfabeta.

Sulistyo, D., Negara, H. P., & W., Y. F. A. (2008). Analisis Kajian Standarisasi Isi Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten / Kota. 55–62.

Sumirah, & Zohri, M. (2016). Integrasi Data Dalam Proses Layanan Publik. 1(1).

Susetyo, B. (2011). Menyusun Tes Hasil Belajar. CV. Cakra.

Varma, S. (2006). Preliminary item statistics using point-biserial correlation and p-values. Educational Data Systems. 1–7.

Widowati, D. P. D. (2018). Survei PBB 2018: Peringkat E-Government Indonesia. BPPTIK Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika. https://bpptik.kominfo.go.id/2018/08/23/5938/survei-pbb-2018-peringkat-e-government-indonesia/

Yulandina, A., Antoni, C., & Firmanda, A. (2018). Optimalisasi Unsur Live Shoot Dan Motion Graphic Untuk Promosi Digital Lembaga Paud. Journal of Digital Education, Communication, and Arts (Deca), 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30871/deca.v1i1.588

Yunas, N. S. (2018). Desain Kebijakan Reformasi Sistem Perpajakan Melalui E-Taxation di Indonesia: Belajar Pada Keberhasilan Reformasi Sistem Perpajakan di Jepang. Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4, 71–89. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/cosmogov/article/view/15903/pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/natapraja.v10i1.49072