Autonomous learning materials of structure and written expression for TOEFL preparation

Aung Si Thu, Ministry of Religious Affairs and Culture Myanmar, Myanmar

Abstract


The aim of this study was to develop appropriate autonomous learning materials of structure and written expression of TOEFL preparation for autonomous learners for the Centre for Language and Development of Yogyakarta State University based on the learning needs and target needs of the autonomous learners. The research was an educational research and development (R&D) adapting ADDIE model (Branch, 2009). Two instruments (questionnaire and test) for needs analysis and two instruments for validation were used. The data from the needs analysis and the material validation were analyzed quantitatively through descriptive statistics. The research findings revealed that the autonomous learning materials were appropriate in terms of input, learning activities, layout, design and organization. The learners’ role is to learn the materials individually and teacher's role is to be a guide and cooperator. All of the learning activities include reading of explanations of forms and functions, doing practices for forms and functions, multiple choice, and doing reflection. Every unit has the following organizing unit title, instructions for learners, grammatical form and functions, activities of forms, functions, and TOEFL tests items, online activities for further learning, learning essentials, reflection, self-test (TOEFL) and answer keys.


Keywords


autonomous learning; materials; learning TOEFL preparation

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Boulet, J. R., van Zanten, M., McKinley, D. W., & Gary, N. E. (2001). Evaluating the spoken English proficiency of graduates of foreign medical schools. Medical Education, 35(8), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00998.x

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, N.Y.: Springer Science & Business Media.

Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the present-day advantages of informal, out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.007

Cook, V. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Macmillan.

Cooker, L., & Pemberton, R. (2010). Self-access language learning in museums: A materials development project. SiSAL Journal, 1(2), 87–99. Retrieved from http://sisaljournal.org/archives/sep10/cooker_pemberton

Gardner, D. P. (2011). Fostering autonomy in language learning. Zirve University.

Hosie, P., Schibeci, R., & Backhaus, A. (2005). A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500187097

Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner autonomy in the Indonesian EFL settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4847

Luo, Y., & Xu, W. (2019). A review on the professional development of elementary education teachers in China. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i2.56

Mahmud, M. (2014). The EFL students’ problems in answering the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): a study in Indonesian context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2581.

Najeeb, S. S. R. (2013). Learner autonomy in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.183

Nordquist, R. (2011). Grammar in English definition and examples glossary of grammatical and rhetorical terms. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-grammar-1690909 retrieved Dec 18, 2016

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667336

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests. London: Longman.

Prince Edward Island. (2008). Evaluation and selection of learning resource. Education and Early Childhood Development.

Purpura, J. E. (2013). Assessing grammar. In The Companion to Language Assessment (pp. 100–124). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla147

Saryati, T., & Yulia, Y. (2019). Contextual teaching and learning approach to supplementary reading materials based on 2013 Curriculum. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v2i1.3703

Shangarffam, N., & Ghazi Saeedi, F. (2013). The relationship among EFL learners’ autonomy, first language essay writing tasks and second language essay writing tasks in task/content based language instruction. Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, System, 5, 177–191.

Tian, D., & Chunlei, X. (2005). Fostering learner autonomy in English language classroom. CELEA Jour, 28(3), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.491

Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. Bloomsbury Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v6i1.15919

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Aung Si Thu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Our Journal indexed by:

     


 Creative Commons License
LingTera is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/ljtp.

View My Stats