The Analysis of S.T.E.M Education Lesson Plan in Curriculum 2013

A. Rahmaniar; S. Purnamasari; D. Abdurrahman; D. Setyawarno; H. A. Mahmoud

doi:10.21831/jser.v8i2.71716

The Analysis of S.T.E.M Education Lesson Plan in Curriculum 2013

A. Rahmaniar, Universitas Garut, Indonesia
S. Purnamasari, Universitas Garut, Indonesia
D. Abdurrahman, Universitas Garut, Indonesia
D. Setyawarno, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
H. A. Mahmoud, Helwan University, Egypt

10.21831/jser.v8i2.71716

Abstract

The integration of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education is essential to develop students' abilities, such as creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication. Teachers should create a lesson plan that integrates STEM education to implement STEM Education into the learning process. The purpose of this research is to analyze the lesson plans from preservice teachers in science education programs and establish a standardized lesson plan that integrates STEM Education. The method used descriptive analysis that describes the characteristics of STEM Education lesson plans using a rubric, adapted from another journal. The rubric has 20 indicators to analyze the lesson plans, with four levels - no evidence of, inadequate, needs improvement, and adequate. Most of the lesson plans met the standard but still require improvement and development. For the identity section, 50% of the lesson plans needed improvement. For the learning process, more than 50% of the lesson plans required improvement, but they were adequate for scientific activities. For the assessment and resources section, there was an equal distribution of lesson plans that needed improvement and adequate level. However, up to 70% of the lesson plans were on an adequate level for using a different media in the learning process.

Keywords

STEM Education, Lesson Plan, Rubric

Full Text:

PDF

References

Brown, J. (2011). The Impact of Student Created Slowmation On The Teaching And Learning Of Primary Science. 1–146. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1437&context=theses

Carr, R. L., & Strobel, J. (2011). Integrating Engineering Design Challenges into Secondary STEM Education. White Papers: Building a Framework for Engineering Design Experiences in STEM, 14–20.

Davidi, E. I. N., Sennen, E., & Supardi, K. (2021). Integrasi Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Enggeenering and Mathematic) Untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2021.v11.i1.p11-22

Dewi Sartika. (2019). Jurnal Ilmu Sosail dan Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 89–93.

Edy Susanto, M. (2019). Permendikbud No 22 Tahun 2016. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Fauziaturromah, Y., Rahman, T., & Mulyana, E. H. (2021). Fauziaturromah, Y., Rahman, T., & Mulyana, E. H. (2021).

Pengembangan Rencana Pembelajaran Model Pembelajaran STEM Untuk Kelompok B Sub Tema Benda-Benda Alam. Jurnal PAUD Agapedia, 5(2), 176–183. Desember, 5(2), 176–183.

Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271.

Indonesia, K. P. dan K. R. (2019). Surat Edaran Nomor 14 tahun 2019 tentang Penyederhanaan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran.

Isnaini, M., Farwati, R., & Metafisika, K. (2021). CATUR STEM: Buku Panduan bagi Guru Kimia untuk Menyusun RPP Berbasis STEM Muhammad. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 5(1), 1–12. file:///D:/Sri Mulyanti/riset/artkel orbital.pdf

Karmila, K., & Putra, D. P. (2022). Pengaruh Pembelajaran STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics) Pada Materi Fluida Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Literasi Digital, 2(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.54065/jld.2.1.2022.115.

Latip, A., Abdurrahman, D., Rahmaniar, A., Purnamasari, S., Lestari, W. Y., Nurfadilah, V. A., & Fauziah, S. R. (2023). Training on the Development of Science Learning Tools with STEM Approach for Science Teachers in Garut Regency [Pelatihan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Dengan Pendekatan STEM Untuk Guru IPA di Kabupaten Garut]. J. Pengabdian Isola, 2(1), 1–7. http://ejournal.upi.edu/jpi

Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, March, 1–40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573325

Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Masek, A., Sudira, P., & Samsudin, A. (2021). Crucial problems in arranged the lesson plan of vocational teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20604

Nurwidodo, N., Romdaniyah, S. W., Sudarmanto, S., & Husamah, H. (2022). Pembinaan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Pembelajaran STEM dengan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif dan Keterampilan Kolaboratif pada Siswa SMP Coaching Teachers in Implementing STEM Learning with Creative Thinking and Collaborative Skills for Junior High School Studen. Jurnal Abdimas (Journal of Community Service): Sasambo, 4(1), 1–12.

OECD. (2023). 2.4.3 PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During - and From - Disruption: Vol. II. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-ii_a97db61c-en

Parno, P., Edi Supriana, Arif Hidayat, Bakhrul Rizky Kurniawan, Try Nada Fis, & Farah Rafidah6. (2023). Pelatihan Pengembangan Rpp Untuk Pjbl-Stem-Asesmen Formatif Berorientasi Literasi Sains Bagi Guru Ipa Smpn Se-Kota Malang. J-ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(6), 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.53625/jabdi.v3i6.6756

Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.

Rahmaniar, A. (2020). Perceptions of the Indonesia National Curriculum in Relation To Integrated Stem Education At the High School Level. 1–99.

Rahmaniar, A. (2021). The Utilization of the Valid Rubric to Improve High School Students’ Real-world Problem-solving Skills in STEM Education. Icaess 2020, 379–385. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010357203790385

Suwarma, I. R., & Kumano, Y. (2019). Implementation of STEM education in Indonesia: Teachers’ perception of STEM integration into curriculum. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052052.

Winangun, M. M., & Fauziah, D. (2019). Designing lesson plan of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) education in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012024.

Winaya. (2015). Analisis Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Menurut Kurikulum 2013 kelas IV SD No. 4 Banyuasri. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v3i1.5730.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v8i2.71716