Analysis of the Implementation of Science Learning based on Teachers' Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Capabilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v8i1.70762

Keywords:

Global Warming, Pedagogy, TPACK, Technolgy, Teachers

Abstract

Teachers play a crucial role in facilitating students' understanding and making science material more accessible. To achieve this, educators must possess the capability to use technology, select appropriate learning models, and possess sufficient knowledge of the material - collectively termed as Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Therefore, this research aimed to analyze the implementation of science learning based on the teacher's TPACK ability level. The qualitative descriptive research method was employed, involving three science teachers selected through convenience sampling and identified as Teacher A, Teacher B, and Teacher C. TPACK ability data was obtained using a TPACK measurement questionnaire developed by Shmidt et al., (2009) with a total of 54 statement items with three general dimensions. They are Technological Knowledge (TK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), and Content Knowledge (CK). The analysis involved observing each teacher during science lessons evaluating the alignment of planning and implementation through an observation sheet. The results of the analysis show that teachers with high TPACK abilities also have more complex science learning in terms of material, method, and technology selection. The results of this research can be used as a reference for teachers in designing and applying learning, especially in terms of integrating technology into science learning.


References

Anisa, V. M., & Astriani, D. (2022). Implementation of PhET simulation with discovery learning model to improve understanding of dynamic electricity concepts. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3438

Anita, A., & Novianty, F. (2020). The Students' Characters Analysis in Physics Learning Process. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06108

Breukelen, D. H. J., Vries, M. J., & Schure, F. A. (2017). Concept learning by direct current design challenges in secondary education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9357-0

Choi, B., & Young, M. F. (2021). TPACK-L: teachers' pedagogical design thinking for the wise integration of technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1906312

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of "hands-on" and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488

Gellerstedt, M., Babaheidari, S. M., & Svensson, L. (2018). A first step towards a model for teachers' adoption of ICT pedagogy in schools. Heliyon, 4(9), e00786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00786

Hapsari, N., Abidin, Z., & Arip, A. G. (2022). Analisis Faktor Jenis Kelamin, Usia dan Lama Bekerja Terhadap Kemampuan TPACK Guru IPA SMP di Kota Cirebon. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi,

(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v14i2.4942

Higgins, J., Moeed, A., & Eden, R. (2018). Video as a mediating artefact of science learning: Cogenerated views of what helps students learn from watching video. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0022-7

Hossain, S. F. A., Nurunnabi, M., & Hussain, K. (2021). Continuous mobile devices usage tendency in the TPACK-based classroom and academic performance of university students. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1933160

Huang, K. Y., Chen, Y. H., & Jang, S. J. (2022). TPACK in Special Education Schools for SVI: A Comparative Study between Taiwanese and Chinese In-service Teachers. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(2), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1717450

Johan, H., Suhandi, A., Wulan, A. R., & Herawati, A. (2018). Enhancing Mastery Of Earth Science Concept Of Prospective Physics Teachers Through Interactive Conceptual Instruction Supported By Visualization And Grads. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.9799

Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, H. (2023). Improving student teachers' TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 49(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610

Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9376-7

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge : A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Lawrence, M. G., Williams, S., Nanz, P., & Renn, O. (2022). Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth, 5(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010

Long, T., Zhao, G., Li, X., Zhao, R., Xie, K., & Duan, Y. (2022). Exploring Chinese in-service primary teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for the use of thinking tools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1812514

Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x

McFarland, D. A., Khanna, S., Domingue, B. W., & Pardos, Z. A. (2021). Education Data Science: Past, Present, Future. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211052055

Musharrat, T. (2020). Teachers' Perceptions About Use and Challenges of Hands-on Activities in Secondary Science Classroom. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(12), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i12.3384

Nagaraj, Sultan, A., & Sukumar, A. (2022). Hands-on and Minds-on Learning of School Children in Zoology Museum. International Journal of Recent Research in Life Sciences, 9(2), 28–34.

Nevrita, N., Asikin, N., & Amelia, T. (2020). Analisis Kompetensi TPACK pada Media Pembelajaran Guru Biologi SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.16709

Ocak, C., & Baran, E. (2019). Observing the Indicators of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Classrooms: Video-Based Research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1550627

Samsudin, A., Andi Suhandi, Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I., & Costu, B. (2017). Promoting Conceptual Understanding on Magnetic Field Concept through Interactive Conceptual Instruction ( ICI ) with PDEODE * E Tasks. Advance Science Letters, 23(1205–1210). https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7539

Scott, K. C., & Nimon, K. (2020). Construct validity of data from a TPACK self-assessment instrument in 2-year public college faculty in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1790444

Sembiring, R. B. (2022). Kemampuan Tpack Yang Wajib Dimiliki Oleh Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sekolah. SKYLANDSEA PROFESIONAL Jurnal Ekonomi ..., 2(2), 81–84. https://jurnal.yappsu.org/index.php/skylandsea/article/view/95%0Ahttps://jurnal.yappsu.org/index.php/skylandsea/article/download/95/100

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science Pratical Work and Its Impact on Students Science Achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.888

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Suastra, I. W., Rapi, N. K., Yasa, P., & Arjana, I. G. (2021). Elaborating Indigenous Science Content into Science Learning Process: A New Science Instructional Model to Develop Students' Local Wisdom-Based Characters and Higher Order Thinking Skills. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(3), 516.

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.31176

Suyamto, J., Masykuri, M., & Sarwanto, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Tpack (Technolgical, Pedagogical, and Content, Knowledge) Guru Biologi Sma Dalam Menyusun Perangkat Pembelajaran Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41381

Thohir, M. A., Jumadi, J., & Warsono, W. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service science teachers: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1814908

Wahyono, Abdullah, I., & Rusman. (2017). Implementation of scientific approach based learning to think high levels in state senior high school in Ketapang. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(8), 221–230.

Xiong, X. B., Ching Sing, C., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2022). Exploring the relationship between Chinese pre-service teachers' epistemic beliefs and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Studies, 48(6), 750–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814698

Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, Y. (2021). A study of K-12 teachers' TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1627560

Yanti, M., & Yusnaini, Y. (2018). The Narration of Digital Literacy Movement in Indonesia. Informasi: Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 48(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v48i2.21148

Yildiz Durak, H. (2021). Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers' TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1136–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.161959

Downloads

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

Yanti, M., Rahayu, D. P., & Rabbani, A. (2024). Analysis of the Implementation of Science Learning based on Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Capabilities. Journal of Science Education Research, 8(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v8i1.70762

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): J. Sc. Edu. Research

Section

Articles

License

Journal of Science Education Research allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  1. Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  2. Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal