Keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari motivasi dan kemandirian belajar

Atin Argianti; Sri Andayani

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.35263

Keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari motivasi dan kemandirian belajar

Atin Argianti, Program Studi S2 Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sri Andayani, Program Studi Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.35263

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha ditinjau dari motivasi dan kemandirian belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan populasi seluruh siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Negeri di Pati, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Sampel penelitian ini adalah siswa di satu kelas VIII yang dibagi menjadi 2, yaitu kelas eksperimen (kelompok siswa bernomor absen ganjil) dan kelas kontrol (kelompok siswa bernomor absen genap) dengan banyaknya siswa berturut-turut 16 dan 15 siswa. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan angket motivasi dan kemandirian belajar. Analisis data menggunakan uji t untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha ditinjau dari masing-masing variabel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha efektif ditinjau dari motivasi, dan (2) pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha efektif ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar. Hasil analisis keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha ditinjau dari motivasi ditunjukkan dari nilai t variabel motivasi adalah 4,258 dan nilai signifikan motivasi setelah perlakuan adalah 0,001 kurang dari 0,05. Keefektifan pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar dibuktikan dari nilai t variabel kemandirian adalah 5,030 dan nilai signifikannya 0,000 kurang dari 0,05.

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the effectiveness of Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach in terms of motivation and self-regulated learning. This study was quasi-experimental research. The population were all grade VIII students of a State Junior High School in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. The sample were students of a class in grade VIII, which is divided into two groups, namely the experimental group (odd-numbered students) and the control group (even-numbered students) with 16 and 15 participating students respectively. The data were collected using questionnaires on motivation and self-regulated learning. The data were analyzed using the t-test to describe the effectiveness of Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach. The result shows that: (1) the Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach is effective in improving motivation; and (2) the Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach is effective in improving self-regulated learning. The results of the analysis of the Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach is effective in terms of motivation with a score of 4.258 and with the significance value of motivation after treatment being 0.001, which is less than 0.05. The Wolfram Alpha-assisted STEM approach is effective in terms of self-regulated learning with a score of 5.030 and with the significance value of 0.000, which is less than 0.05.

Keywords

Kemandirian belajar; motivasi; pendekatan STEM berbantuan Wolfram Alpha

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561

Asmaranti, W., & Andayani, S. (2018). Mengapa media berbasis komputer dalam pembelajaran matematika penting? Perspektif guru dan siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 6(2), 146–157. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms/article/view/23958

Bell, J., & Bell, T. (2018). Integrating computational thinking with a music education context. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.09

Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education. NSTA Press.

Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4

Cho, M.-H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z

Eom, S. (2015). The Effects of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies on student’ s perceived e-learning outcomes and satisfaction. Proceedings of the AIS SIG-ED IAIM 2015 Conference. http://aisel.aisnet.org/siged2015/12

Ersoy, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2014). Cognitive and affective implications of persuasive technology use on mathematics instruction. Computers & Education, 75, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.009

Fahuzan, K., & Santosa, R. H. (2018). Gender differences in motivation to learn math using role play game in smartphone. Journal of Physics, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012130

Fauzi, A., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2018). Self-regulated learning: the effect on student’s mathematics achievement. ICRIEMS 5, 1097(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012139

Gustiani, I., Widodo, A., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Development and validation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) based instructional material. Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education (MSCEIS 2016), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983969

Han, S. (2017). Korean students’ attitudes toward STEM project-based learning and major selection. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(2), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0264

Hands, A. (2012). Wolfram|Alpha http://www.wolframalpha.com. Technical Services Quarterly, 29(2), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2012.651027

Hastings, C., Mischo, K., & Morrison, M. (2015). Hands-on start to wolfram mathematica: And programming with the wolfram language. In WolframMedia.

Hora, M. T., & Oleson, A. K. (2017). Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6

Jauhariyyah, F. R., Suwono, H., & Ibrohim. (2017). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project based learning (STEM-PjBL) pada Pembelajaran Sains. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2, 432–436. http://tiny.cc/p4jjlz

Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4–8. In STEM by Design: Strategies and Activities for Grades 4-8. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679976

Kärkkäinen, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Sparking Innovation in STEM Education with Technology and Collaboration: A Case Study of the HP Catalyst Initiative. OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k480sj9k442-en

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kemendikbud. (2018a). Permendikbud Nomor 23 tahun 2018 Tentang Standar Penilaian. Kemendikbud. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.030

Kemendikbud. (2018b). Permendikbud Nomor 35 Tahun 2018 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Kemendikbud.

Khoiriyah, N., Abdurrahman, & Wahyudi, I. (2018). Implementasi pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi gelombang bunyi. JRKPF UAD, 5(2), 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v5i2.9977

Koca, F. (2016). Motivation to learn and teacher-student relationship. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 6(2), 1–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1135209.pdf

LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and Student interest in stem careers: The Roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092

Larson, M. (2017). Math education is STEM education! NCTM president’s message. https://www.nctm.org/News-and-Calendar/Messages-from-the-President/Archive/Matt-Larson/MathEducation-Is-STEM-Education!/

León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017

Maryland State Department of Education. (2012). Maryland State STEM Standard of Practice. The Maryland State Board of Education.

McCoy, L. (1996). Computer based mathematics learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 438–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1996.10782177

Mias, G. (2018). Mathematica for bioinformatics. In statistics in: Mathematica for bioinformatics (pp. 1–384). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72377-8

Milaturrahmah, N., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). Mathematics learning process with science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) approach in Indonesia. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 895(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012030

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Nanang. (2013). Wolfram-Alpha pada teori bilangan. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, November, 51–58.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.

Nite, S. B., Margaret, M., Capraro, R. M., Morgan, J., & Peterson, C. A. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A longitudinal examination of secondary school intervention. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044214

Ong, E. T., Ayob, A., Ibrahim, M. N., Adnan, M., Shariff, J., & Ishak, N. (2016). The effectiveness of an in-service training of early childhood teachers on stem integration through Project-Based Inquiry Learning (PIL). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special issue), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10170a

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250699716

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Tarmizi, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., Abu Bakar, K., & Yunus, A. S. M. (2008). Learning mathematics through utilization of technology: use of autograph technology vs handheld graphing calculator. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, 71–76. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2008/venice/edu/edu12.pdf

Voskoglou, M. G., & Buckley, S. (2012). Problem solving and computational thinking in a learning environment. Egyptian Computer Science Journal ,ECS, 36(4), 28–46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233824384

Wheatley, C. L. (1980). Calculator use and problem-solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/749058

Wolfram, S. (2003). The mathematica book (5th ed.). Wolfram Media.

Wong, R., & Wong, R. (2017). Alignment of motivational strategies: The perceptions of teachers and students. Educational Practice and Theory, 39(2), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/39.2.05

Yates, S. M. (2002). The influence of optimism and pessimism on student achievement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217113

Zheng, J., Xing, W., Zhu, G., Chen, G., Zhao, H., & Xie, C. (2019). Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers & Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103669

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.35263