Level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif

Nur Eva Zakiah

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458

Level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif

Nur Eva Zakiah, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Galuh Ciamis, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mendeskripsikan level kemampuan metakognitif siswa berdasarkan gaya kognitif (Field Dependent or FD dan Field Independent or FI). Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X (n = 33) salah satu SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis Provinsi Jawa Barat. Selanjutnya subjek dikelompokkan berdasarkan kategori Kemampuan Awal Matematis (KAM) (tinggi, sedang, dan rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan tes untuk menentukan level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dan Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) untuk mengklasifikasikan gaya kognitif siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dengan KAM tinggi untuk gaya belajar FD dan FI adalah reflective use; (2) level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dengan KAM sedang dengan gaya kognitif FD adalah strategic use, sedangkan FI adalah reflective use; dan (3) level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dengan KAM rendah dengan gaya kognitif FD adalah aware use, sedangkan FI adalah strategic use.

The level of students' metacognitive ability in learning mathematics based on cognitive styles

Abstract

The research objective was to describe the level of students’ metacognitive ability based on cognitive style (Field Dependent or FD and Field Independent or FI). The research subjects were tenth-grade students (n = 33) at a public senior high school in Ciamis Regency, West Java Province. Furthermore, the subjects were grouped based on the Initial Mathematical Ability (IMA) category (high, medium, and low). This research was a descriptive study using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data collection used a test to determine the level of students’ metacognitive ability and the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) to classify students’ cognitive styles. The results showed that: (1) the level of students’ metacognitive ability with high category of IMA for the cognitive style of FD and FI was reflective use; (2) the level of students’ metacognitive ability with medium category of IMA for the cognitive style of FD was strategic use, while FI was reflective use; and (3) the level of students’ metacognitive ability with low category of IMA for the cognitive style of FD was aware use, while FI was strategic use.

Keywords

Gaya kognitif; level kemampuan metakognitif; pembelajaran matematika; cognitive style; level of metacognitive ability; mathematics learning

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Al-Khayat, M. M. (2012). The level of creative thinking and metacognitive thinking skill of intermediate school in Jordan: Survey study. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 52–61. https://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120804.1173

Alsina, Á., & Mulà, I. (2019). Advancing towards a transformational professional competence model through reflective learning and sustainability: The case of mathematics teacher education. Sustainability, 11, 4039, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154039

Amstrong, S. J., Cools, E., & Smith, E. S. (2011). Role of cognitive styles in business and management: Reviewing 40 years of research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x

Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2010). Methods for effective teaching: Meeting the needs of all students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Fadiana, M. (2016). Perbedaan kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita antara siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1775

Fitriani, F., Noer, S. H., & Gunowibowo, P. (2018). Efektivitas discovery learning ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir reflektif matematis dan self-concept. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unila, 6(3), 263–274. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/MTK/article/view/15520

Hooda, M., & Devi, R. (2017). Significance of cognitive style for academic achievement in mathematics. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 4(22), 5521–5527. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/1201-1509010925.pdf

Hosseinilai, F., & Kasaei, M. A. (2013). The effect of using cognitive and meta cognitive strategy on creativity level academic achievement of high school students. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 7(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i1.1780

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kramarski, B., Weiss, I., & Sharon, S. (2013). Generic versus context-specific prompts for supporting self-regulation in mathematical problem solving among students with low or high prior knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.2.197

Kvedere, L. (2014). Mathematics self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety among 9th grade students in Latvia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2687–2690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.636

Lahinda, Y., & Jailani, J. (2015). Analisis proses pemecahan masalah matematika siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7157

Laurens, T. (2010). Penjenjangan metakognisi siswa yang valid dan reliabilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 17(2), 201–213. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/pendidikan-dan-pembelajaran/article/view/3212/532

Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009

Lindberg, S., Linkersdörfer, J., Ehm, J. -H., Hasselhorn, M., & Lonnemann, J. (2013). Gender differences in children’s math self-concept in the first years of elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p1

Miatun, A., & Nurafni, N. (2019). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflective dan impulsive. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26094

Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prabawa, E. A., & Zaenuri, Z. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa pada model project based learning bernuansa etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 120–129. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/18426

Rahayu, P., & Azizah, U. (2012). Students’ metacognition level through of implementation of problem based learning with metacognitive strategies at SMAN 1 Manyar. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 164–173. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/journal-of-chemical-education/article/view/171/106

Ratumanan, T. G. (2003). Pengaruh model pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa SLTP di kota Ambon. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 1–10. http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_dikdas/article/view/5013

Safitri, K. R., & Saleh, M. (2015). Analisis pemecahan masalah matematika menggunakan metakognisi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UMS, pp. 470-485.

Sophianingtyas, F., & Sugiarto, B. (2013). Identifikasi level metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah perhitungan kimia. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 2(1), 21–27. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/journal-of-chemical-education/article/view/1111/811

Swartz, R., & Chang, A. (1998). Instructional strategies for thinking classroom. National Institute of Education.

Ulya, H., Kartono, K., & Retroningsih, A. (2014). Analysis of mathematics problem solving ability of junior high school students viewed from students’ cognitive style. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2014 (ICMSE 2014). http://icmseunnes.com/2015/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/1.pdf

Usodo, B. (2011). Profil intuisi mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependent dan field independent. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNS, pp. 95-102.

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169967

Yoong, W. K. (2002). Helping your students to become metacognitive in mathematics: a decade later. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.589.1856&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Yunos, J. M., Ahmad, W. M. R. W., & Madar, A. R. (2007). Field dependence-independence stu-dents and animation graphic courseware based instruction. Malaysian Education Deans’ Council Journal, 1, 17–28. http://www.fp.utm.my/versi1/medc/journals/Vol%201/3-%20FIIELD%20DEPENDANCE-INDEPENDENCE%20STUDENT.pdf

Zakiah, N. E. (2014). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan open-ended untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognitif dan mathematical habits of mind siswa SMP (Penelitian kuasi eksperimen pada kelas VIII salah satu SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Majalengka) [Master’s thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/15446/

Zakiah, N. E. (2016). Meningkatkan kemampuan metakognitif siswa melalui pembelajaran dengan pendekatan open-ended. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 1(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v1i1.125

Zakiah, N. E. (2017a). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan kontekstual berbasis gaya kognitif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognitif siswa. Pedagogy, 2(2), 11–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v2i2.700

Zakiah, N. E. (2017b). Metakognisi dalam pembelajaran matematika: Apa, mengapa dan bagaimana pengembangannya?. Inspiramatika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 24–35. http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/Inspiramatika/article/view/192

Zakiah, N. E., Sunaryo, Y., & Amam, A. (2019). Implementasi pendekatan kontekstual pada model pembelajaran berbasis masalah berdasarkan langkah-langkah polya. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 4(2), 111–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v4i2.2706

Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020a). Self regulated learning for social cognitive perspective in mathematics lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012049

Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020b). Hybrid-PjBL: Creative thinking skills and self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032072

Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020c). Management of authentic assessment in mathematics lessons to develop 4C skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012050

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458