Kemampuan proses matematis siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA

Anwaril Hamidy; Jailani Jailani

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679

Kemampuan proses matematis siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA

Anwaril Hamidy, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia
Jailani Jailani, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan proses matematis siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA (Programme for International Students Assessment). Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap 300 siswa kelas IX SMP Kalimantan Timur yang belum pernah mewakili Indonesia sebagai sampel PISA bidang Matematika. Siswa tersebut tersebar dari tiga level sekolah (rendah, sedang, tinggi) yang ditentukan berdasarkan hasil Ujian Nasional 2016 pada mata pelajaran matematika. Pengumpulan data menggunakan 16 butir soal matematika model PISA (α = 0,835) yang mencakup tiga proses matematis: formulate, employ dan interpret. Kemampuan siswa dianalisis berdasarkan mean measure logit dan selanjutnya ditransformasi ke skala dan level kemampuan matematika PISA, sehingga dapat dibandingkan dengan rata-rata kemampuan siswa Indonesia dan negara OECD dalam studi PISA. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan siswa Kalimantan Timur berada di bawah rata-rata negara OECD. Namun hasil tersebut lebih baik dibandingkan capaian skor siswa Indonesia yang menjadi sampel pada PISA 2015. Berdasarkan kemampuan dalam proses matematis, kemampuan siswa dari level tinggi ke rendah berturut-turut adalah formulate, employ dan interpret. Selain itu, kemampuan proses formulate siswa Kalimantan Timur dari sekolah kategori tinggi di atas rata-rata negara OECD.

East kalimantan students’ mathematical process proficiency in solving PISA-like mathematics

Abstract

This study was aimed to describes East Kalimantan students’ mathematical processes proficiency in solving a PISA-like mathematics test. The study was carried out with 300 East Kalimantan ninth-grade students who haven’t represented Indonesia as Mathematics PISA samples. The students were spread across three school levels (low, medium, high) determined based on the results of the 2016 National Examination in mathematics. Data collection uses 16 items of PISA-like mathematics test (α = 0.835) which includes three mathematical processes: formulate, employ, and interpret. Student proficiency was analyzed based on mean measure logit and subsequently transformed to the scale and level of PISA mathematics proficiency so that it can be compared with the average proficiency of Indonesian students and OECD countries in the PISA study. The results of the data analysis show that the average proficiency of East Kalimantan students is below the average of OECD countries. However, these results are better than the average score of Indonesian students who were sampled at PISA 2015. Based on proficiency in the mathematical process, the proficiency of students from high to low levels consecutively namely: formulate, employ, and interpret. In addition, proficiency in the formulating of East Kalimantan students from high-level schools is above the average of OECD countries.

Keywords

kemampuan proses matematis; soal matematika model PISA; Students’ mathematical process; PISA-like mathematics

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Afifah, I. R. N., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Is it difficult to teach higher order thinking skills? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320, 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012098

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan. (2011). Survei internasional PISA. Http://Litbang.Kemdikbud.Go.Id/; Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-pisa/tentang-pisa

Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 15–30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_3

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

de Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 13–35. http://www.human.tsukuba.ac.jp/~mathedu/2503.pdf

Demir, S. B. (2018). The effect of teaching quality and teaching practices on PISA 2012 mathematics achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.463409

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement. Prentice Hall.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R. D., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Hamidy, A., & Jailani, J. (2018). Factors influencing students’ performance in solving international mathematics tests. Character Education for 21st Century Global Citizens: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Teacher Education and Professional Development (INCOTEPD 2017), October 21-22, 2017, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 353–362.

Indartono, S., & Hamidy, A. (2019). The contribution of test type and curriculum difference on the effect of the national test score at international mathematic test score: The challenge of IR 4.0 curriculum. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(82), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.10

Kaleli-Yılmaz, G., & Hanci, A. (2016). Examination of the 8th grade students’ TIMSS mathematics success in terms of different variables 1. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1102977

National Council of Teacher Mathematics. (2000). Prinsiples and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.

Neumann, I., Duchhardt, C., Grüßing, M., Heinze, A., Knopp, E., & Ehmke, T. (2013). Modeling and assessing mathematical competence over the lifespan. Journal for Educational Research Online/Journal Für Bildungsforschung Online, 5(2), 80–109. http://j-e-r-o.com/index.php/jero/article/view/362

Novferma, N. (2016). Analisis kesulitan dan self-efficacy siswa SMP dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berbentuk soal cerita. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.10403

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework : Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014a). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V). OECD, Paris, France.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014b). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results, excellence and equity in education. In Pisa: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2016/2017. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2017!smp!capaian_wilayah!16&99&999!T&C&1&T&1&!2!&

Pusztai, G., & Bacskai, K. (2015). Parochial schools and PISA effectiveness in three Central European Countries. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Social Analysis, 5(2), 145. http://www.acta.sapientia.ro/acta-social/C5-2/social52-03.pdf

Sáenz, C. (2009). The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9167-8

Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126

Tienken, C. (2014). PISA problems. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 10(4), 4–18.

Umbara, U., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Re-interpretation of mathematical literacy based on the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12450a

Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Word problem classification: A promising modelling task at the elementary level. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 47–55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_6

Wardhani, S., & Rumiati, R. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. http://p4tkmatematika.org/file/Bermutu 2011/SMP/4.INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA .....pdf

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3). http://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol11/iss3/8

Wulandari, N. F. (2015). Kemampuan matematika siswa SMP dan SMA di daerah istimewa Yogyakarta dalam menyelesaikan soal model TIMSS dan PISA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Wulandari, N. F., & Jailani, J. (2015). Indonesian students’ mathematics problem solving skill in PISA and TIMSS. Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation And Education Of Mathematics and Sciences 2015 (ICRIEMS 2015).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679