The analysis of students’ mathematical representation errors in solving word problem related to graph

Rahmah Johar; Khairiyah Rahma Lubis

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.17277

The analysis of students’ mathematical representation errors in solving word problem related to graph

Rahmah Johar, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Khairiyah Rahma Lubis, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.17277

Abstract

The skills of reading, interpreting and constructing graphs are important for students. These skills are related to mathematical representation. The purpose of this study is to analyze Grade 8 students’ representation errors in solving word problems related to graphs in one of junior high schools in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The data were obtained based on a mathematics test administered to 36 students and a short interview conducted for five selected students. The test consisted of eight problems adapted from four contexts of PISA problems related to graph. Students’ representation errors were classified based on the errors of changing one representation to another representation, such as visual to verbal, visual to symbolic, visual to visual and verbal to visual. The results reveal that representation errors are not solely influenced by the types of representation. It is indicated by the questions with similar representation resulted in a different percentage of students committing representation errors. In general, the students’ representation errors are due to the fact that students not being familiar with the problems requiring representation; students not being used to solve PISA context problems and word problems; as well as the teachers’ time constraint in teaching non-routine problems.

Keywords

representation error; word problem; graph

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/20205297

Ahmad, A., & Nawawi, M. (2010). Visual representations in mathematical word problem solving among form four students in Malacca. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.12.050

Alhadad, S. F. (2010). Meningkatkan kemampuan representasi multipel matematis, pemecahan masalah matematis, dan self esteem siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran dengan pendekatan open ended. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Bunawan, W., Setiawan, A., Rusli, A., & Nahadi, N. (2015). Penilaian pemahaman representasi grafik materi optika geometri menggunakan tes diagnostik. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4830

Cai, J., Lane, S., & Jakabcsin, M. S. (1996). The role of open-ended tasks and holistic scoring rubrics: Assessing students’ mathematical reasoning and communication. In Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond (pp. 137–145). Reston, VA: Academic Press New York.

Cresswell, J. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (Edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Kajian kebijakan kurikulum mata pelajaran matematika. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.

Dewi, S. K., Suarjana, I. M., & Sumantri, M. (2014). Penerapan model polya untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dalam memecahkan soal cerita matematika siswa kelas V. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 2(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/2057

Enu, J., Agyman, O. K., & Nkum, D. (2015). Factors influencing students’ mathematics performance in some selected colleges of education in Ghana. International Journal of Education Learning and Development, 3(3), 68–74. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Factors-Influencing-Students----Mathematics-Performance-In-Some-Selected-Colleges-Of-Education-In-Ghana.pdf

Gegbe, B., & .J.M, K. (2015). Factors contributing to students poor performance in mathematics at West African senior school certification examination (A case study: Kenema City, Eastern Province Sierra Leone). International Journal Of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(2), 1040–1055. Retrieved from http://ijergs.org

Goldin, G. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In Handbook of International Research In Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 197–218).

Graciella, M., & Suwangsih, E. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan matematika realistik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis siswa. Metodik Didaktik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 10(2). Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/MetodikDidaktik/article/view/3180

Huda, N., & Angel, G. K. (2013). The analysis of students’ difficulties based on the ability on understanding and solving word problem of cube and cuboid content in the 8th grade SMPN 30 Muaro Jambi. In Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Iryanti, P. (2010). Potret pengajaran matematika SMP kelas 8 di Indonesia. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika, 1(2), 108–115.

Kali, H. D. (2005). First-year University Biology student’s difficulties with graphing skill. University of the Witwatersrand Johanesburg.

Kar, T., Işık, A., Öçal, M. F., Çiltaş, A., Güler, G., & Işık, C. (2011). Prospective mathematics teachers abilities’ to construct relations between the different representations of series with complex terms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 356–360.

Kilic, D., Sezen, N., & Sari, M. (2012). A study of pre-service science teacher’s graphing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2937–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.05.593

Knuth, R. A., & Jones, B. F. (1991). What does research say about mathematics?

Legi, Y. M. (2009). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa kelas IV SD melalui pendidikan matematika realistik pada konsep pecahan dan konsep pecahan senilai. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001

Linto, R. L., Elniati, S., & Rizal, Y. (2012). Kemampuan koneksi matematis dan metode pembelajaran quantum teaching dengan peta pikiran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 83–87. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/pmat/article/view/1176

Mbugua, Z. K., Kibet, K., Muthaa, G. M., & Nkonke, G. R. (2012). Factors contributing to students’ poor performance in mathematics at Kenya certificate of secondary education in Kenya: A case of Baringo County, Kenya. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(6), 87–91. Retrieved from https://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_6_June_2012/11.pdf

Mustain, I. (2015). Kemampuan membaca dan interpretasi grafik dan data: Studi kasus pada siswa kelas 8 SMPN. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v4i2.493

National Council of Teacher Mathematics. (2000). Prinsiples and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assesment framework-Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/pisa2003assessmentframeworkmathematicsreadingscienceandproblemsolvingknowledgeandskills-publications2003.htm

OECD. (2009). Take the test. Sample questions from OECD’s PISA assessments. Paris: OECD.

Palm, T. (2009). Theory of authentic task situations. Sense Publishers. Retrieved from http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?language=sv&pid=diva2%3A291640&dswid=7032

Rosyidi, A. H. (2011). The analysis of the students’ error at second grade students’ of MTs Alkhoiriyah in solving word problem about linear equation with two variables. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649

Sepeng, P., & Sigola, S. (2013). Making sense of errors made by learners in mathematical word problem solving. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 325–333. Retrieved from http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/1520

Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169

Sugiman, S. (2008). Koneksi matematik dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah menengah pertama. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/PG.V4I1.687

Suryowati, E. (2015). Kesalahan siswa sekolah dasar dalam merepresentasikan pecahan pada garis bilangan. AKSIOMA Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v4i1.67

Wardhani, S., & Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://p4tkmatematika.org/file/Bermutu 2011/SMP/4.INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA .....pdf

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol11/iss3/8

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.17277