Kontribusi kompetensi guru matematika SMP terhadap prestasi belajar siswa

Tika Abri Astuti; Jailani Jailani

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.16453

Kontribusi kompetensi guru matematika SMP terhadap prestasi belajar siswa

Tika Abri Astuti, Seksi Data dan Informasi, PPPPTK Matematika, Indonesia
Jailani Jailani, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.16453

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kontribusi kompetensi guru matematika SMP terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Kompetensi guru dikelompokkan ke dalam empat ranah, yaitu kompetensi pedagogik, profesional, sosial, dan kepribadian. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei. Data penelitian dikumpulkan melalui angket, data sekunder hasil Ujian Kompetensi Guru (UKG) tahun 2015, dan nilai UAS siswa kelas VII tahun ajaran 2016/2017. Populasi penelitian adalah guru matematika SMP di Kabupaten Sleman dengan sampel penelitian sebanyak 72 guru. Sampel ditentukan dengan proportional random sampling. Untuk mengetahui hubungan antara variabel kompetensi guru dan prestasi belajar siswa digunakan analisis Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa: (1) kompetensi guru dapat menjelaskan prestasi belajar siswa sebesar 44,7%; (2) terdapat kontribusi positif dan signifikan antara kompetensi pedagogik dan kompetensi profesional terhadap prestasi belajar siswa dengan nilai prediksi secara berturut-turut yaitu 0,247 (t = 1,97, p < 0,05) dan 0,248 (t = 2,343, p < 0,05); dan (3) kompetensi sosial dan kepribadian tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap prestasi belajar siswa dengan nilai prediksi secara berturut-turut yaitu 0,227 (t = 1,316, p > 0,05) dan 0,070 (t = 0,410, p > 0,05)

Contribution of junior high school mathematics teacher competence on student’s achievement

Abstract

This research aimed to describe the contribution of junior high school mathematics teacher competence to student achievement. Teacher competence was grouped into four domains, namely pedagogic, professional, social, and personality. This research was survey research. The research data was collected through a questionnaire, secondary data on the 2015 teacher competency examination results, and the seventh-grade students’ final school examination scores for the 2016/2017 academic year. The population was junior high school mathematics teachers in Sleman Regency, Indonesia, with a sample of 72 teachers. The sample was determined by proportional random sampling. To determine the relationship between teacher competence and students’ learning achievement, we used Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis. The results of the study revealed that: (1) teacher competence could explain students' achievement by 44.7%; (2) there was a positive and significant contribution between pedagogic competence and professional competence on students’ achievement with a predictive value of 0.247 (t = 1.97, p < 0.05) and 0.248 (t = 2.343, p < 0.05), respectively; and (3) social and personality competence did not had a significant effect on student achievement with predictive values of 0.227 (t = 1.316, p > 0.05) and 0.070 (t = 0.410, p > 0.05), respectively.

Keywords

kompetensi guru; guru matematika; prestasi belajar siswa; pembelajaran matematika; teacher competence; mathematics teacher; student’s achievement; mathematics learning

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

BPSDMPK & PMP. (2015). Rekap data NUPTK (Tidak diterbitkan). Badan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan, Kemendikbud.

Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill.

Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.05.001

Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. Y., Griffin, M. J., & Choi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 419–459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419

Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Falmer Press.

Djamarah, S. B. (2000). Guru dan anak didik dalam interaksi edukatif. Rineka Cipta.

European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/teacher/teachercomp_en.pdf

Garcia, P., Kupczynski, L., & Holland, G. (2011). The impact of teacher personality styles on academic excellence of secondary students. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 21(3), 1–8.

Guerriero, S. (2016). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/Background_document_to_Symposium_ITEL-FINAL.pdf

Hager, P., & Gonczi, A. (1996). What is competence? Medical teacher, 18(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609040255

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hamalik, O. (2003). Metode belajar dan kesulitan-kesulitan belajar. Remaja Karya.

Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/

Jadama, L. M. (2014). Impact of subject matter knowledge of a teacher in teaching and learning process. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 7, 21–29.

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R, T., (2002). Meaningful assessment: A manageable and cooperative process. Allyn Bacon.

Kemendikbud. (2015). Rencana strategis kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan tahun 2015-2019. http://sdm.data.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/files/2.%20Pemanfaatan%20Data%20Pendidikan.pdf

Kemendiknas. (2007). peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional nomor 16 tahun 2007 tentang standar kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru.

Kemendiknas. (2010). Buku 2: Pedoman pelaksanaan penilaian kinerja guru (PKG). Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kheruniah, A. E. (2013). A teacher personality competence contribution to a student study motivation and discipline to fiqh lesson. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research,2(2), 108–112.

Kunter, M., & Baumert, J., (2013). The COACTIV model of teacher professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand. (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2

Kurniawan, B. D. (2011). Implementasi kebijakan sertifikasi guru dalam rangka meningkatkan profesionalitas guru di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 2(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2011.0015

Ljubetic, M. (2012). New competences for the pre-school teacher: A successful response to the challenges of the 21st century. World Journal of Education, 2(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p82

Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2013). Teacher evaluation that makes a difference: A new model for teacher growth and student achievement. ASCD.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Pearson Education.

Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H. (2010). Becoming a teacher. Pearson Education.

Payong, M. R. (2011). Sertifikasi profesi guru (konsep dasar, problematika dan implementasinya). Indeks.

PPPPTK Matematika (2015). Data hasil uji kompetensi guru matematika tahun 2015 (Tidak diterbitkan). Author.

Purwanto, N. (2006). Psikologi pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Puspendik. (2016). Aplikasi PAMER UN 2015/2016. Balitbang, Kemendikbud.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson Education.

Richardson, R. C., & Arker, E. (2010). Personalities in the classroom: Making the most of them. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 46(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2010.10516698

Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school. Continuum.

Siswandari, S., & Susilaningsih, S. (2013). Dampak sertifikasi guru terhadap peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 19(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v19i4.305

Slovin, M. J. (1960). Sampling. Simon and Schuster.

Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning. (6rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Sugiyono, S. (2015). Cara mudah menyusun skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi. Alfabeta.

Supriadi, D. (1998). Mengangkat citra dan martabat guru. Adicita Karya Nusa.

Wijaya, A., & Sumarno, S. (2017). Evaluasi dampak pendidikan dan pelatihan pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan guru Matematika di PPPPTK Matematika Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.10113

Yamin, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2011). Generasi baru mengolah data penelitian dengan partial least square path modeling. Salemba Infotek.

Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2008). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.16453