The effectiveness of virtual reality media on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis

Risky Setiawan; Rhoma Dwi Aria Yuliantri; Aman Aman; Ebtana Sella Mayang Fitri; Indri Kurniawati; Syahri Ramadan

doi:10.21831/jppfa.v12i1.67764

The effectiveness of virtual reality media on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis

Risky Setiawan, (Scopus ID: 57195803837) Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Rhoma Dwi Aria Yuliantri, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Aman Aman, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ebtana Sella Mayang Fitri, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Indri Kurniawati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Syahri Ramadan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jppfa.v12i1.67764

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of virtual reality media on student learning outcomes seen from the value of the effect size of published studies. This study used the meta-analysis method, with a group contrast design from experimental research and quasi-experiments that had experimental groups and control groups. The database used is the SCOPUS database. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method determines articles. Data collection is carried out by collecting article metadata with specific keywords that have been determined. The article metadata obtained is then sorted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The next step is to download a PDF of the article that matches the criteria. The downloaded PDF is tabulated to obtain statistical data in effect size calculations. Calculation of the effect size of each study and data analysis to prove research hypotheses using the R application version 4.2.0 and assisted by the RStudio. The results showed a Q value of 163.54 with a p-value of 0.0001 < α (0.05), so it can be concluded that there is heterogeneity from the observed data regarding the effectiveness of virtual reality media research on learning outcomes. An I2 value of 90.8% indicates substantial heterogeneity categories. For this reason, a random effect size model is used; The results showed a random effect size of 0.6285 with a p-value of 0.0001 < α (0.05). A value of 0.6285 indicates the influence is in the medium category; The results showed that there were differences in the effectiveness of the given continental differences (Q value = 8.24 and p-value 0.02 > α (0.05)). There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of virtual reality media on learning outcomes in terms of education level (Q = 7.39 and p-value 0.02 < α (0.05)); The results showed that the distribution of data showed symmetric, indicating that none of the studies were distorted or article bias occurred.

Keywords

Meta-analysis, effectiveness, learning success, virtual reality

References

Akgün, M., & Atici, B. (2022a). The Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Environments on Students’Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytical and Meta-thematic Study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 111– 131. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.57.9.3

Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 166, 104154.

Alfatih, A. A. (2021). Problematika dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam pada masa pandemi covid-19 di SMP Islam Almaarif 01 Singosari [Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/28644/

Arifin, M. (2000). Filsafat pendidikan Islam. Bumi Aksara. Marfuah, M., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Isnawan, M. G. (2022). Providing Online Learning Situations for In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ External Transposition Knowledge During COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Indonesia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1 Special Issue), 69–84. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2388

Anam, S., & Hanik, E. U. (2020). Problematika Kebijakkan Pendidikan di Tengah Pandemi dan Dampaknya Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Qiro’ah: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(2), 73– 81. https://doi.org/10.33511/qiroah.v10n2.73-81

Andiyanto, T. (2018). Konsep Pendidikan Pranatal, Postnatal, Dan Pendidikan Sepanjang Hayat. Elementary: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan dasar, 4(2), 195– 204.

Arslan, F., & Kaysi, F. (2013). Virtual learning environment. Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(4), 57-65

Aviory, K., Wahyumiani, N., & Suharni, S. (2022). Factors that affect learning outcomes in online learning. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v8i1.44454

Aziz, E.-S., Esche, S., & Chassapis, C. (2009). Review Of The State Of The Art In Virtual Learning Environments Based On Multiplayer Computer Games. 14.1032.1-14.1032.16. https://peer.asee.org/review-of-the-state-of-the-art-in-virtual-learning-environments-based-on-multiplayer-computer-games

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Basri, B. (2017). Bimbingan Konseling Dan Kesuksesan Belajar. Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, Query date: 2022-07-11 01:43:08. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/tarbawiyah/article/view/358

Bashori, M., Van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2021). Effects of ASR-based websites on EFL learners’ vocabulary, speaking anxiety, and language enjoyment. System, 99, 102496.

Chan, A.-W., Song, F., Vickers, A., Jefferson, T., Dickersin, K., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krumholz, H. M., Ghersi, D., & van der Worp, H. B. (2014). Increasing value and reducing waste: Addressing inaccessible research. The Lancet, 383(9913), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5

Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/applying-realistic-mathematics-education-rme-in-teaching-geometry

Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Edition. Dalam New Media Consortium. New Media Consortium. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED588803

Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015, April 1). A Literature Review on Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: State Of The Art and Perspectives.

Gavaghan, D. J., Moore, A. R., & McQuay, H. J. (2000). An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain, 85(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00302-4

Gillespie, H., Boulton, H., Hramiak, A., & Williamson, R. (2007). Learning and Teaching with Virtual Learning Environments. Learning Matters.

Herlambang, P. M., & Aryoseto, L. (2016). Potensi Virtual Reality Berbasis Smartphone sebagai Media Belajar Mahasiswa Kedokteran. Cermin Dunia Kedokteran, 43(6), 412–415. https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v43i6.67

Hidayah, A. A. F., Al Adawiyah, R., & Mahanani, P. A. R. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi covid-19. JURNAL SOSIAL Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 21(2), 53–56.

Higgins, J. P. T. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

Hovlid, E., Husabø, G., Valestrand, E. A., & Hartveit, M. (2022). Learning team- based quality improvement in a virtual setting: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 12(6), e061390. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061390

Huang, M., Kuang, F., & Ling, Y. (2022). EFL learners’ engagement in different activities of blended learning environment. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00136-7

Hutama, R. C., & Trisnawati, R. (2017). Pengaruh Keterlibatan Pemakai Sistem, Program Pelatihan dan Pendidikan, Kemampuan Teknik Personal, Dukungan Manajemen Puncak, dan Formalisasi Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Sistem Informasi Akuntansi di Bank Umum Kota Surakarta [S1, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/49463/

Indraswari, A. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Matematika Realistik melalui Lingkungan Belajar Virtual terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Di SMP Perguruan Sumatra T.A 2017/2018 [Undergraduate, UNIMED]. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/29026/

Jaffe, K. (2015). Social and Natural Sciences Differ in Their Research Strategies, Adapted to Work for Different Knowledge Landscapes. arXiv:1403.5107 [physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5107

Jones, C., Jones, D., & Moro, C. (2021). Use of virtual and augmented reality-based interventions in health education to improve dementia knowledge and attitudes: An integrative review. BMJ Open, 11(11). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053616

Khasanah, B. A., & Khoiriah, S. (2017). Efektivitas Penerapan Strategi Learning Start With A Question pada Pembelajaran Matematika.

Kristanto, Y. D., & Padmi, R. S. (2020). Using network analysis for rapid, transparent, and rigorous thematic analysis: A case study of online distance learning. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.33912

Luthfi, N. F., & Hamdi, S. (2020). Evaluation of online learning in Natural Science for junior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.35015

Maruhawa, F. (2019). Faktor kesiapan dan keberhasilan implementasi sistem informasi di Institusi Pendidikan Dasar. repository.uinjkt.ac.id, Query date: 2022-07-11 09:16:09. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/51999

Miles, D. (2017). Research Methods and Strategies Workshop: A Taxonomy of Research Gaps: Identifying and Defining the Seven Research Gaps.

Msila, V. (2020). Heutagogy and teaching: Toward liberatory methods. International Journal of Humanities Education, 18(1), 1–18. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/V18I01/1-18

Oonk, C., Gulikers, J., den Brok, P., & Mulder, M. (2022). Stimulating boundary crossing learning in a multi-stakeholder learning environment for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 21–40. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0156

Phungsuk, R., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2017). Development of a problem-based learning model via a virtual learning environment. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 297–306.

Putri, U. H. (2019). Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Pembiayaan Pendidikan. INA-Rxiv. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/yg3an

Rohmawati, A. (2015). Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 9(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.091.02

Rudyanto, H., Ghufron, A., & Hartono, H. (2019). Use of Integrated Mobile Application With Realistic Mathematics Education: A Study to Develop Elementary Students’ Creative Thinking Ability.

Saat, S. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Determinan Dalam Pendidikan (Studi Tentang Makna dan Kedudukannya dalam Pendidikan). Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 8(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31332/atdb.v8i2.407

Scott, E., Soria, A., & Campo, M. (2017). Adaptive 3D Virtual Learning Environments—A Review of the Literature. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2609910

Setiawan, H., Isnaeni, W., Budijantoro, F. P. M. H., & Marianti, A. (2015). Implementation of digital learning using interactive multimedia in excretory system with virtual laboratory. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 1(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6501

Suhariyono, S., & Retnawati, H. (2022). The Influence of Online Learning on Physics Learning Outcomes During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v15i1.1812

Supriyono. (2000). Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen. BPFE.

Syafii, A., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Opportunities and Challenges of Online Learning Methods in Religious Education. 285–290. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220129.052

Tenório, M. M., Reinaldo, F. A. F., Góis, L. A., Lopes, R. P., & dos Santos Junior, G. (2018). Elements of gamification in virtual learning environments: A systematic review. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 716, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_12

Trinidad, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2005). Development, validation and use of the Online Learning Environment Survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1343

Villena Taranilla, R., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., González-Calero, J. A., & López Cirugeda, I. (2022). Strolling through a city of the Roman Empire: An analysis of the potential of virtual reality to teach history in Primary Education. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674886

Wijayanti, D. (2018). Character Education Designed By Ki Hadjar Dewantara. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 10(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v10i2.10865

Wilson, B. G. (2001). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Educational Technology Pubns.

Yunita, Y., & Elihami, E. (2021). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Dengan Media E- Learning: Diskursus Melalui Problem Soving Di Era Pandemik Covid-19. JURNAL EDUKASI NONFORMAL, 2(1), 133–146.

Zulkardi, Z. (2002). Developing A Learning Environment On Realistic Mathematics Education For Indonesian Student Teachers [Doctoral, University of Twente, Enschede]. http://doc.utwente.nl/58718/1/thesis_Zulkardi.pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v12i1.67764