Application of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Assessment Equipped with Certainty of Response Index as a Misconception Diagnosis Instrument in Chemistry Learning

Nilamsari Cahyani; Army Auliah; Ahmad Fudhail  Majid

doi:10.21831/jpms.v12i1.74390

Application of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Assessment Equipped with Certainty of Response Index as a Misconception Diagnosis Instrument in Chemistry Learning

Nilamsari Cahyani, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Army Auliah, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Ahmad Fudhail Majid, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

10.21831/jpms.v12i1.74390

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to analyze misconceptions and diagnose the causes of misconceptions in learning chemistry on acid-base material experienced by high school students in the second year. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a squental explanatory design. The research subjects consisted of all students of class XI IPA 2 SMA Hasanuddin Gowa. The research instruments used include diagnostic tests and interview guidelines. Data were collected through two-tier multiple choice diagnostic tests supported by CRI (Certainty of Response Index) and interviews. The results of the analysis showed the presence of misconceptions in all indicators of the acid-base concept, with an average percentage of misconceptions exceeding 20%. The highest level of misconception was found in the concept of pH in the environment (63.0%), while the lowest misconception was found in the concept of acid-base indicators (33.3%). Diagnosis of the causes of students' misconceptions includes students' lack of mastery of chemical representations, the existence of intuitive and associative thinking, and students' lack of interest in learning chemistry.

Keywords: Misconception, two-tier multiple choice, CRI, acid-base.

Keywords

Misconception, two-tier multiple choice, CRI, acid-base

Full Text:

PDF

References

Damayanti., Kristina, Sri Susilogati, dan Sri Kadarwati. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam Dalam Pembelajaran Dengan Model Guided Inquiry. JIPK. Vol 15, No 1.

Gusman, T. A., Azizah, D., Cahyani, M. D., & Mulyadi, E. (2022). Hakikat dan Peran Ilmu Kimia. CV. Zenius Publisher.

Hakim, A., Liliasari, L., & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI‏. ‏International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 544–553.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299.

Ibrahim, Muslimin. H. (2012). Konsep, Miskonsepsi dan Cara Pembelajarannya. Jakarta: Unesa Universitas Press.

Kara, M. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review: Constructivism in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(December), 19–26.

McClary, L., M. & Bretz, S. L. 2012. Development And Assessment Of A Diagnostic Tool To Identify Organic Chemistry Student’ Alternative Conception Related To Acid Strength. International Journal Of Science Education.

Mentari, L. I Nyoman Suardana, I Wayan Subagia. (2014). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Sma Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Untuk Materi Larutan Penyangga. E-Journal Kimia Visvitalis Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 2(1).

Nahadi. Wiwi Siswaningsih dan Rose Purnamasari. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Dan Manfaatnya Dalam Mengukur Konsepsi Kimia Siswa Sma. Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 1(1), 51-58.

Noprianti, E., & Utami, L. (2017). Penggunaan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostik Test Disertai Cri Untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Peserta didik. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(2), 124–129.

Nurulwati. A. Rahmadani. (2020). Perbandingan Hasil Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three Tier Dan Four Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education). pISSN: 2338-4379 eISSN: 2615-840X.

Rokhim., D.A., Sri Rahayu1, I Wayan Dasna. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya: Literatur Review. JIPK 17 (1). p-ISSN 1979-0503 e-ISSN 2503-1244.

Shui-Te., Liu., Irene W.K., Sri Wardani, dan Harjito. (2018). Hasil Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Ditinjau Dari Aspek Makroskopis, Mikroskopis, Dan Simbolik (Mms) Pada Pokok Bahasan Partikulat Sifat Materi Di Taiwan. JIPK. Vol 12, No. 1.

Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon,7(11).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352

Sugiyono, Heru Pratomo Al. (2013). Miskonsepsi atas Konsep Asam-Basa, Kesetimbangan Kimia, dan Redoks dalam berbagai Buku Ajar Kimia SMA/MA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains (JPMS).

Sugrah, N. U. (2020). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika, 19(2), 121–138.

Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Tayubi, Y. R. (2005). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal UPI, 24(3), 4–9.

Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic Assesment in Science as a means to improving Teaching, Learning and Retention, Uni Serve Science Assesment Sympossium Proceedings.

Tuysuz. C. (2009). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students’ Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(6), 626–631.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Miskonsepsi Peserta didik Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Serta Remediasinya. Jurnal Bio Education, 2, 50–58.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i1.74390