The evaluation of authentic assessment implementation of Curriculum 2013 in Elementary School

Muhammad Nur Wangid, Department of Primary Education, The Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ali Mustadi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Anwar Senen, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nur Luthfi Rizqa Herianingtyas, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/pep.v21i1.15779

Abstract


This research was aimed to evaluate the implementation of authentic assessment of elementary school in Province of Yogyakarta and also to know the obstacles of its implementation. This was an evaluative research by a Stake's evaluation model approach. The results of observation in compare to the standard of assessment should be criteria to determine the succeed. This research subjects were elementary teachers in Province of Yogyakarta. Observation, interview, and documentation were used to gather data. The research showed that: (1) Planning (antecedents) stage or understanding towards authentic assessment planning has not been fulfilled the standard to be categorized as Good with percentage of 68.75%; (2) Process (transaction) or implementation stage that obtained 63.41% in percentage was classified in Good category; (3) Outcome stage or authentic assessment report showed 68.48% in percentage and should be categorized Good. The implementation of authentic assessment in Province of Yogyakarta elementary schools have not 100% met the standard. Therefore, results from this research finding were expected to be tools to improve performance from all stakeholders.

Keywords


authentic assessment evaluation; Curriculum of 2013

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References


Alkin, M. C. (2011). Essential evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Earth Literacy.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Doll, R. C. (1964). Curriculum improvement: decision-making and process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161

Frey, B. B., & Schmitt, V. L. (2007). Coming to terms with classroom assessment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-495

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hein, G. E. (1991). Active assessment for active science. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Jones. (2005). Assessment for learning. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Materi pelatihan guru implementasi kurikulum 2013 Tahun 2014 SD Kelas IV. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Khilmiyah, A., Sumarno, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2015). Pengembangan model penilaian keterampilan intrapribadi dan antarpribadi dalam pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4550

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian (2013).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/documents/vol1_no1_mueller_001.pdf

Palm, T. (2008). Authentic assessment and performance assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 13(4). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=13%26n=4

Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers : with portfolios and authentic assessment. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4316450.aspx?tab=1

Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2008). Authentic assessment of the young child: celebrating development and learning (2nd ed.). Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262

Suarta, I. M., Hardika, N. S., Sanjaya, I. G. N., & Arjana, I. W. B. (2015). Model authentic self-assessment dalam pengembangan employability skills mahasiswa pendidikan tinggi vokasi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4555

Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: kompetensi dan praktiknya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Pengembangan kurikulum teori dan praktik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wiggins, G. (1989a). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.

Wiggins, G. (1989b). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41–47.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.15779

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics